Split (1)

train · 603 rows

c_id int64 18.7k 1.8B	texts stringlengths 4.83k 6.84k
18,671	fundamental summary Looking at Albemarle's financials of Q1 reflected decent results. We do believe, though, that macro-related market conditions will influence Albemarle's performance more significantly than its individual results. Therefore, Albemarle received an overall score of 75, translating into a HOLD ranking. balance sheet Overall, Albemarle's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Albemarle did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 9.2B, representing a 15.00% change. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 5.04% percent by this parameter. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 81. Also, Albemarle's management was effective in improving its cash and cash equivalents metrics, which now sit at 1.6B. This represents 6.00% change from the last reporting period. This impressive growth, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. The company's cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 75. That said, one metric, Assets, stood out as particularly concerning. Albemarle assets metrics were reported as 17.6B, representing a 14.00% change from the last filing. This unimpressive metric is weaker than its peers and competitors. Therefore, their asset component earned a score of 57. Their balance sheet received an overall score of 76. income statement Overall, Albemarle's critical income statement metrics appear to strongly support positive growth going forward. Albemarle reported impressive EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 3.7B, representing 27.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 21.19%. The company is headed in the right direction regarding EBITDA, exhibiting efficient capital controls and strong overall financial performance. Consequently, their EBITDA movement received a grade of 96. Also, Albemarle's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 49.2, representing a change of 22.00%. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 94. On the other hand, Revenue Efficiency, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Albemarle reported discouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. As of the current filing, they were reported as 8.8B and represented 20.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 26.10% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency does not make a compelling case for upward pressure on the company's stock price. Its revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 38. Therefore, we scored its income statement a 68. cash flow Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the cash flow's strength in Albemarle's recent report: Asset Turnover and Free Cash flow. Albemarle's published asset turnover numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. Albemarle recorded asset turnover of 0.6, which represents a 9.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 8.68% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their impressive asset turnover metrics, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support a tailwind in the company's stock price. Therefore, its asset turnover movement earned a score of 97. Also, Albemarle's published free cash flow numbers were substantial and reflected management's focus on a healthy change strategy. Albemarle recorded free cash flow of 8.3, which represents a 51.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 4.15%. The company's free cash flow metrics are especially strong compared to its peers. Management seems to balance cash flow management, asset growth, and resource allocations in general. Consequently, their free cash flow movement received a grade of 88. On the other hand, Capital Expenditure, jumped out as looking problematic. Albemarle's management did not a remarkable job this period managing capital expenditures (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -1.4B, which represents a -15.00% change from the last period. They appears to be headed in the wrong direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Consequently, their CapEx movement received a grade of 51. Its cash flow, therefore, earned a score of 82. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Albemarle's stock is now priced above its 5-day and 50-day, but below its 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in both the short and medium-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Albemarle's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 68.
18,711	fundamental summary Allstate's financial reports for Q1 showed some underwhelming results. Their growth and value factors performance indicate that company management is having trouble hitting the right targets or executing. These results suggest a challenging future for Allstate's stock. We therefore gave Allstate a total score of 55 out of 100 and a UNDERPERFORM recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Allstate's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Allstate produced great equity metrics for this filing, demonstrating management's skill in increasing shareholder value. Allstate's equity was reported as 15.5B, which represents a 0.00% change from the last report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 6.45%. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. Therefore, its equity movement component earned a score of 88. Also, Allstate is doing a good job of keeping its liabilities under control and growing intelligently. At filing, their liabilities were 82.3B, representing 2.00% change from the previous period. These liabilities changes appear balanced compared to their peers and project the message that management is capable and focused on balancing asset growth, resource allocation, and growing liabilities. The company's liabilities movement component, therefore, received a grade of 72. That said, one metric, Book Value Factors, stood out as particularly concerning. Allstate publishes discouraging results related to book value factors in this report. As of the current filing, price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 2.0, representing a -13.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 21.98%. Their book value factor metrics are even more concerning when compared to their peers. Disappointing results in book value factors typically precede negative pressure in stock prices, so its book value factors received a grade of 57. Consequently, the company's balance sheet earned a rank of 64. income statement A few key income statement metrics in this report were discouraging. Return factors metrics and ratios were disappointing in this report. Allstate reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of -11.5, representing a change of -79.00% from the last report.change of -79.00% from the previous period. This metric might have a 14.26% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. These numbers show that management has been unsuccessful in fostering appropriate growth related to return on assets and return on equity momentum relative to their peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 45. Also, Allstate's management didn't make significant improvements to their EBITDA this period. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as -1.7B, which represents a -253.00% change from the last period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 11.80%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more problematic when compared to their peers. Therefore, their EBITDA component earned a score of 47. On the other hand, Revenue Efficiency, jumped out as looking rather positive. Allstate reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 7.00%. Their impressive revenue efficiency is even more impressive relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 65. Because of these weaknesses, its income statement received an overall score of 44. cash flow Overall, Allstate's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Allstate's management did a great job this period managing its capital expenditure (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -160.0M, which represents a 24.00% change from the last period. The company appears to be headed in the right direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Consequently, their CapEx movement received a grade of 93. Also, Allstate's published asset turnover numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. Allstate recorded asset turnover of 0.5, which represents a 3.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 4.53%. Its asset turnover metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. The company's asset turnover movement, therefore, received a grade of 86. That said, one metric, Net Cash Flow, stood out as strongly negative. Allstate's management was not successful in meaningfully improving their cash flow metrics. As of the current filing, they were reported as -468.0M and represented a -1633.00% change from the previous period. Their net cash flow momentum should be a cause for concern and could bring negative momentum for Allstate's stock price going forward. Hence, their net cash flow earned a score of 62. Consequently, the company's cash flow earned a score of 86. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Allstate's stock is now priced above its 5-day, but below its 50-day and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Allstate's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 52.
18,749	fundamental summary Amazon published its Q1 report on Apr 28, 2023 with positive results, but no significant factors particularly remarkable relative to its peers. It is highly likely that it will be mostly tethered to market performance and sector movements for the near term. Therefore, Amazon received an overall score of 77, translating into a HOLD ranking. balance sheet Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the balance sheet strength in Amazon's recent report: Book Value Factors and Equity. Amazon's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 7.6 and represents 27.00% change from the previous report. Their industry-leading book value factors momentum reinforces an expectation for future positive momentum for their stock price going forward. Therefore, its book value factors earned a score of 91. Also, Amazon did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 154.5B, representing a 6.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.17%. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 77. That said, one metric, Liabilities, stood out as particularly concerning. In terms of liabilities, Amazon published uninspiring results. Their reported liabilities were 309.9B, representing a -2.00% change from the previous report. These liabilities metrics show that management has been unsuccessful in encouraging healthy growth while managing liabilities. Its liabilities movement component, therefore, received a grade of 58. Consequently, their balance sheet earned a rank of 70. income statement EBITDA and Return Factors stand out as the most significant drivers of Amazon's income statement's strength. Amazon's management did a remarkable job this period managing its EBITDA. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 68.4B, which represents a 5.00% change from the last period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 18.90%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 85. Also, In this filing, Amazon reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 3.0, which represents a change of 255.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. The company's return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 84. On the other hand, Revenue Efficiency, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Amazon management did an underwhelming job managing revenue efficiency this past period. Amazon's revenue efficiency is 524.9B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 2.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 19.36% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Its uninspiring revenue efficiency is even more concerning relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. As a result, their revenue efficiency earned a score of 65. Therefore, we scored its income statement a 77. cash flow Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the cash flow's strength in Amazon's recent report: Free Cash flow and Capital Expenditure. Free cash flow numbers published by Amazon were -0.8, which was a 49.00% change from the previous filing. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.71%. The company's free cash flow metrics are especially strong compared to its peers. Management seems to balance cash flow management, asset growth, and resource allocations in general. The company's free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 85. Also, Amazon's management was effective in improving its CapEx, which now sits at -57.6B and represents 1.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Consequently, their CapEx movement received a grade of 75. At the same time, one critical cash flow metric, Asset Turnover, was notably weak. Asset turnover metrics during this period were surprisingly weak. Their reported asset turnover metrics of 1.2, which represents a 3.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 1.59%. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly less impressive when compared to their peers and competitors. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 57. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash flow was given a score of 70. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Amazon's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Amazon's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 68.
18,749	fundamental summary Amazon published its Q1 report on Apr 28, 2023 with positive results, but no significant factors particularly remarkable relative to its peers. It is highly likely that it will be mostly tethered to market performance and sector movements for the near term. Therefore, Amazon received an overall score of 77, translating into a HOLD ranking. balance sheet Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the balance sheet strength in Amazon's recent report: Book Value Factors and Equity. Amazon's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 7.6 and represents 27.00% change from the previous report. Their industry-leading book value factors momentum reinforces an expectation for future positive momentum for their stock price going forward. Therefore, its book value factors earned a score of 91. Also, Amazon did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 154.5B, representing a 6.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.17%. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 77. That said, one metric, Liabilities, stood out as particularly concerning. In terms of liabilities, Amazon published uninspiring results. Their reported liabilities were 309.9B, representing a -2.00% change from the previous report. These liabilities metrics show that management has been unsuccessful in encouraging healthy growth while managing liabilities. Its liabilities movement component, therefore, received a grade of 58. Consequently, their balance sheet earned a rank of 70. income statement EBITDA and Return Factors stand out as the most significant drivers of Amazon's income statement's strength. Amazon's management did a remarkable job this period managing its EBITDA. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 68.4B, which represents a 5.00% change from the last period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 18.90%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 85. Also, In this filing, Amazon reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 3.0, which represents a change of 255.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. The company's return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 84. On the other hand, Revenue Efficiency, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Amazon management did an underwhelming job managing revenue efficiency this past period. Amazon's revenue efficiency is 524.9B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 2.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 19.36% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Its uninspiring revenue efficiency is even more concerning relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. As a result, their revenue efficiency earned a score of 65. Therefore, we scored its income statement a 77. cash flow Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the cash flow's strength in Amazon's recent report: Free Cash flow and Capital Expenditure. Free cash flow numbers published by Amazon were -0.8, which was a 49.00% change from the previous filing. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.71%. The company's free cash flow metrics are especially strong compared to its peers. Management seems to balance cash flow management, asset growth, and resource allocations in general. The company's free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 85. Also, Amazon's management was effective in improving its CapEx, which now sits at -57.6B and represents 1.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Consequently, their CapEx movement received a grade of 75. At the same time, one critical cash flow metric, Asset Turnover, was notably weak. Asset turnover metrics during this period were surprisingly weak. Their reported asset turnover metrics of 1.2, which represents a 3.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 1.59%. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly less impressive when compared to their peers and competitors. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 57. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash flow was given a score of 70. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Amazon's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Amazon's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 68.
19,049	fundamental summary At a high level, the metrics from Bank of America's Q1 financial report release were demonstrably positive. Their growth, value, and income factors indicate a well-executed and balanced strategy, which is generating exciting growth. We expect that this positive performance will continue in the coming months, and anticipate that Bank of America will maintain good momentum even in a challenging environment. We gave Bank of America a 80 rating and a BUY recommendation. balance sheet Two main balance sheet metrics are driving the positive outlook for Bank of America's financial strength going forward. Bank of America's management was effective in improving its cash and cash equivalents metrics, which now sit at 369.7B. This represents 66.00% change from the last reporting period. This impressive growth, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. Therefore, its cash and cash equivalents movement earned a score of 91. Also, Bank of America did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 251.8B, representing a 3.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 6.45%. These equity changes appear exceptionally balanced and impressive objectively compared to their peers. Therefore, its equity movement component earned a score of 90. That said, one metric, Assets, stood out as particularly concerning. Bank of America's management did not succeed in significantly improving the value of the assets on their balance sheet, which now sits at 3.2T and represents a 5.00% change from the previous report. Bank of America's unremarkable asset growth results, specifically compared to their industry peers' performance, should present negative pressure on Bank of America's stock price. Consequently, their asset movement received a grade of 49. Consequently, its balance sheet earned a rank of 83. income statement Bank of America appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics, especially Return Factors. Return factors metrics and ratios were exceptional in this report. Bank of America reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 10.5, representing a change of 3.00% from the last report. The company appears headed in the right direction in terms of these return factors, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 72. That said, one metric, Revenue Efficiency, stood out as strongly negative. Bank of America reported discouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. As of the current filing, they were reported as 94.5B and represented 2.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 7.00% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency does not make a compelling case for upward pressure on the company's stock price. Its revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 67. their income statement received an overall score of 71. cash flow Overall, Bank of America's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Free cash flow numbers published by Bank of America were 3.4, which was a 540.00% change from the previous filing. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.09%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. The company's free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 98. Also, Bank of America is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were nan, representing a nan% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 4.53% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly more impressive when contrasted against their peers and competitors. Therefore, its asset turnover movement earned a score of 66. However, one discouraging result, Net Cash Flow, stood out. Bank of America's management was not successful in meaningfully improving their cash flow metrics. As of the current filing, they were reported as 102.3B and represented a 187.00% change from the previous period. Their net cash flow momentum should be a cause for concern and could bring negative momentum for Bank of America's stock price going forward. Hence, their net cash flow earned a score of 41. Therefore, their cash flow earned a grade of 69. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Bank of America's stock is now priced above its 5-day and 50-day, but below its 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in both the short and medium-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Bank of America's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 68.
19,109	fundamental summary Truist's financial results from Q1 demonstrated decent performance, but will likely only help Truist remain on par with its peers. This typically translates into the stock performing on par with market performance for the upcoming quarter. Overall, Truist's value and growth factors are trending positively, and we, therefore, give Truist an overall grade of 73 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Truist's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Truist's management was effective in improving its cash and cash equivalents metrics, which now sit at 37.6B. This represents 76.00% change from the last reporting period. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. It suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect its actual intrinsic value. Consequently, their cash and cash equivalents movement received a grade of 92. Also, Truist's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 0.8 and represents -29.00% change from the previous report. These book value factor numbers show that management has been prudent in focusing on efficient growth. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Consequently, their book value factors movement received a grade of 76. That said, one metric, Equity, stood out as particularly concerning. Truist management produced disappointing equity metrics this period, which stood at 55.7B, representing a 3.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 6.45%. Their equity metrics appear unremarkable relative to their peers. Therefore, their equity movement component earned a score of 47. Their balance sheet, therefore, earned a score of 73. income statement Truist appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics, especially Revenue Efficiency. Truist reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 7.00%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 75. That said, one metric, Return Factors, stood out as strongly negative. Return factors metrics and ratios were disappointing in this report. Truist reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 10.0, representing a change of 3.00% from the last report.change of 3.00% from the previous period. This metric might have a 14.26% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. These numbers show that management has been unsuccessful in fostering appropriate growth related to return on assets and return on equity momentum relative to their peers. Therefore, their return factors component earned a score of 73. their income statement received an overall score of 72. cash flow Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the cash flow's strength in Truist's recent report: Capital Expenditure and Free Cash flow. Truist's management did a great job this period managing its capital expenditure (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -564.0M, which represents a 0.00% change from the last period. The company appears to be headed in the right direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. The company's CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 71. Also, Truist did a great job related to free cash flow this period, which stood at 7.9, representing a 3.00% change from the previous filing. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.09%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. The company's free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 70. That said, one metric, Net Cash Flow, stood out as particularly concerning. Truist's management was not successful in meaningfully improving their cash flow metrics. As of the current filing, they were reported as 7.5B and represented a 564.00% change from the previous period. Their net cash flow momentum should be a cause for concern and could bring negative momentum for Truist's stock price going forward. Its net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 53. Therefore, the company's cash flow earned a grade of 65. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Truist's stock is now priced above its 5-day and 50-day, but below its 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in both the short and medium-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Truist's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 68.
19,609	fundamental summary Charter's financial results from Q1 demonstrated decent performance, but will likely only help Charter remain on par with its peers. We do believe, though, that macro-related market conditions will influence the company's performance more significantly than its individual results. Bottom line, Charter's financials indicate solid performance in terms of value and growth, which leads us to believe that they may become interesting again in the next few months. But for right now, we gave the company an overall grade of 71 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Charter's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Charter did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 9.4B, representing a 3.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 7.63%. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. Therefore, its equity movement component earned a score of 88. Also, Charter publishes solid book value factor metrics in this report. Price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 5.6 and represents a -2.00% change from the previous report. The company's book value factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. The company's book value factors component, therefore, received a grade of 80. That said, one metric, Cash & Equivalents, stood out as particularly concerning. Charter's management did a relatively poor job managing cash and cash equivalents, which now sit at 534.0M and represents a -17.00% change from the last reporting period. Their anemic growth in cash and cash equivalents, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should hurt their stock price. Discouraging results like these statistically lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated their cash and cash equivalents with a score of 52. The company's balance sheet received an overall score of 76. income statement Overall, Charter's critical income statement metrics appear to strongly support positive growth going forward. Return factors metrics and ratios were exceptional in this report. Charter reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 39.1, representing a change of 3.00% from the last report. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 77. Also, Charter reported impressive EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 22.2B, representing 0.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 17.24%. The company is headed in the right direction regarding EBITDA, exhibiting efficient capital controls and strong overall financial performance. Consequently, their EBITDA movement received a grade of 73. At the same time, one critical income statement metric, Revenue Efficiency, was notably weak. Charter management did an underwhelming job managing revenue efficiency this past period. Charter's revenue efficiency is 54.5B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 1.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 11.83% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', isn't encouraging. Its revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 67. Therefore, it received a score of 72. cash flow Charter appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Charter presents exciting net cash flow numbers for its recent financial release, illustrated by a net cash flow of -1.9B, which is a change of -4411.00% from the last filing. This industry-leading net cash flow momentum should reinforce broader positive momentum for its's stock price going forward. Consequently, their net cash flow movement received a grade of 71. Also, Charter is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.4, representing a 0.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 2.38% percent by this parameter. Its asset turnover metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its asset turnover movement earned a score of 68. At the same time, one critical cash flow metric, Capital Expenditure, was notably weak. Charter's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were discouraging and reflected management's unbalanced growth strategy. Charter recorded CapEx of -10.0B, which represents a -6.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more uninspiring relative to their peers and competitors. Its CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 54. Consequently, their cash flow earned a score of 68. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Charter's stock is now priced above its 5-day, but below its 50-day and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Charter's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 47.
19,609	fundamental summary Charter's financial results from Q1 demonstrated decent performance, but will likely only help Charter remain on par with its peers. We do believe, though, that macro-related market conditions will influence the company's performance more significantly than its individual results. Bottom line, Charter's financials indicate solid performance in terms of value and growth, which leads us to believe that they may become interesting again in the next few months. But for right now, we gave the company an overall grade of 71 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Charter's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Charter did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 9.4B, representing a 3.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 7.63%. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. Therefore, its equity movement component earned a score of 88. Also, Charter publishes solid book value factor metrics in this report. Price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 5.6 and represents a -2.00% change from the previous report. The company's book value factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. The company's book value factors component, therefore, received a grade of 80. That said, one metric, Cash & Equivalents, stood out as particularly concerning. Charter's management did a relatively poor job managing cash and cash equivalents, which now sit at 534.0M and represents a -17.00% change from the last reporting period. Their anemic growth in cash and cash equivalents, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should hurt their stock price. Discouraging results like these statistically lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated their cash and cash equivalents with a score of 52. The company's balance sheet received an overall score of 76. income statement Overall, Charter's critical income statement metrics appear to strongly support positive growth going forward. Return factors metrics and ratios were exceptional in this report. Charter reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 39.1, representing a change of 3.00% from the last report. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 77. Also, Charter reported impressive EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 22.2B, representing 0.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 17.24%. The company is headed in the right direction regarding EBITDA, exhibiting efficient capital controls and strong overall financial performance. Consequently, their EBITDA movement received a grade of 73. At the same time, one critical income statement metric, Revenue Efficiency, was notably weak. Charter management did an underwhelming job managing revenue efficiency this past period. Charter's revenue efficiency is 54.5B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 1.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 11.83% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', isn't encouraging. Its revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 67. Therefore, it received a score of 72. cash flow Charter appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Charter presents exciting net cash flow numbers for its recent financial release, illustrated by a net cash flow of -1.9B, which is a change of -4411.00% from the last filing. This industry-leading net cash flow momentum should reinforce broader positive momentum for its's stock price going forward. Consequently, their net cash flow movement received a grade of 71. Also, Charter is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.4, representing a 0.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 2.38% percent by this parameter. Its asset turnover metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its asset turnover movement earned a score of 68. At the same time, one critical cash flow metric, Capital Expenditure, was notably weak. Charter's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were discouraging and reflected management's unbalanced growth strategy. Charter recorded CapEx of -10.0B, which represents a -6.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more uninspiring relative to their peers and competitors. Its CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 54. Consequently, their cash flow earned a score of 68. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Charter's stock is now priced above its 5-day, but below its 50-day and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Charter's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 47.
19,691	fundamental summary According to their recent financial report, which was published on May 24, 2023, Cisco Systems had several impressive financial metrics that should make them more attractive than their peers going forward. Their positive income and value factors indicate that it is likely to continue to produce impressive results for the foreseeable future, as well. These results lead us to believe that there should be significant upside potential for the stock. We gave Cisco Systems a 80 rating and a BUY recommendation. balance sheet Cisco Systems appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Cisco Systems reported solid equity numbers this period. At filing, equity was reported as 42.3B, representing 2.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 5.93% percent by this parameter. These equity changes appear exceptionally balanced and impressive objectively compared to their peers. The company's equity movement component, therefore, received a grade of 84. Also, Cisco Systems is doing a good job of keeping its liabilities under control and growing intelligently. At filing, their liabilities were 55.2B, representing 2.00% change from the previous period. These liabilities changes appear balanced compared to their peers and project the message that management is capable and focused on balancing asset growth, resource allocation, and growing liabilities. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 79. That said, one metric, Cash & Equivalents, stood out as particularly concerning. Cisco Systems reported concerning cash and cash equivalents metrics in this filing. Specifically, they reported that cash and cash equivalents were 8.0B, representing a -11.00% change from the last period. The company's cash and cash equivalents metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Consequently, their cash and cash equivalents movement received a grade of 54. Consequently, the company's balance sheet earned a rank of 84. income statement Return Factors and EBITDA stand out as the most significant drivers of Cisco Systems's income statement's strength. Return factors metrics and ratios were exceptional in this report. Cisco Systems reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 27.7, representing a change of -1.00% from the last report. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. The company's return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 79. Also, Cisco Systems's management did a remarkable job this period managing its EBITDA. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 16.9B, which represents a 3.00% change from the last period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 14.29%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 77. That said, one metric, Revenue Efficiency, stood out as particularly concerning. Cisco Systems's revenue efficiency metrics look especially concerning this period, highlighting issues management is having controlling and reducing expenses while increasing earnings. This metric might have a 19.93% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency does not make a compelling case for upward pressure on the company's stock price. As a result, their revenue efficiency earned a score of 56. Therefore, we scored its income statement a 66. cash flow Cisco Systems appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Cisco Systems is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.6, representing a 3.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 20.80% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their impressive asset turnover metrics, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support a tailwind in the company's stock price. The company's asset turnover movement, therefore, received a grade of 77. Also, Cisco Systems's published free cash flow numbers were substantial and reflected management's focus on a healthy change strategy. Cisco Systems recorded free cash flow of 4.1, which represents a 9.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 4.19%. The company's free cash flow metrics are especially strong compared to its peers. Management seems to balance cash flow management, asset growth, and resource allocations in general. The company's free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 71. However, one discouraging result, Capital Expenditure, stood out. Cisco Systems's management did not a remarkable job this period managing capital expenditures (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -668.0M, which represents a -33.00% change from the last period. They appears to be headed in the wrong direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Therefore, their CapEx movement component earned a score of 42. Because the company's management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash flow was given a score of 69. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Cisco Systems's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Cisco Systems's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 73.
19,691	fundamental summary According to their recent financial report, which was published on May 24, 2023, Cisco Systems had several impressive financial metrics that should make them more attractive than their peers going forward. Their positive income and value factors indicate that it is likely to continue to produce impressive results for the foreseeable future, as well. These results lead us to believe that there should be significant upside potential for the stock. We gave Cisco Systems a 80 rating and a BUY recommendation. balance sheet Cisco Systems appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Cisco Systems reported solid equity numbers this period. At filing, equity was reported as 42.3B, representing 2.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 5.93% percent by this parameter. These equity changes appear exceptionally balanced and impressive objectively compared to their peers. The company's equity movement component, therefore, received a grade of 84. Also, Cisco Systems is doing a good job of keeping its liabilities under control and growing intelligently. At filing, their liabilities were 55.2B, representing 2.00% change from the previous period. These liabilities changes appear balanced compared to their peers and project the message that management is capable and focused on balancing asset growth, resource allocation, and growing liabilities. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 79. That said, one metric, Cash & Equivalents, stood out as particularly concerning. Cisco Systems reported concerning cash and cash equivalents metrics in this filing. Specifically, they reported that cash and cash equivalents were 8.0B, representing a -11.00% change from the last period. The company's cash and cash equivalents metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Consequently, their cash and cash equivalents movement received a grade of 54. Consequently, the company's balance sheet earned a rank of 84. income statement Return Factors and EBITDA stand out as the most significant drivers of Cisco Systems's income statement's strength. Return factors metrics and ratios were exceptional in this report. Cisco Systems reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 27.7, representing a change of -1.00% from the last report. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. The company's return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 79. Also, Cisco Systems's management did a remarkable job this period managing its EBITDA. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 16.9B, which represents a 3.00% change from the last period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 14.29%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 77. That said, one metric, Revenue Efficiency, stood out as particularly concerning. Cisco Systems's revenue efficiency metrics look especially concerning this period, highlighting issues management is having controlling and reducing expenses while increasing earnings. This metric might have a 19.93% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency does not make a compelling case for upward pressure on the company's stock price. As a result, their revenue efficiency earned a score of 56. Therefore, we scored its income statement a 66. cash flow Cisco Systems appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Cisco Systems is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.6, representing a 3.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 20.80% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their impressive asset turnover metrics, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support a tailwind in the company's stock price. The company's asset turnover movement, therefore, received a grade of 77. Also, Cisco Systems's published free cash flow numbers were substantial and reflected management's focus on a healthy change strategy. Cisco Systems recorded free cash flow of 4.1, which represents a 9.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 4.19%. The company's free cash flow metrics are especially strong compared to its peers. Management seems to balance cash flow management, asset growth, and resource allocations in general. The company's free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 71. However, one discouraging result, Capital Expenditure, stood out. Cisco Systems's management did not a remarkable job this period managing capital expenditures (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -668.0M, which represents a -33.00% change from the last period. They appears to be headed in the wrong direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Therefore, their CapEx movement component earned a score of 42. Because the company's management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash flow was given a score of 69. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Cisco Systems's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Cisco Systems's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 73.
21,127	fundamental summary Intel Corporation published concerning discouraging results on Apr 28, 2023. Its value and income factors performance indicate that company management is missing key targets and not executing well in areas that matter most. These results suggest a challenging future for Intel Corporation's stock. As such, Intel Corporation received an overall score of 45 and a UNDERPERFORM recommendation. balance sheet A few metrics from Intel Corporation's current balance sheet were especially concerning: Cash & Equivalents and Equity. Intel's management did a relatively poor job managing cash and cash equivalents, which now sit at 8.2B and represents a -26.00% change from the last reporting period. This performance is significantly less impressive than its peers and competitors. Discouraging results like these statistically lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated their cash and cash equivalents with a score of 45. Also, Intel reported weak equity changes momentum this period. At filing, equity was reported as 98.1B, representing -3.00% change from the previous report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 5.93%. Their equity metrics appear unremarkable relative to their peers. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 45. However, one encouraging metric, Liabilities, stood out. In terms of liabilities, Intel published good numbers. Their reported liabilities were 84.9B, representing a 8.00% change from the previous report. These liabilities changes appear balanced compared to their peers and project the message that management is capable and focused on balancing asset growth, resource allocation, and growing liabilities. The company's liabilities movement component, therefore, received a grade of 77. Therefore, it received a cautionary score of 51. income statement Intel Corporation's income statement showed strong financials, specifically Revenue Efficiency and EBITDA. Intel did an excellent job managing its revenue efficiency this past period. Intel's revenue efficiency is 56.4B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a -11.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 19.93%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. As a result, its revenue efficiency earned a score of 95. Also, Intel reported impressive EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 10.6B, representing -34.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 14.29%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 42. On the other hand, Return Factors, jumped out as looking problematic. Intel's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was -2.8, representing a change of -135.00%. This metric might have a 2.58% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. The company's return factor metrics return on equity and return on assets are even more concerning when compared to their peers. Therefore, their return factors component earned a score of 38. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the income statement was given a score of 71. cash flow Intel Corporation's most recent cash flow report was not encouraging. Intel's produced underwhelming cash flow numbers in this filing. Net cash flow was reported as 2.0B, which is a -68.00% change from the last report. Their net cash flow momentum should be a cause for concern and could bring negative momentum for Intel's stock price going forward. Hence, their net cash flow earned a score of 40. Also, Intel did a poor job related to generating and maintaining strong free cash flow this period, which stood at -4.9, representing a -108.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 4.19% percent by this parameter. Their free cash flow situation is more concerning relative to their peers and competitors. Consequently, their free cash flow movement received a grade of 41. On the other hand, Asset Turnover, jumped out as looking rather positive. Intel's published asset turnover numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. Intel recorded asset turnover of 0.3, which represents a -13.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 20.80% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly more impressive when contrasted against their peers and competitors. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 53. Consequently, their cash flow earned a rank of 46. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Intel's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Intel's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 78.
21,127	fundamental summary Intel Corporation published concerning discouraging results on Apr 28, 2023. Its value and income factors performance indicate that company management is missing key targets and not executing well in areas that matter most. These results suggest a challenging future for Intel Corporation's stock. As such, Intel Corporation received an overall score of 45 and a UNDERPERFORM recommendation. balance sheet A few metrics from Intel Corporation's current balance sheet were especially concerning: Cash & Equivalents and Equity. Intel's management did a relatively poor job managing cash and cash equivalents, which now sit at 8.2B and represents a -26.00% change from the last reporting period. This performance is significantly less impressive than its peers and competitors. Discouraging results like these statistically lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated their cash and cash equivalents with a score of 45. Also, Intel reported weak equity changes momentum this period. At filing, equity was reported as 98.1B, representing -3.00% change from the previous report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 5.93%. Their equity metrics appear unremarkable relative to their peers. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 45. However, one encouraging metric, Liabilities, stood out. In terms of liabilities, Intel published good numbers. Their reported liabilities were 84.9B, representing a 8.00% change from the previous report. These liabilities changes appear balanced compared to their peers and project the message that management is capable and focused on balancing asset growth, resource allocation, and growing liabilities. The company's liabilities movement component, therefore, received a grade of 77. Therefore, it received a cautionary score of 51. income statement Intel Corporation's income statement showed strong financials, specifically Revenue Efficiency and EBITDA. Intel did an excellent job managing its revenue efficiency this past period. Intel's revenue efficiency is 56.4B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a -11.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 19.93%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. As a result, its revenue efficiency earned a score of 95. Also, Intel reported impressive EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 10.6B, representing -34.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 14.29%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 42. On the other hand, Return Factors, jumped out as looking problematic. Intel's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was -2.8, representing a change of -135.00%. This metric might have a 2.58% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. The company's return factor metrics return on equity and return on assets are even more concerning when compared to their peers. Therefore, their return factors component earned a score of 38. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the income statement was given a score of 71. cash flow Intel Corporation's most recent cash flow report was not encouraging. Intel's produced underwhelming cash flow numbers in this filing. Net cash flow was reported as 2.0B, which is a -68.00% change from the last report. Their net cash flow momentum should be a cause for concern and could bring negative momentum for Intel's stock price going forward. Hence, their net cash flow earned a score of 40. Also, Intel did a poor job related to generating and maintaining strong free cash flow this period, which stood at -4.9, representing a -108.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 4.19% percent by this parameter. Their free cash flow situation is more concerning relative to their peers and competitors. Consequently, their free cash flow movement received a grade of 41. On the other hand, Asset Turnover, jumped out as looking rather positive. Intel's published asset turnover numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. Intel recorded asset turnover of 0.3, which represents a -13.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 20.80% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly more impressive when contrasted against their peers and competitors. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 53. Consequently, their cash flow earned a rank of 46. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Intel's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Intel's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 78.
21,171	fundamental summary At a high level, the metrics from Intuit's Q1 financial report release were demonstrably positive. Their growth and value factors indicate a well-executed and balanced strategy, which is generating exciting growth. We expect that this positive performance will continue in the coming months, and anticipate that Intuit will maintain good momentum even in a challenging environment. We gave Intuit a 87 rating and a S.BUY recommendation. balance sheet Two main balance sheet metrics are driving the positive outlook for Intuit's financial strength going forward. Intuit's management was effective in improving its cash and cash equivalents metrics, which now sit at 3.7B. This represents 142.00% change from the last reporting period. This impressive growth, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. The company's cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 98. Also, Intuit did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 17.6B, representing a 11.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 5.93%. These metrics are all the more impressive relative to their peers and should support an upswing in their stock price. Therefore, its equity movement component earned a score of 96. That said, one metric, Book Value Factors, stood out as particularly concerning. Intuit's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 6.9 and represents -8.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 0.36%. Their book value factor metrics are even more concerning when compared to their peers. Disappointing results in book value factors typically precede negative pressure in stock prices, so its book value factors received a grade of 62. Their balance sheet received an overall score of 93. income statement Overall, Intuit's critical income statement metrics appear to strongly support positive growth going forward. Intuit's management was effective in improving its EBIDTA, which now sits at 3.9B and represents a 11.00% change from the last reporting period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 14.29%. Its EBITDA metrics highlight an impressive overall financial performance, which is expected to continue moving forward. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 88. Also, In this filing, Intuit reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 13.0, which represents a change of 5.00%. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. The company's return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 84. On the other hand, Revenue Efficiency, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Intuit's revenue efficiency metrics look especially concerning this period, highlighting issues management is having controlling and reducing expenses while increasing earnings. This metric might have a 19.93% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Its uninspiring revenue efficiency is even more concerning relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 58. Therefore, their income statement earned a grade of 73. cash flow Intuit appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Intuit presents exciting net cash flow numbers for its recent financial release, illustrated by a net cash flow of -120.0M, which is a change of -203.00% from the last filing. The company is headed in the right direction regarding business priorities, exhibiting prudent net cash flow management and growth. Consequently, their net cash flow movement received a grade of 78. Also, Intuit did a great job related to free cash flow this period, which stood at 15.1, representing a 6.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 4.19%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Therefore, its free cash flow movement earned a score of 70. That said, one metric, Capital Expenditure, stood out as particularly concerning. Intuit's management did not a remarkable job this period managing capital expenditures (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -209.0M, which represents a -15.00% change from the last period. The company's disappointing CapEx growth is expected to stunt the momentum they hoped for this period. Its CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 49. Because the company's management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash flow was given a score of 67. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Intuit's stock is now priced above its 200-day, but below its 5-day and 50-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the long-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Intuit's stock appears overbought. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 42.
21,171	fundamental summary At a high level, the metrics from Intuit's Q1 financial report release were demonstrably positive. Their growth and value factors indicate a well-executed and balanced strategy, which is generating exciting growth. We expect that this positive performance will continue in the coming months, and anticipate that Intuit will maintain good momentum even in a challenging environment. We gave Intuit a 87 rating and a S.BUY recommendation. balance sheet Two main balance sheet metrics are driving the positive outlook for Intuit's financial strength going forward. Intuit's management was effective in improving its cash and cash equivalents metrics, which now sit at 3.7B. This represents 142.00% change from the last reporting period. This impressive growth, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. The company's cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 98. Also, Intuit did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 17.6B, representing a 11.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 5.93%. These metrics are all the more impressive relative to their peers and should support an upswing in their stock price. Therefore, its equity movement component earned a score of 96. That said, one metric, Book Value Factors, stood out as particularly concerning. Intuit's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 6.9 and represents -8.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 0.36%. Their book value factor metrics are even more concerning when compared to their peers. Disappointing results in book value factors typically precede negative pressure in stock prices, so its book value factors received a grade of 62. Their balance sheet received an overall score of 93. income statement Overall, Intuit's critical income statement metrics appear to strongly support positive growth going forward. Intuit's management was effective in improving its EBIDTA, which now sits at 3.9B and represents a 11.00% change from the last reporting period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 14.29%. Its EBITDA metrics highlight an impressive overall financial performance, which is expected to continue moving forward. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 88. Also, In this filing, Intuit reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 13.0, which represents a change of 5.00%. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. The company's return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 84. On the other hand, Revenue Efficiency, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Intuit's revenue efficiency metrics look especially concerning this period, highlighting issues management is having controlling and reducing expenses while increasing earnings. This metric might have a 19.93% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Its uninspiring revenue efficiency is even more concerning relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 58. Therefore, their income statement earned a grade of 73. cash flow Intuit appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Intuit presents exciting net cash flow numbers for its recent financial release, illustrated by a net cash flow of -120.0M, which is a change of -203.00% from the last filing. The company is headed in the right direction regarding business priorities, exhibiting prudent net cash flow management and growth. Consequently, their net cash flow movement received a grade of 78. Also, Intuit did a great job related to free cash flow this period, which stood at 15.1, representing a 6.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 4.19%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Therefore, its free cash flow movement earned a score of 70. That said, one metric, Capital Expenditure, stood out as particularly concerning. Intuit's management did not a remarkable job this period managing capital expenditures (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -209.0M, which represents a -15.00% change from the last period. The company's disappointing CapEx growth is expected to stunt the momentum they hoped for this period. Its CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 49. Because the company's management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash flow was given a score of 67. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Intuit's stock is now priced above its 200-day, but below its 5-day and 50-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the long-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Intuit's stock appears overbought. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 42.
21,719	fundamental summary The financials published by S&P for Q1 were weak and discouraging. Their growth, value, and income factors indicate a poor execution and strategy, which isn't generating exciting growth. These troubling results make a strong case for underperformance and for anticipating a significant downside. Correspondingly, S&P received a ranking of 57 and a UNDERPERFORM recommendation. balance sheet Two main balance sheet metrics are driving the positive outlook for S&P's financial strength going forward. S&P did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 36.3B, representing a -0.00% change. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 6.45% percent by this parameter. These metrics are all the more impressive relative to their peers and should support an upswing in their stock price. Therefore, its equity movement component earned a score of 90. Also, S&P reported a positive trendline in their cash and cash equivalents metrics. Specifically, they reported that cash and cash equivalents were 1.4B, representing 9.00% change from the last report. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. It suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect its actual intrinsic value. The company's cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 77. On the other hand, Book Value Factors, jumped out as looking problematic. S&P's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 3.2 and represents 8.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 21.98%. Their book value factor metrics are even more concerning when compared to their peers. Consequently, their book value factors movement received a grade of 56. Their balance sheet received an overall score of 67. income statement S&P's recently published income statement conveys disappointing growth, particularly with respect to Return Factors and Revenue Efficiency metrics. S&P's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 7.4, representing a change of -52.00%. This metric might have a 14.26% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. They does not yet appear to be headed in the right direction regarding these return on equity and return on assets metrics. Its return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 46. Also, S&P reported discouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. As of the current filing, they were reported as 12.0B and represented 7.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 7.00% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Its uninspiring revenue efficiency is even more concerning relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. Its revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 51. That said, one metric, EBITDA, stood out as strongly positive. S&P reported impressive EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 5.7B, representing 12.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 11.80%. The company is headed in the right direction regarding EBITDA, exhibiting efficient capital controls and strong overall financial performance. Consequently, their EBITDA movement received a grade of 71. Because of these weaknesses, their income statement received an overall score of 56. cash flow A few key cash flow metrics in this report were discouraging. Asset turnover metrics during this period were surprisingly weak. Their reported asset turnover metrics of 0.2, which represents a -36.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 4.53%. The company's asset turnover metrics seem especially problematic relative to their peers. Underwhelming results in asset turnover metrics often lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated its asset turnover momentum 40. Also, S&P's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were discouraging and reflected management's unbalanced growth strategy. S&P recorded CapEx of -101.0M, which represents a -13.00% change from the previous report. They appears to be headed in the wrong direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Consequently, their CapEx movement received a grade of 51. At the same time, one {cash_flow} metric, Free Cash flow, was actually strongly positive. Free cash flow numbers published by S&P were 8.8, which was a 10.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 2.09%. The company's free cash flow metrics are especially strong compared to its peers. Management seems to balance cash flow management, asset growth, and resource allocations in general. Therefore, its free cash flow movement earned a score of 75. their cash flow, therefore, earned a score of 45. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. S&P's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), S&P's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 73.
21,835	fundamental summary According to their recent financial report, which was published on Apr 25, 2023, Microsoft Corporation had several impressive financial metrics that should make them more attractive than their peers going forward. Their positive growth and value factors indicate that the company is likely to continue to produce impressive results for the foreseeable future, as well. There should be significant upside potential for the stock looking forward. We therefore gave Microsoft Corporation a total score of 80 out of 100 and a BUY recommendation. balance sheet Microsoft Corporation appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Microsoft reported a positive trendline in their cash and cash equivalents metrics. Specifically, they reported that cash and cash equivalents were 26.6B, representing 70.00% change from the last report. This impressive growth, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. The company's cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 97. Also, Microsoft produced great equity metrics for this filing, demonstrating management's skill in increasing shareholder value. Microsoft's equity was reported as 194.7B, which represents a 6.00% change from the last report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 5.93%. These metrics are all the more impressive relative to their peers and should support an upswing in their stock price. The company's equity movement component, therefore, received a grade of 93. On the other hand, Assets, jumped out as looking problematic. Microsoft assets metrics were reported as 380.1B, representing a 4.00% change from the last filing. This unimpressive metric is weaker than its peers and competitors. Therefore, their asset component earned a score of 64. Therefore, we scored the company's balance sheet a 92. income statement Microsoft Corporation appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Microsoft's management was effective in improving its EBIDTA, which now sits at 102.9B and represents a 2.00% change from the last reporting period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 14.29%. Its EBITDA metrics highlight an impressive overall financial performance, which is expected to continue moving forward. Therefore, its EBITDA component earned a score of 76. Also, In this filing, Microsoft reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 38.6, which represents a change of -2.00%. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. The company's return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 75. That said, one metric, Revenue Efficiency, stood out as particularly concerning. Microsoft management did an underwhelming job managing revenue efficiency this past period. Microsoft's revenue efficiency is 207.6B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 2.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 19.93% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', isn't encouraging. Its revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 63. Therefore, their income statement earned a grade of 70. cash flow Two main cash flow metrics, Asset Turnover and Net Cash Flow, are driving the positive outlook for Microsoft Corporation's financial strength. Microsoft's published asset turnover numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. Microsoft recorded asset turnover of 0.6, which represents a -1.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 20.80% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly more impressive when contrasted against their peers and competitors. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 64. Also, Microsoft's strong net cash flow numbers, which were 14.1B in this filing, showed a 384.00% change from the last period. This industry-leading net cash flow momentum should reinforce broader positive momentum for its's stock price going forward. Hence, its net cash flow earned a score of 62. That said, one metric, Capital Expenditure, stood out as particularly concerning. Microsoft's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were discouraging and reflected management's unbalanced growth strategy. Microsoft recorded CapEx of -26.0B, which represents a -5.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more uninspiring relative to their peers and competitors. Consequently, their CapEx movement received a grade of 57. Its cash flow received an overall score of 61. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Microsoft's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Microsoft's stock appears overbought. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 68.
21,835	fundamental summary According to their recent financial report, which was published on Apr 25, 2023, Microsoft Corporation had several impressive financial metrics that should make them more attractive than their peers going forward. Their positive growth and value factors indicate that the company is likely to continue to produce impressive results for the foreseeable future, as well. There should be significant upside potential for the stock looking forward. We therefore gave Microsoft Corporation a total score of 80 out of 100 and a BUY recommendation. balance sheet Microsoft Corporation appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Microsoft reported a positive trendline in their cash and cash equivalents metrics. Specifically, they reported that cash and cash equivalents were 26.6B, representing 70.00% change from the last report. This impressive growth, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. The company's cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 97. Also, Microsoft produced great equity metrics for this filing, demonstrating management's skill in increasing shareholder value. Microsoft's equity was reported as 194.7B, which represents a 6.00% change from the last report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 5.93%. These metrics are all the more impressive relative to their peers and should support an upswing in their stock price. The company's equity movement component, therefore, received a grade of 93. On the other hand, Assets, jumped out as looking problematic. Microsoft assets metrics were reported as 380.1B, representing a 4.00% change from the last filing. This unimpressive metric is weaker than its peers and competitors. Therefore, their asset component earned a score of 64. Therefore, we scored the company's balance sheet a 92. income statement Microsoft Corporation appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Microsoft's management was effective in improving its EBIDTA, which now sits at 102.9B and represents a 2.00% change from the last reporting period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 14.29%. Its EBITDA metrics highlight an impressive overall financial performance, which is expected to continue moving forward. Therefore, its EBITDA component earned a score of 76. Also, In this filing, Microsoft reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 38.6, which represents a change of -2.00%. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. The company's return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 75. That said, one metric, Revenue Efficiency, stood out as particularly concerning. Microsoft management did an underwhelming job managing revenue efficiency this past period. Microsoft's revenue efficiency is 207.6B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 2.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 19.93% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', isn't encouraging. Its revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 63. Therefore, their income statement earned a grade of 70. cash flow Two main cash flow metrics, Asset Turnover and Net Cash Flow, are driving the positive outlook for Microsoft Corporation's financial strength. Microsoft's published asset turnover numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. Microsoft recorded asset turnover of 0.6, which represents a -1.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 20.80% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly more impressive when contrasted against their peers and competitors. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 64. Also, Microsoft's strong net cash flow numbers, which were 14.1B in this filing, showed a 384.00% change from the last period. This industry-leading net cash flow momentum should reinforce broader positive momentum for its's stock price going forward. Hence, its net cash flow earned a score of 62. That said, one metric, Capital Expenditure, stood out as particularly concerning. Microsoft's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were discouraging and reflected management's unbalanced growth strategy. Microsoft recorded CapEx of -26.0B, which represents a -5.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more uninspiring relative to their peers and competitors. Consequently, their CapEx movement received a grade of 57. Its cash flow received an overall score of 61. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Microsoft's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Microsoft's stock appears overbought. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 68.
22,247	fundamental summary Oracle's recently released results from Q1 indicate that Oracle is performing reasonably well and on par with its peers. We do believe, though, that macro-related market conditions will influence Oracle's performance more significantly than its individual results. Bottom line, Oracle's financials indicate solid performance in terms of income and value, which leads us to believe that they may become interesting again in the next few months. But for right now, we gave the company an overall grade of 73 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Two main balance sheet metrics are driving the positive outlook for Oracle's financial strength going forward. Oracle reported a positive trendline in their cash and cash equivalents metrics. Specifically, they reported that cash and cash equivalents were 8.2B, representing 21.00% change from the last report. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. It suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect its actual intrinsic value. The company's cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 88. Also, Oracle reported solid equity numbers this period. At filing, equity was reported as -2.4B, representing 43.00% change from the previous period. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 5.93%. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 84. However, one discouraging result, Book Value Factors, stood out. Oracle's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as -107.0 and represents -103.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 0.36%. Their book value factor metrics are even more concerning when compared to their peers. Disappointing results in book value factors typically precede negative pressure in stock prices, so its book value factors received a grade of 56. Their balance sheet received an overall score of 81. income statement EBITDA and Return Factors stand out as the most significant drivers of Oracle's income statement's strength. Oracle reported impressive EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 19.4B, representing 1.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 14.29%. The company is headed in the right direction regarding EBITDA, exhibiting efficient capital controls and strong overall financial performance. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 72. Also, Oracle's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was -165.4, representing a change of -26.00%. The company appears headed in the right direction in terms of these return factors, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 58. That said, one metric, Revenue Efficiency, stood out as particularly concerning. Oracle reported discouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. As of the current filing, they were reported as 48.0B and represented 4.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 19.93% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Its uninspiring revenue efficiency is even more concerning relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. Its revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 53. Therefore, it received a score of 61. cash flow Oracle appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Oracle is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.4, representing a 2.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 20.80% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their impressive asset turnover metrics, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support a tailwind in the company's stock price. Therefore, its asset turnover movement earned a score of 84. Also, Oracle presents exciting net cash flow numbers for its recent financial release, illustrated by a net cash flow of -14.5B, which is a change of -30.00% from the last filing. The company is headed in the right direction regarding business priorities, exhibiting prudent net cash flow management and growth. The company's net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 56. At the same time, one critical cash flow metric, Capital Expenditure, was notably weak. Oracle's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were discouraging and reflected management's unbalanced growth strategy. Oracle recorded CapEx of -8.2B, which represents a -23.00% change from the previous report. The company's disappointing CapEx growth is expected to stunt the momentum they hoped for this period. Therefore, their CapEx movement component earned a score of 44. Therefore, we scored the company's cash flow a 69. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Oracle's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Oracle's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 78.
22,623	fundamental summary Raymond James published its Q1 report on May 08, 2023 with positive results, but no significant factors particularly remarkable relative to its peers. It is highly likely that the company will be mostly tethered to market performance and sector movements for the near term. Bottom line, Raymond James's financials indicate solid performance in terms of value and growth, which leads us to believe that they may become interesting again in the next few months. But for right now, we gave the company an overall grade of 76 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Raymond James's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Raymond James reported solid equity numbers this period. At filing, equity was reported as 9.9B, representing 1.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 6.45% percent by this parameter. These metrics are all the more impressive relative to their peers and should support an upswing in their stock price. Therefore, its equity movement component earned a score of 95. Also, Raymond James's management was effective in improving its cash and cash equivalents metrics, which now sit at 8.7B. This represents 40.00% change from the last reporting period. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. It suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect its actual intrinsic value. The company's cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 88. That said, one metric, Assets, stood out as particularly concerning. Mediocre performance in terms of assets could drop the bar on expectations for Raymond James's future attractiveness, as they changed to 79.2B in the latest filing. This works out to a 3.00% change from the last period. The lack of good news about assets momentum should be a cause for concern and is often met with downward pressure on the company's stock price. Its asset component, therefore, received a grade of 60. Therefore, we scored the company's balance sheet a 81. income statement Raymond James appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics, especially Return Factors. Raymond James's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 18.0, representing a change of 6.00%. The company appears headed in the right direction in terms of these return factors, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 77. That said, one metric, Revenue Efficiency, stood out as strongly negative. Raymond James management did an underwhelming job managing revenue efficiency this past period. Raymond James's revenue efficiency is 11.0B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 2.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 7.00% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', isn't encouraging. Its revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 69. their income statement received an overall score of 74. cash flow Raymond James's cash flow factors had several troubling metrics this period. Raymond James's published free cash flow numbers were subpar and could mean that management has lost focus on achieving healthy growth. Raymond James recorded free cash flow of -12.3, which represents -199.00% growth from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 2.09% percent by this parameter. Their free cash flow situation is more concerning relative to their peers and competitors. Consequently, their free cash flow movement received a grade of 39. Also, Raymond James's asset turnover metrics were concerning and highlighted potential issues management is having effectively turning assets into sales efficiently. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.1, representing a -3.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 4.53%. The company's asset turnover metrics seem especially problematic relative to their peers. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 46. However, we can we draw some encouragement from Raymond James's momentum in cash flow generation. Raymond James's strong net cash flow numbers, which were -1.5B in this filing, showed a 47.00% change from the last period. This industry-leading net cash flow momentum should reinforce broader positive momentum for its's stock price going forward. Consequently, their net cash flow movement received a grade of 67. Therefore, it received a cautionary score of 43. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Raymond James's stock is now priced above its 5-day and 50-day, but below its 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in both the short and medium-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Raymond James's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 62.
22,751	fundamental summary Roper published its Q1 report on May 03, 2023 with positive results, but no significant factors particularly remarkable relative to its peers. It is highly likely that it will be mostly tethered to market performance and sector movements for the near term. We therefore gave Roper a total score of 67 out of 100 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Roper appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Roper reported a positive trendline in their cash and cash equivalents metrics. Specifically, they reported that cash and cash equivalents were 1.2B, representing 49.00% change from the last report. This impressive growth, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. Therefore, its cash and cash equivalents movement earned a score of 95. Also, Roper's management was effective in managing the value of the assets on their balance sheet, which now sits at 27.1B and represents a 1.00% change from the previous report. This performance is interesting in comparison to its peers and competitors. Therefore, its asset component earned a score of 79. However, one concerning metric, Liabilities, stood out. In terms of liabilities, Roper published uninspiring results. Their reported liabilities were 10.8B, representing a -1.00% change from the previous report. This performance is relatively weak in comparison to their peers and suggests that its's stock price will likely suffer until this is solved. Its liabilities movement component, therefore, received a grade of 67. Therefore, the company's balance sheet earned a grade of 75. income statement Roper appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Roper's management was effective in improving its EBIDTA, which now sits at 2.3B and represents a 3.00% change from the last reporting period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 14.29%. Its EBITDA metrics highlight an impressive overall financial performance, which is expected to continue moving forward. Therefore, its EBITDA component earned a score of 73. Also, In this filing, Roper reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 6.9, which represents a change of -3.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 68. On the other hand, Revenue Efficiency, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Roper management did an underwhelming job managing revenue efficiency this past period. Roper's revenue efficiency is 5.6B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 4.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 19.93% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', isn't encouraging. Its revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 55. Therefore, we scored its income statement a 63. cash flow Overall, Roper's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Roper is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.2, representing a -1.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 20.80% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Its asset turnover metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its asset turnover movement earned a score of 73. Also, Roper's published free cash flow numbers were substantial and reflected management's focus on a healthy change strategy. Roper recorded free cash flow of 6.1, which represents a -3.00% change from the previous report. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 4.19%. The company's free cash flow metrics are especially strong compared to its peers. Management seems to balance cash flow management, asset growth, and resource allocations in general. Therefore, its free cash flow movement earned a score of 59. On the other hand, Net Cash Flow, jumped out as looking problematic. Roper's management was not successful in meaningfully improving their cash flow metrics. As of the current filing, they were reported as -2.1B and represented a -566.00% change from the previous period. Roper's net cash flow metrics are especially disappointing relative to their peers. Consequently, their net cash flow movement received a grade of 51. Its cash flow, therefore, earned a score of 63. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Roper's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Roper's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 73.
23,217	fundamental summary T. Rowe Price's recently released results from Q1 indicate that T. Rowe Price is performing reasonably well and on par with its peers. Its growth, value, and income factors all individually appear positive and give support for optimism regarding the likelihood of continued positive performance. Therefore, they earned a total score of 63 out of 100 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Overall, T. Rowe Price's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. In terms of liabilities, T. Rowe Price published good numbers. Their reported liabilities were 2.1B, representing a 6.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all interesting relative to their peers and suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect a higher intrinsic value. These results statistically lead to positive movement in stock prices, so we rated its liabilities movement component 88. Also, T. Rowe Price's management was effective in improving its cash and cash equivalents metrics, which now sit at 2.1B. This represents 19.00% change from the last reporting period. This impressive growth, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. The company's cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 82. On the other hand, Equity, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. T. Rowe Price management produced disappointing equity metrics this period, which stood at 9.0B, representing a 2.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 6.45%. This performance is significantly less impressive than its peers and competitors. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 52. The company's balance sheet, Therefore, earned a score of 72. income statement Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the income statement's strength in T. Rowe Price's recent report: Revenue Efficiency and Return Factors. T. Rowe Price did an excellent job managing its revenue efficiency this past period. T. Rowe Price's revenue efficiency is 6.2B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a -5.00% change from the previous report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 7.00%. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', should support a positive movement in the company's stock price. As a result, its revenue efficiency earned a score of 93. Also, In this filing, T. Rowe Price reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 13.6, which represents a change of -6.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 57. That said, one metric, EBITDA, stood out as strongly negative. T. Rowe Price's management didn't make significant improvements to their EBITDA this period. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 2.8B, which represents a -12.00% change from the last period. This metric might have a 11.80% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. The company's EBITDA metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Its EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 52. Its income statement, therefore, earned a score of 60. cash flow Results from T. Rowe Price's current financials were concerning, in two areas in particular: Asset Turnover and Free Cash flow. T. Rowe Price's asset turnover numbers were discouraging, reflecting significant concerns related to management's ability to leverage assets to generate sales effectively and efficiently. T. Rowe Price recorded asset turnover of 0.5, which represents a -6.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 4.53%. The company's asset turnover metrics seem especially problematic relative to their peers. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 45. Also, T. Rowe Price's published free cash flow numbers were subpar and could mean that management has lost focus on achieving healthy growth. T. Rowe Price recorded free cash flow of 6.8, which represents -28.00% growth from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 2.09% percent by this parameter. their free cash flow situation appears to be much weaker than their peers. Management needs to do a better job balancing cash flow, asset growth, and resources allocations in general. Its free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 51. However, we can we draw some encouragement from T. Rowe Price's momentum in cash flow generation. T. Rowe Price's management was effective in improving their net cash flow, which now sits at 101.6M and represents a -59.00% change from the previous report. Their net cash flow metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. The company's net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 69. Therefore, it received a cautionary score of 50. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. T. Rowe Price's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), T. Rowe Price's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 78.
24,321	fundamental summary Adobe published its Q1 report on Mar 29, 2023 with positive results, but no significant factors particularly remarkable relative to its peers. It is highly likely that the company will be mostly tethered to market performance and sector movements for the near term. As such, Adobe received an overall score of 71 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Adobe appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Adobe publishes impressive results related to book value factors in this report. Specifically, price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 12.0 and represents a 7.00% change from the previous report. The company's book value factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. The company's book value factors component, therefore, received a grade of 70. Also, Adobe's management was effective in managing the value of the assets on their balance sheet, which now sits at 26.7B and represents a -2.00% change from the previous report. These results, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. Consequently, their asset movement received a grade of 69. However, one discouraging result, Liabilities, stood out. At filing, Adobe's liabilities were 12.5B, representing a -5.00% change from the previous period. These liabilities metrics show that management has been unsuccessful in encouraging healthy growth while managing liabilities. Its liabilities movement component, therefore, received a grade of 57. The company's balance sheet received an overall score of 61. income statement Overall, Adobe's critical income statement metrics appear to strongly support positive growth going forward. In this filing, Adobe reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 33.9, which represents a change of 3.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 81. Also, Adobe's management did a remarkable job this period managing its EBITDA. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 6.8B, which represents a 0.00% change from the last period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 14.29%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its EBITDA component earned a score of 72. On the other hand, Revenue Efficiency, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Adobe management did an underwhelming job managing revenue efficiency this past period. Adobe's revenue efficiency is 18.0B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 2.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 19.93% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', isn't encouraging. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 61. Therefore, their income statement earned a grade of 67. cash flow Overall, Adobe's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Adobe is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.7, representing a 6.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 20.80% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Its asset turnover metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 85. Also, Adobe's management did a great job this period managing its capital expenditure (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -443.0M, which represents a -0.00% change from the last period. This remarkable CapEx growth is expected to reinforce upward momentum for its's stock price going forward. The company's CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 65. On the other hand, Free Cash flow, jumped out as looking problematic. Adobe did a poor job related to generating and maintaining strong free cash flow this period, which stood at 15.7, representing a -0.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 4.19%. Their free cash flow situation is more concerning relative to their peers and competitors. Consequently, their free cash flow movement received a grade of 61. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash flow was given a score of 75. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Adobe's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Adobe's stock appears overbought. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 73.
24,321	fundamental summary Adobe published its Q1 report on Mar 29, 2023 with positive results, but no significant factors particularly remarkable relative to its peers. It is highly likely that the company will be mostly tethered to market performance and sector movements for the near term. As such, Adobe received an overall score of 71 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Adobe appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Adobe publishes impressive results related to book value factors in this report. Specifically, price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 12.0 and represents a 7.00% change from the previous report. The company's book value factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. The company's book value factors component, therefore, received a grade of 70. Also, Adobe's management was effective in managing the value of the assets on their balance sheet, which now sits at 26.7B and represents a -2.00% change from the previous report. These results, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. Consequently, their asset movement received a grade of 69. However, one discouraging result, Liabilities, stood out. At filing, Adobe's liabilities were 12.5B, representing a -5.00% change from the previous period. These liabilities metrics show that management has been unsuccessful in encouraging healthy growth while managing liabilities. Its liabilities movement component, therefore, received a grade of 57. The company's balance sheet received an overall score of 61. income statement Overall, Adobe's critical income statement metrics appear to strongly support positive growth going forward. In this filing, Adobe reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 33.9, which represents a change of 3.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 81. Also, Adobe's management did a remarkable job this period managing its EBITDA. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 6.8B, which represents a 0.00% change from the last period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 14.29%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its EBITDA component earned a score of 72. On the other hand, Revenue Efficiency, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Adobe management did an underwhelming job managing revenue efficiency this past period. Adobe's revenue efficiency is 18.0B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 2.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 19.93% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', isn't encouraging. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 61. Therefore, their income statement earned a grade of 67. cash flow Overall, Adobe's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Adobe is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.7, representing a 6.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 20.80% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Its asset turnover metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 85. Also, Adobe's management did a great job this period managing its capital expenditure (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -443.0M, which represents a -0.00% change from the last period. This remarkable CapEx growth is expected to reinforce upward momentum for its's stock price going forward. The company's CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 65. On the other hand, Free Cash flow, jumped out as looking problematic. Adobe did a poor job related to generating and maintaining strong free cash flow this period, which stood at 15.7, representing a -0.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 4.19%. Their free cash flow situation is more concerning relative to their peers and competitors. Consequently, their free cash flow movement received a grade of 61. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash flow was given a score of 75. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Adobe's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Adobe's stock appears overbought. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 73.
24,333	fundamental summary At a high level, the metrics from Advance Auto Parts, Inc.'s Q1 financial report release were demonstrably negative. Their negative income, growth, and value factors indicate that the company is finding it increasingly difficult to produce impressive numbers. These results indicate a weak growth potential for Advance Auto Parts, Inc.'s stock's price moving forward. Therefore, Advance Auto Parts, Inc. earned a score of 54 and a UNDERPERFORM recommendation. balance sheet A few key balance sheet metrics in this report were discouraging. Advance Auto Parts management produced disappointing equity metrics this period, which stood at 2.6B, representing a -2.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 9.58%. These metrics are all the more disappointing relative to their peers and should blunt potential positive momentum in its's stock price. Therefore, their equity movement component earned a score of 46. Also, At filing, Advance Auto Parts's liabilities were 9.5B, representing a 2.00% change from the previous period. This performance is relatively weak in comparison to their peers and suggests that its's stock price will likely suffer until this is solved. Its liabilities movement component, therefore, received a grade of 51. However, one encouraging metric, Book Value Factors, stood out. Advance Auto Parts publishes impressive results related to book value factors in this report. Specifically, price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 1.5 and represents a nan% change from the previous report. These book value factor numbers show that management has been prudent in focusing on efficient growth. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Consequently, their book value factors movement received a grade of 91. Because of these weaknesses, its balance sheet received an overall score of 51. income statement Results from Advance Auto Parts, Inc.'s current financials were concerning, in two areas in particular: EBITDA and Return Factors. Advance Auto Parts's management didn't make significant improvements to their EBITDA this period. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 1.6B, which represents a -10.00% change from the last period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 18.51%. The company's EBITDA metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Its EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 44. Also, Advance Auto Parts's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 14.6, representing a change of -16.00%. This metric might have a 11.08% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. The company's return factor metrics return on equity and return on assets are even more concerning when compared to their peers. Its return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 46. That said, one metric, Revenue Efficiency, stood out as strongly positive. Advance Auto Parts did an excellent job managing its revenue efficiency this past period. Advance Auto Parts's revenue efficiency is 11.2B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 0.00% change from the previous report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 13.65%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 82. Therefore, their income statement earned a grade of 54. cash flow Overall, Advance Auto Parts, Inc.'s critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Advance Auto Parts's management was effective in improving its CapEx, which now sits at -398.2M and represents 6.00% change from the previous report. The company appears to be headed in the right direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. The company's CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 85. Also, Advance Auto Parts is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.9, representing a 1.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 7.00% percent by this parameter. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly more impressive when contrasted against their peers and competitors. Therefore, its asset turnover movement earned a score of 76. That said, one metric, Free Cash flow, stood out as strongly negative. Advance Auto Parts did a poor job related to generating and maintaining strong free cash flow this period, which stood at -0.1, representing a -101.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 1.71% percent by this parameter. Their free cash flow situation is more concerning relative to their peers and competitors. Its free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 39. Consequently, the company's cash flow earned a score of 64. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Advance Auto Parts's stock is now priced below its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a negative setup in the near, medium, and long-term. The company is trading near it's 12-month low, which signals it struggle to keep above it support price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Advance Auto Parts's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 37.
24,522	fundamental summary Looking at Akamai's financials of Q1 reflected decent results. It is highly likely that it will be mostly tethered to market performance and sector movements for the near term. As such, Akamai received an overall score of 66 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the balance sheet strength in Akamai's recent report: Liabilities and Assets. Akamai has done an excellent job managing its liabilities. Akamai's liabilities stood at 4.0B in the current filing, which represents a 2.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all interesting relative to their peers and suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect a higher intrinsic value. The company's liabilities movement component, therefore, received a grade of 78. Also, The company's assets section could set high expectations for Akamai's future attractiveness, as they went to 8.2B, which is a -1.00% change from the last period. This performance is interesting in comparison to its peers and competitors. Consequently, their asset movement received a grade of 65. On the other hand, Cash & Equivalents, jumped out as looking problematic. Akamai did a poor job related to managing cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 298.8M, representing a -45.00% change from the previous filing. The company's cash and cash equivalents metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Consequently, their cash and cash equivalents movement received a grade of 39. The company's balance sheet received an overall score of 67. income statement Akamai appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Akamai reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 19.93%. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', should support a positive movement in the company's stock price. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 69. Also, Akamai's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 11.5, representing a change of -2.00%. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 67. That said, one metric, EBITDA, stood out as strongly negative. Akamai's EBIDTA now sits at 1.4B and represents -2.00% change from the last reporting period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 14.29%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more problematic when compared to their peers. Therefore, their EBITDA component earned a score of 64. Consequently, their income statement earned a rank of 68. cash flow Overall, Akamai's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Akamai's strong net cash flow numbers, which were -79.4M in this filing, showed a -1606.00% change from the last period. The company is headed in the right direction regarding business priorities, exhibiting prudent net cash flow management and growth. Hence, its net cash flow earned a score of 76. Also, Akamai's published asset turnover numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. Akamai recorded asset turnover of 0.4, which represents a 0.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 20.80%. Its asset turnover metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 66. On the other hand, Capital Expenditure, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Akamai's management did not a remarkable job this period managing capital expenditures (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -332.0M, which represents a -38.00% change from the last period. The company's disappointing CapEx growth is expected to stunt the momentum they hoped for this period. Its CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 41. Its cash flow received an overall score of 64. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Akamai's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Akamai's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 68.
24,568	fundamental summary Align published its Q1 report on May 05, 2023 with positive results, but no significant factors particularly remarkable relative to its peers. This typically translates into the stock performing on par with market performance for the upcoming quarter. Therefore, Align received an overall score of 75, translating into a HOLD ranking. balance sheet Align appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Align reported solid equity numbers this period. At filing, equity was reported as 3.5B, representing -3.00% change from the previous period. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 9.65%. These equity changes appear exceptionally balanced and impressive objectively compared to their peers. Therefore, its equity movement component earned a score of 83. Also, Align is doing a good job of keeping its liabilities under control and growing intelligently. At filing, their liabilities were 2.4B, representing 3.00% change from the previous period. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing liabilities, especially relative to their peers. These results statistically lead to positive movement in stock prices, so we rated its liabilities movement component 72. That said, one metric, Cash & Equivalents, stood out as particularly concerning. Align reported concerning cash and cash equivalents metrics in this filing. Specifically, they reported that cash and cash equivalents were 832.4M, representing a -12.00% change from the last period. The company's cash and cash equivalents metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Its cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 56. Consequently, the company's balance sheet earned a rank of 73. income statement Align appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Align reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 15.78%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 83. Also, Align's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 8.8, representing a change of -12.00%. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. The company's return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 73. On the other hand, EBITDA, jumped out as looking problematic. Align reported concerning EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 788.2M, representing -6.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 30.38% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their EBITDA metrics are even more problematic when compared to their peers. Therefore, their EBITDA component earned a score of 60. As the companie's management is doing an excellent job managing the critical metrics, the income statement was given a score of 68. cash flow Align appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Free cash flow numbers published by Align were 6.0, which was a 71.00% change from the previous filing. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 0.97%. The company's free cash flow metrics are especially strong compared to its peers. Management seems to balance cash flow management, asset growth, and resource allocations in general. Consequently, their free cash flow movement received a grade of 93. Also, Align's strong net cash flow numbers, which were -94.2M in this filing, showed a 40.00% change from the last period. Their net cash flow metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. Consequently, their net cash flow movement received a grade of 83. At the same time, one critical cash flow metric, Asset Turnover, was notably weak. Align's asset turnover numbers were discouraging, reflecting significant concerns related to management's ability to leverage assets to generate sales effectively and efficiently. Align recorded asset turnover of 0.6, which represents a -0.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 2.11%. The company's asset turnover metrics seem especially problematic relative to their peers. Underwhelming results in asset turnover metrics often lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated its asset turnover momentum 69. Because the company's management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash flow was given a score of 87. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Align's stock is now priced above its 5-day and 200-day, but below its 50-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Align's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 52.
24,568	fundamental summary Align published its Q1 report on May 05, 2023 with positive results, but no significant factors particularly remarkable relative to its peers. This typically translates into the stock performing on par with market performance for the upcoming quarter. Therefore, Align received an overall score of 75, translating into a HOLD ranking. balance sheet Align appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Align reported solid equity numbers this period. At filing, equity was reported as 3.5B, representing -3.00% change from the previous period. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 9.65%. These equity changes appear exceptionally balanced and impressive objectively compared to their peers. Therefore, its equity movement component earned a score of 83. Also, Align is doing a good job of keeping its liabilities under control and growing intelligently. At filing, their liabilities were 2.4B, representing 3.00% change from the previous period. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing liabilities, especially relative to their peers. These results statistically lead to positive movement in stock prices, so we rated its liabilities movement component 72. That said, one metric, Cash & Equivalents, stood out as particularly concerning. Align reported concerning cash and cash equivalents metrics in this filing. Specifically, they reported that cash and cash equivalents were 832.4M, representing a -12.00% change from the last period. The company's cash and cash equivalents metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Its cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 56. Consequently, the company's balance sheet earned a rank of 73. income statement Align appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Align reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 15.78%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 83. Also, Align's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 8.8, representing a change of -12.00%. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. The company's return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 73. On the other hand, EBITDA, jumped out as looking problematic. Align reported concerning EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 788.2M, representing -6.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 30.38% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their EBITDA metrics are even more problematic when compared to their peers. Therefore, their EBITDA component earned a score of 60. As the companie's management is doing an excellent job managing the critical metrics, the income statement was given a score of 68. cash flow Align appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Free cash flow numbers published by Align were 6.0, which was a 71.00% change from the previous filing. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 0.97%. The company's free cash flow metrics are especially strong compared to its peers. Management seems to balance cash flow management, asset growth, and resource allocations in general. Consequently, their free cash flow movement received a grade of 93. Also, Align's strong net cash flow numbers, which were -94.2M in this filing, showed a 40.00% change from the last period. Their net cash flow metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. Consequently, their net cash flow movement received a grade of 83. At the same time, one critical cash flow metric, Asset Turnover, was notably weak. Align's asset turnover numbers were discouraging, reflecting significant concerns related to management's ability to leverage assets to generate sales effectively and efficiently. Align recorded asset turnover of 0.6, which represents a -0.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 2.11%. The company's asset turnover metrics seem especially problematic relative to their peers. Underwhelming results in asset turnover metrics often lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated its asset turnover momentum 69. Because the company's management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash flow was given a score of 87. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Align's stock is now priced above its 5-day and 200-day, but below its 50-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Align's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 52.
24,766	fundamental summary Looking at American Tower's financials of Q1 reflected decent results. The company's growth, value, and income factors all individually appear negative and will put significant pressure on the likelihood of continued positive performance. We therefore gave American Tower a total score of 67 out of 100 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Overall, American Tower's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. American Tower has done an excellent job managing its liabilities. American Tower's liabilities stood at 54.6B in the current filing, which represents a -0.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all interesting relative to their peers and suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect a higher intrinsic value. These results statistically lead to positive movement in stock prices, so we rated its liabilities movement component 75. Also, American Tower reported solid equity numbers this period. At filing, equity was reported as 5.4B, representing -3.00% change from the previous period. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 9.70%. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. Therefore, its equity movement component earned a score of 70. That said, one metric, Book Value Factors, stood out as particularly concerning. American Tower publishes discouraging results related to book value factors in this report. As of the current filing, price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 17.0, representing a -5.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 17.42%. They does not yet appear to be headed in the right direction to achieve strong book value metrics. Therefore, their book value factors earned a score of 56. Similarly, because their management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 66. income statement Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the income statement's strength in American Tower's recent report: Return Factors and Revenue Efficiency. Return factors metrics and ratios were exceptional in this report. American Tower reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 12.2, representing a change of -23.00% from the last report. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. The company's return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 82. Also, American Tower did an excellent job managing its revenue efficiency this past period. American Tower's revenue efficiency is 10.8B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 1.00% change from the previous report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.87%. Their impressive revenue efficiency is even more impressive relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 61. On the other hand, EBITDA, jumped out as looking problematic. American Tower reported concerning EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 8.2B, representing 2.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 5.72% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. The company's EBITDA metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Discouraging results like these statistically lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated their EBITDA a grade of 54. Its income statement, therefore, earned a score of 66. cash flow American Tower appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. American Tower did a great job related to free cash flow this period, which stood at 8.8, representing a 10.00% change from the previous filing. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 8.48%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Therefore, its free cash flow movement earned a score of 82. Also, American Tower's strong net cash flow numbers, which were -346.0M in this filing, showed a -71.00% change from the last period. This industry-leading net cash flow momentum should reinforce broader positive momentum for its's stock price going forward. Hence, its net cash flow earned a score of 64. On the other hand, Asset Turnover, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. American Tower's asset turnover metrics were concerning and highlighted potential issues management is having effectively turning assets into sales efficiently. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.2, representing a 1.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 8.43% percent by this parameter. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly less impressive when compared to their peers and competitors. Therefore, their asset turnover movement earned a score of 61. Because the company's management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash flow was given a score of 67. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. American Tower's stock is now priced above its 5-day, but below its 50-day and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near-term. The company is trading near it's 12-month low, which signals it struggle to keep above it support price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), American Tower's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 42.
24,809	fundamental summary At a high level, the metrics from AmerisourceBergen's Q1 financial report release provided many positive indicators. Their positive income and value factors indicate that it is likely to continue to produce impressive results for the foreseeable future, as well. This relative strength should allow AmerisourceBergen to continue to perform well even in a tough market. We gave AmerisourceBergen a 79 rating and a BUY recommendation. balance sheet AmerisourceBergen appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. AmerisourceBergen's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 121.8 and represents 165.00% change from the previous report. These book value factor numbers show that management has been prudent in focusing on efficient growth. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its book value factors earned a score of 99. Also, AmerisourceBergen has done an excellent job managing its liabilities. AmerisourceBergen's liabilities stood at 58.3B in the current filing, which represents a 1.00% change from the previous report. These liabilities changes appear balanced compared to their peers and project the message that management is capable and focused on balancing asset growth, resource allocation, and growing liabilities. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 71. That said, one metric, Cash & Equivalents, stood out as strongly negative. AmerisourceBergen did a poor job related to managing cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 1.5B, representing a -9.00% change from the previous filing. This performance is significantly less impressive than its peers and competitors. Its cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 59. Therefore, it received a score of 80. income statement AmerisourceBergen seems to be balancing strong EBITDA and Revenue Efficiency along with an overall impressive positive income statement. AmerisourceBergen's management did a remarkable job this period managing its EBITDA. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 3.7B, which represents a -1.00% change from the last period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 30.38%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its EBITDA component earned a score of 69. Also, AmerisourceBergen reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 15.78%. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', should support a positive movement in the company's stock price. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 64. That said, one metric, Return Factors, stood out as strongly negative. In this filing, AmerisourceBergen reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 221.0, which represents a growth of -56.00%. This metric might have a 3.26% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. These numbers show that management has been unsuccessful in fostering appropriate growth related to return on assets and return on equity momentum relative to their peers. Its return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 63. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the income statement was given a score of 67. cash flow AmerisourceBergen appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. AmerisourceBergen's management was effective in improving their net cash flow, which now sits at -1.8B and represents a -1.00% change from the previous report. The company is headed in the right direction regarding business priorities, exhibiting prudent net cash flow management and growth. The company's net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 84. Also, Free cash flow numbers published by AmerisourceBergen were 11.9, which was a 20.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 0.97%. These free cash flow numbers show that management has executed well while generating cash flow and encouraging growth. The company's free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 83. That said, one metric, Capital Expenditure, stood out as particularly concerning. AmerisourceBergen's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were discouraging and reflected management's unbalanced growth strategy. AmerisourceBergen recorded CapEx of -459.3M, which represents a 6.00% change from the previous report. They appears to be headed in the wrong direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Its CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 77. Because the company's management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash flow was given a score of 88. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. AmerisourceBergen's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), AmerisourceBergen's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 83.
24,816	fundamental summary Amgen's financial results from Q1 demonstrated decent performance, but will likely only help Amgen remain on par with its peers. The company's growth and value factors appear positive and give support for optimism regarding the likelihood of continued positive performance. Overall, Amgen's value and growth factors are trending positively, and we, therefore, give Amgen an overall grade of 66 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Amgen's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Amgen reported a positive trendline in their cash and cash equivalents metrics. Specifically, they reported that cash and cash equivalents were 31.6B, representing 314.00% change from the last report. Its impressive cash and cash equivalents metrics should support upward pressure on its's stock price. The company's cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 98. Also, The company's assets section could set high expectations for Amgen's future attractiveness, as they went to 88.7B, which is a 36.00% change from the last period. These results, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. Consequently, their asset movement received a grade of 78. That said, one metric, Liabilities, stood out as particularly concerning. Amgen's liabilities stood at 83.4B in the current filing, which represents a 36.00% change from the previous report. This performance is relatively weak in comparison to their peers and suggests that its's stock price will likely suffer until this is solved. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 46. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 80. income statement Amgen appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. In this filing, Amgen reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 252.8, which represents a change of 100.00%. The company appears headed in the right direction in terms of these return factors, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 91. Also, Amgen's financials reveal an interesting trend for their revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 15.78%. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', should support a positive movement in the company's stock price. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 82. However, one discouraging result, EBITDA, stood out. Amgen reported concerning EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 13.3B, representing -3.00% change from the previous period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 30.38%. Amgen appears to be headed in the wrong direction in terms of EBITDA momentum, likely due to insufficient capital controls and a weaker than expected overall financial performance. Its EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 63. Its income statement, therefore, earned a score of 73. cash flow Amgen's cash flow factors had several troubling metrics this period. Amgen's asset turnover numbers were discouraging, reflecting significant concerns related to management's ability to leverage assets to generate sales effectively and efficiently. Amgen recorded asset turnover of 0.3, which represents a -15.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 2.11%. The company's asset turnover metrics seem especially problematic relative to their peers. Underwhelming results in asset turnover metrics often lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated its asset turnover momentum 40. Also, Amgen's net cash flow metrics were 25.0B according to their current filing, which represents a 7053.00% change from the previous report. Amgen's net cash flow metrics are especially disappointing relative to their peers. Consequently, their net cash flow movement received a grade of 47. That said, one metric, Free Cash flow, stood out as strongly positive. Free cash flow numbers published by Amgen were 14.1, which was a -14.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 0.97%. These free cash flow numbers show that management has executed well while generating cash flow and encouraging growth. The company's free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 52. Therefore, it received a cautionary score of 47. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Amgen's stock is now priced above its 5-day, but below its 50-day and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near-term. The company is trading near it's 12-month low, which signals it struggle to keep above it support price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Amgen's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 42.
24,816	fundamental summary Amgen's financial results from Q1 demonstrated decent performance, but will likely only help Amgen remain on par with its peers. The company's growth and value factors appear positive and give support for optimism regarding the likelihood of continued positive performance. Overall, Amgen's value and growth factors are trending positively, and we, therefore, give Amgen an overall grade of 66 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Amgen's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Amgen reported a positive trendline in their cash and cash equivalents metrics. Specifically, they reported that cash and cash equivalents were 31.6B, representing 314.00% change from the last report. Its impressive cash and cash equivalents metrics should support upward pressure on its's stock price. The company's cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 98. Also, The company's assets section could set high expectations for Amgen's future attractiveness, as they went to 88.7B, which is a 36.00% change from the last period. These results, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. Consequently, their asset movement received a grade of 78. That said, one metric, Liabilities, stood out as particularly concerning. Amgen's liabilities stood at 83.4B in the current filing, which represents a 36.00% change from the previous report. This performance is relatively weak in comparison to their peers and suggests that its's stock price will likely suffer until this is solved. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 46. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 80. income statement Amgen appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. In this filing, Amgen reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 252.8, which represents a change of 100.00%. The company appears headed in the right direction in terms of these return factors, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 91. Also, Amgen's financials reveal an interesting trend for their revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 15.78%. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', should support a positive movement in the company's stock price. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 82. However, one discouraging result, EBITDA, stood out. Amgen reported concerning EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 13.3B, representing -3.00% change from the previous period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 30.38%. Amgen appears to be headed in the wrong direction in terms of EBITDA momentum, likely due to insufficient capital controls and a weaker than expected overall financial performance. Its EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 63. Its income statement, therefore, earned a score of 73. cash flow Amgen's cash flow factors had several troubling metrics this period. Amgen's asset turnover numbers were discouraging, reflecting significant concerns related to management's ability to leverage assets to generate sales effectively and efficiently. Amgen recorded asset turnover of 0.3, which represents a -15.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 2.11%. The company's asset turnover metrics seem especially problematic relative to their peers. Underwhelming results in asset turnover metrics often lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated its asset turnover momentum 40. Also, Amgen's net cash flow metrics were 25.0B according to their current filing, which represents a 7053.00% change from the previous report. Amgen's net cash flow metrics are especially disappointing relative to their peers. Consequently, their net cash flow movement received a grade of 47. That said, one metric, Free Cash flow, stood out as strongly positive. Free cash flow numbers published by Amgen were 14.1, which was a -14.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 0.97%. These free cash flow numbers show that management has executed well while generating cash flow and encouraging growth. The company's free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 52. Therefore, it received a cautionary score of 47. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Amgen's stock is now priced above its 5-day, but below its 50-day and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near-term. The company is trading near it's 12-month low, which signals it struggle to keep above it support price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Amgen's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 42.
24,827	fundamental summary Amphenol's financial results from Q1 demonstrated decent performance, but will likely only help Amphenol remain on par with its peers. Its growth, value, and income factors all individually appear positive and give support for optimism regarding the likelihood of continued positive performance. Therefore, Amphenol received an overall score of 77, translating into a HOLD ranking. balance sheet Amphenol appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Amphenol reported solid equity numbers this period. At filing, equity was reported as 7.3B, representing 4.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 5.93% percent by this parameter. These metrics are all the more impressive relative to their peers and should support an upswing in their stock price. The company's equity movement component, therefore, received a grade of 76. Also, Amphenol did a great job related to cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 1.4B, representing a 1.00% change from the previous filing. Its impressive cash and cash equivalents metrics should support upward pressure on its's stock price. Consequently, their cash and cash equivalents movement received a grade of 70. However, one discouraging result, Liabilities, stood out. Amphenol's liabilities stood at 8.0B in the current filing, which represents a -3.00% change from the previous report. These liabilities metrics show that management has been unsuccessful in encouraging healthy growth while managing liabilities. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 61. Therefore, we scored the company's balance sheet a 71. income statement Amphenol appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics, especially EBITDA and Revenue Efficiency. Amphenol's management did a remarkable job this period managing its EBITDA. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 3.1B, which represents a 0.00% change from the last period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 14.29%. Its EBITDA metrics highlight an impressive overall financial performance, which is expected to continue moving forward. Therefore, its EBITDA component earned a score of 73. Also, Amphenol's financials reveal an interesting trend for their revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 19.93%. Their impressive revenue efficiency is even more impressive relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 70. However, one discouraging result, Return Factors, stood out. Return factors metrics and ratios were disappointing in this report. Amphenol reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 27.8, representing a change of -2.00% from the last report.change of -2.00% from the previous period. This metric might have a 2.58% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. The company's return factor metrics return on equity and return on assets are even more concerning when compared to their peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 69. their income statement received an overall score of 72. cash flow Two main cash flow metrics, Net Cash Flow and Asset Turnover, are driving the positive outlook for Amphenol's financial strength. Amphenol presents exciting net cash flow numbers for its recent financial release, illustrated by a net cash flow of 143.6M, which is a change of -18.00% from the last filing. This industry-leading net cash flow momentum should reinforce broader positive momentum for its's stock price going forward. Hence, its net cash flow earned a score of 75. Also, Amphenol is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.8, representing a -1.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 20.80% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their impressive asset turnover metrics, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support a tailwind in the company's stock price. Therefore, its asset turnover movement earned a score of 71. At the same time, one critical cash flow metric, Capital Expenditure, was notably weak. Amphenol's management did not a remarkable job this period managing capital expenditures (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -398.8M, which represents a -5.00% change from the last period. This performance is all the more uninspiring relative to their peers and competitors. Its CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 57. Therefore, we scored the company's cash flow a 71. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Amphenol's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Amphenol's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 78.
24,893	fundamental summary ANSYS published its Q1 report on May 03, 2023 with positive results, but no significant factors particularly remarkable relative to its peers. It is highly likely that the company will be mostly tethered to market performance and sector movements for the near term. We therefore gave ANSYS a total score of 74 out of 100 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet A few key balance sheet metrics in this report were discouraging. ANSYS did a poor job related to managing cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 507.7M, representing a -17.00% change from the previous filing. Their anemic growth in cash and cash equivalents, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should hurt their stock price. Its cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 50. Also, ANSYS's liabilities stood at 1.7B in the current filing, which represents a -7.00% change from the previous report. These liabilities metrics show that management has been unsuccessful in encouraging healthy growth while managing liabilities. Discouraging results like these statistically lead to negative movement in stock prices, so we rated their liabilities movement component 51. At the same time, one balance sheet metric, Assets, was actually strongly positive. The company's assets section could set high expectations for ANSYS's future attractiveness, as they went to 6.5B, which is a -3.00% change from the last period. This growth should support upward pressure on its's stock price, which better captures their intrinsic value. The company's asset component, therefore, received a grade of 69. Consequently, their balance sheet earned a rank of 59. income statement ANSYS appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Return factors metrics and ratios were exceptional in this report. ANSYS reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 12.1, representing a change of 8.00% from the last report. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 88. Also, ANSYS's management did a remarkable job this period managing its EBITDA. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 771.7M, which represents a 7.00% change from the last period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 14.29%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 84. On the other hand, Revenue Efficiency, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. ANSYS reported discouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. As of the current filing, they were reported as 2.1B and represented 4.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 19.93% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', isn't encouraging. As a result, their revenue efficiency earned a score of 53. Therefore, their income statement earned a grade of 68. cash flow Overall, ANSYS's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. ANSYS is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.3, representing a 8.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 20.80%. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly more impressive when contrasted against their peers and competitors. Therefore, its asset turnover movement earned a score of 88. Also, ANSYS presents exciting net cash flow numbers for its recent financial release, illustrated by a net cash flow of -149.7M, which is a change of -181.00% from the last filing. Their net cash flow metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. Hence, its net cash flow earned a score of 75. At the same time, one critical cash flow metric, Capital Expenditure, was notably weak. ANSYS's management did not a remarkable job this period managing capital expenditures (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -26.2M, which represents a -8.00% change from the last period. The company's disappointing CapEx growth is expected to stunt the momentum they hoped for this period. Consequently, their CapEx movement received a grade of 55. Therefore, we scored the company's cash flow a 80. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. ANSYS's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), ANSYS's stock appears overbought. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 62.
24,893	fundamental summary ANSYS published its Q1 report on May 03, 2023 with positive results, but no significant factors particularly remarkable relative to its peers. It is highly likely that the company will be mostly tethered to market performance and sector movements for the near term. We therefore gave ANSYS a total score of 74 out of 100 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet A few key balance sheet metrics in this report were discouraging. ANSYS did a poor job related to managing cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 507.7M, representing a -17.00% change from the previous filing. Their anemic growth in cash and cash equivalents, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should hurt their stock price. Its cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 50. Also, ANSYS's liabilities stood at 1.7B in the current filing, which represents a -7.00% change from the previous report. These liabilities metrics show that management has been unsuccessful in encouraging healthy growth while managing liabilities. Discouraging results like these statistically lead to negative movement in stock prices, so we rated their liabilities movement component 51. At the same time, one balance sheet metric, Assets, was actually strongly positive. The company's assets section could set high expectations for ANSYS's future attractiveness, as they went to 6.5B, which is a -3.00% change from the last period. This growth should support upward pressure on its's stock price, which better captures their intrinsic value. The company's asset component, therefore, received a grade of 69. Consequently, their balance sheet earned a rank of 59. income statement ANSYS appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Return factors metrics and ratios were exceptional in this report. ANSYS reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 12.1, representing a change of 8.00% from the last report. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 88. Also, ANSYS's management did a remarkable job this period managing its EBITDA. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 771.7M, which represents a 7.00% change from the last period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 14.29%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 84. On the other hand, Revenue Efficiency, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. ANSYS reported discouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. As of the current filing, they were reported as 2.1B and represented 4.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 19.93% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', isn't encouraging. As a result, their revenue efficiency earned a score of 53. Therefore, their income statement earned a grade of 68. cash flow Overall, ANSYS's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. ANSYS is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.3, representing a 8.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 20.80%. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly more impressive when contrasted against their peers and competitors. Therefore, its asset turnover movement earned a score of 88. Also, ANSYS presents exciting net cash flow numbers for its recent financial release, illustrated by a net cash flow of -149.7M, which is a change of -181.00% from the last filing. Their net cash flow metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. Hence, its net cash flow earned a score of 75. At the same time, one critical cash flow metric, Capital Expenditure, was notably weak. ANSYS's management did not a remarkable job this period managing capital expenditures (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -26.2M, which represents a -8.00% change from the last period. The company's disappointing CapEx growth is expected to stunt the momentum they hoped for this period. Consequently, their CapEx movement received a grade of 55. Therefore, we scored the company's cash flow a 80. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. ANSYS's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), ANSYS's stock appears overbought. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 62.
24,937	fundamental summary Apple Inc. released impressive Q1 results on May 05, 2023. Their positive income, growth, and value factors indicate that it is likely to continue to produce impressive results for the foreseeable future, as well. We expect that this positive performance will continue in the coming months, and anticipate that Apple Inc. will maintain good momentum even in a challenging environment. We gave Apple Inc. a 90 rating and a S.BUY recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Apple Inc.'s critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Apple did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 62.2B, representing a 10.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 5.93%. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. The company's equity movement component, therefore, received a grade of 96. Also, Apple's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 44.0 and represents 26.00% change from the previous report. These book value factor numbers show that management has been prudent in focusing on efficient growth. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. The company's book value factors component, therefore, received a grade of 89. At the same time, one critical balance sheet metric, Liabilities, was notably weak. Apple's liabilities stood at 270.0B in the current filing, which represents a -7.00% change from the previous report. These liabilities metrics show that management has been unsuccessful in encouraging healthy growth while managing liabilities. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 52. Similarly, because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 84. income statement Apple Inc. appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Return factors metrics and ratios were exceptional in this report. Apple reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 145.6, representing a change of -2.00% from the last report. The company appears headed in the right direction in terms of these return factors, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 80. Also, Apple reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 19.93%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. As a result, its revenue efficiency earned a score of 74. On the other hand, EBITDA, jumped out as looking problematic. Apple's EBIDTA now sits at 140.6B and represents -1.00% change from the last reporting period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 14.29%. The company's EBITDA metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Its EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 68. Its income statement, therefore, earned a score of 73. cash flow Overall, Apple Inc.'s critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Apple is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 1.1, representing a 6.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 20.80%. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly more impressive when contrasted against their peers and competitors. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 84. Also, Apple's management was effective in improving their net cash flow, which now sits at -2.1B and represents a 88.00% change from the previous report. Their net cash flow metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. Hence, its net cash flow earned a score of 66. On the other hand, Capital Expenditure, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Apple's management was ineffective in materially improving CapEx, which now sits at -12.1B and represents a -3.00% change from the previous report. They appears to be headed in the wrong direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Its CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 60. Its cash flow received an overall score of 75. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Apple's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Apple's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 78.
24,937	fundamental summary Apple Inc. released impressive Q1 results on May 05, 2023. Their positive income, growth, and value factors indicate that it is likely to continue to produce impressive results for the foreseeable future, as well. We expect that this positive performance will continue in the coming months, and anticipate that Apple Inc. will maintain good momentum even in a challenging environment. We gave Apple Inc. a 90 rating and a S.BUY recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Apple Inc.'s critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Apple did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 62.2B, representing a 10.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 5.93%. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. The company's equity movement component, therefore, received a grade of 96. Also, Apple's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 44.0 and represents 26.00% change from the previous report. These book value factor numbers show that management has been prudent in focusing on efficient growth. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. The company's book value factors component, therefore, received a grade of 89. At the same time, one critical balance sheet metric, Liabilities, was notably weak. Apple's liabilities stood at 270.0B in the current filing, which represents a -7.00% change from the previous report. These liabilities metrics show that management has been unsuccessful in encouraging healthy growth while managing liabilities. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 52. Similarly, because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 84. income statement Apple Inc. appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Return factors metrics and ratios were exceptional in this report. Apple reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 145.6, representing a change of -2.00% from the last report. The company appears headed in the right direction in terms of these return factors, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 80. Also, Apple reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 19.93%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. As a result, its revenue efficiency earned a score of 74. On the other hand, EBITDA, jumped out as looking problematic. Apple's EBIDTA now sits at 140.6B and represents -1.00% change from the last reporting period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 14.29%. The company's EBITDA metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Its EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 68. Its income statement, therefore, earned a score of 73. cash flow Overall, Apple Inc.'s critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Apple is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 1.1, representing a 6.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 20.80%. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly more impressive when contrasted against their peers and competitors. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 84. Also, Apple's management was effective in improving their net cash flow, which now sits at -2.1B and represents a 88.00% change from the previous report. Their net cash flow metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. Hence, its net cash flow earned a score of 66. On the other hand, Capital Expenditure, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Apple's management was ineffective in materially improving CapEx, which now sits at -12.1B and represents a -3.00% change from the previous report. They appears to be headed in the wrong direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Its CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 60. Its cash flow received an overall score of 75. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Apple's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Apple's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 78.
25,307	fundamental summary AutoZone's financial results from Q1 demonstrated decent performance, but will likely only help AutoZone remain on par with its peers. This typically translates into the stock performing on par with market performance for the upcoming quarter. Therefore, they earned a total score of 66 out of 100 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet AutoZone appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. AutoZone reported a positive trendline in their cash and cash equivalents metrics. Specifically, they reported that cash and cash equivalents were 301.3M, representing 12.00% change from the last report. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. It suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect its actual intrinsic value. Therefore, its cash and cash equivalents movement earned a score of 82. Also, AutoZone has done an excellent job managing its liabilities. AutoZone's liabilities stood at 19.7B in the current filing, which represents a 3.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all interesting relative to their peers and suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect a higher intrinsic value. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 74. However, one concerning metric, Book Value Factors, stood out. AutoZone's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as -11.2 and represents 8.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 13.41%. Their book value factor metrics are even more concerning when compared to their peers. Disappointing results in book value factors typically precede negative pressure in stock prices, so its book value factors received a grade of 56. The company's balance sheet, Therefore, earned a score of 64. income statement Overall, AutoZone's critical income statement metrics appear to strongly support positive growth going forward. AutoZone's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was -66.1, representing a change of 18.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. The company's return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 72. Also, AutoZone's management was effective in improving its EBIDTA, which now sits at 4.2B and represents a 2.00% change from the last reporting period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 18.90%. The company is headed in the right direction regarding EBITDA, exhibiting efficient capital controls and strong overall financial performance. Consequently, their EBITDA movement received a grade of 71. On the other hand, Revenue Efficiency, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. AutoZone's revenue efficiency metrics look especially concerning this period, highlighting issues management is having controlling and reducing expenses while increasing earnings. This metric might have a 19.36% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', isn't encouraging. Its revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 66. Therefore, we scored its income statement a 69. cash flow Net Cash Flow and Free Cash flow stand out as the most significant drivers of AutoZone's cash flow's strength. AutoZone's management was effective in improving their net cash flow, which now sits at 61.9M and represents a 109.00% change from the previous report. Their net cash flow metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. Hence, its net cash flow earned a score of 66. Also, AutoZone did a great job related to free cash flow this period, which stood at 130.3, representing a 0.00% change from the previous filing. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.71%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Therefore, its free cash flow movement earned a score of 64. That said, one metric, Capital Expenditure, stood out as particularly concerning. AutoZone's management did not a remarkable job this period managing capital expenditures (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -679.9M, which represents a -8.00% change from the last period. They appears to be headed in the wrong direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Its CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 57. Their cash flow received an overall score of 62. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. AutoZone's stock is now priced above its 5-day, but below its 50-day and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), AutoZone's stock appears overbought. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 47.
25,708	fundamental summary BorgWarner's recently released results from Q1 indicate that BorgWarner is performing reasonably well and on par with its peers. The company's growth, value, and income factors all individually appear negative and will put significant pressure on the likelihood of continued positive performance. We gave BorgWarner a 61 rating and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the balance sheet strength in BorgWarner's recent report: Book Value Factors and Equity. BorgWarner's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 1.4 and represents 7.00% change from the previous report. Their industry-leading book value factors momentum reinforces an expectation for future positive momentum for their stock price going forward. Therefore, its book value factors earned a score of 79. Also, BorgWarner reported solid equity numbers this period. At filing, equity was reported as 7.4B, representing 3.00% change from the previous period. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.17%. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. Therefore, its equity movement component earned a score of 70. That said, one metric, Cash & Equivalents, stood out as particularly concerning. BorgWarner did a poor job related to managing cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 950.0M, representing a -29.00% change from the previous filing. This performance is significantly less impressive than its peers and competitors. Discouraging results like these statistically lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated their cash and cash equivalents with a score of 45. Consequently, their balance sheet earned a rank of 66. income statement BorgWarner appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics, especially EBITDA and Revenue Efficiency. BorgWarner's management was effective in improving its EBIDTA, which now sits at 2.3B and represents a -0.00% change from the last reporting period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 18.90%. The company is headed in the right direction regarding EBITDA, exhibiting efficient capital controls and strong overall financial performance. Therefore, its EBITDA component earned a score of 66. Also, BorgWarner did an excellent job managing its revenue efficiency this past period. BorgWarner's revenue efficiency is 16.1B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 2.00% change from the previous report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 19.36%. Their impressive revenue efficiency is even more impressive relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. As a result, its revenue efficiency earned a score of 66. On the other hand, Return Factors, jumped out as looking problematic. BorgWarner's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 13.7, representing a change of -1.00%. This metric might have a 7.62% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. The company's return factor metrics return on equity and return on assets are even more concerning when compared to their peers. Its return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 64. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the income statement was given a score of 65. cash flow BorgWarner's most recent cash flow report has several troubling numbers, specifically Free Cash flow and Capital Expenditure. BorgWarner's published free cash flow numbers were subpar and could mean that management has lost focus on achieving healthy growth. BorgWarner recorded free cash flow of 2.6, which represents -27.00% growth from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 2.71% percent by this parameter. Their free cash flow situation is more concerning relative to their peers and competitors. Its free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 48. Also, BorgWarner's management was ineffective in materially improving CapEx, which now sits at -812.0M and represents a -16.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more uninspiring relative to their peers and competitors. Its CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 49. That said, one metric, Asset Turnover, stood out as strongly positive. BorgWarner's published asset turnover numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. BorgWarner recorded asset turnover of 0.9, which represents a 1.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 1.59%. Its asset turnover metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 64. Therefore, the company's cash flow earned a grade of 51. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. BorgWarner's stock is now priced above its 200-day, but below its 5-day and 50-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the long-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), BorgWarner's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal negative momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 57.
25,798	fundamental summary Looking at Bristol-Myers Squibb's financials of Q1 reflected decent results. This typically translates into the stock performing on par with market performance for the upcoming quarter. Bottom line, Bristol-Myers Squibb's financials indicate solid performance in terms of value and growth, which leads us to believe that they may become interesting again in the next few months. But for right now, we gave the company an overall grade of 67 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Bristol-Myers Squibb's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. The company's assets section could set high expectations for Bristol-Myers Squibb's future attractiveness, as they went to 94.3B, which is a -3.00% change from the last period. This performance is interesting in comparison to its peers and competitors. Consequently, their asset movement received a grade of 75. Also, Bristol-Myers Squibb's management was effective in improving its cash and cash equivalents metrics, which now sit at 9.0B. This represents -1.00% change from the last reporting period. This impressive growth, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. Therefore, its cash and cash equivalents movement earned a score of 69. On the other hand, Liabilities, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. In terms of liabilities, Bristol-Myers Squibb published uninspiring results. Their reported liabilities were 62.4B, representing a -5.00% change from the previous report. These liabilities metrics show that management has been unsuccessful in encouraging healthy growth while managing liabilities. Discouraging results like these statistically lead to negative movement in stock prices, so we rated their liabilities movement component 65. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 74. income statement Bristol-Myers Squibb appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Bristol-Myers Squibb's financials reveal an interesting trend for their revenue efficiency. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 15.78%. Their impressive revenue efficiency is even more impressive relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 83. Also, In this filing, Bristol-Myers Squibb reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 23.1, which represents a change of 22.00%. The company appears headed in the right direction in terms of these return factors, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 68. That said, one metric, EBITDA, stood out as strongly negative. Bristol-Myers Squibb's management didn't make significant improvements to their EBITDA this period. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 19.9B, which represents a -3.00% change from the last period. This metric might have a 30.38% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Bristol-Myers Squibb appears to be headed in the wrong direction in terms of EBITDA momentum, likely due to insufficient capital controls and a weaker than expected overall financial performance. Its EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 63. Consequently, their income statement earned a rank of 69. cash flow Overall, Bristol-Myers Squibb's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Bristol-Myers Squibb's published asset turnover numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. Bristol-Myers Squibb recorded asset turnover of 0.5, which represents a 4.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 2.11% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their impressive asset turnover metrics, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support a tailwind in the company's stock price. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 73. Also, Bristol-Myers Squibb's management did a great job this period managing its capital expenditure (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -1.1B, which represents a -2.00% change from the last period. This performance is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. The company's CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 62. That said, one metric, Free Cash flow, stood out as strongly negative. Bristol-Myers Squibb did a poor job related to generating and maintaining strong free cash flow this period, which stood at 5.1, representing a -9.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 0.97% percent by this parameter. their free cash flow situation appears to be much weaker than their peers. Management needs to do a better job balancing cash flow, asset growth, and resources allocations in general. Disappointing results in free cash flow often lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated their free cash flow with a score of 56. Consequently, the company's cash flow earned a score of 64. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock is now priced below its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a negative setup in the near, medium, and long-term. The company is trading near it's 12-month low, which signals it struggle to keep above it support price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Bristol-Myers Squibb's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 37.
25,941	fundamental summary Looking at Cadence Design Systems's financials of Q1 reflected decent results. This typically translates into the stock performing on par with market performance for the upcoming quarter. Overall, Cadence Design Systems's income and value factors are trending positively, and we, therefore, give Cadence Design Systems an overall grade of 73 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Cadence Design Systems's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Cadence Design Systems did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 2.9B, representing a 7.00% change. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 5.93% percent by this parameter. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. Therefore, its equity movement component earned a score of 93. Also, Cadence Design Systems publishes solid book value factor metrics in this report. Price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 18.9 and represents a 19.00% change from the previous report. Their industry-leading book value factors momentum reinforces an expectation for future positive momentum for their stock price going forward. The company's book value factors component, therefore, received a grade of 85. That said, one metric, Liabilities, stood out as particularly concerning. In terms of liabilities, Cadence Design Systems published uninspiring results. Their reported liabilities were 2.2B, representing a -7.00% change from the previous report. This performance is relatively weak in comparison to their peers and suggests that its's stock price will likely suffer until this is solved. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 53. The company's balance sheet received an overall score of 79. income statement Cadence Design Systems appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Cadence Design Systems's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 30.0, representing a change of -3.00%. The company appears headed in the right direction in terms of these return factors, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. The company's return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 69. Also, Cadence Design Systems's management did a remarkable job this period managing its EBITDA. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 1.2B, which represents a -4.00% change from the last period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 14.29%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Consequently, their EBITDA movement received a grade of 64. At the same time, one critical income statement metric, Revenue Efficiency, was notably weak. Cadence Design Systems's revenue efficiency metrics look especially concerning this period, highlighting issues management is having controlling and reducing expenses while increasing earnings. This metric might have a 19.93% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Its uninspiring revenue efficiency is even more concerning relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 56. Therefore, their income statement earned a grade of 60. cash flow Cadence Design Systems appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Cadence Design Systems's published asset turnover numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. Cadence Design Systems recorded asset turnover of 0.8, which represents a 3.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 20.80%. Its asset turnover metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. The company's asset turnover movement, therefore, received a grade of 84. Also, Cadence Design Systems presents exciting net cash flow numbers for its recent financial release, illustrated by a net cash flow of -217.8M, which is a change of -5.00% from the last filing. This industry-leading net cash flow momentum should reinforce broader positive momentum for its's stock price going forward. Hence, its net cash flow earned a score of 57. That said, one metric, Capital Expenditure, stood out as particularly concerning. Cadence Design Systems's management was ineffective in materially improving CapEx, which now sits at -131.8M and represents a -7.00% change from the previous report. They appears to be headed in the wrong direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Consequently, their CapEx movement received a grade of 56. Consequently, their cash flow earned a score of 71. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Cadence Design Systems's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Cadence Design Systems's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 73.
25,941	fundamental summary Looking at Cadence Design Systems's financials of Q1 reflected decent results. This typically translates into the stock performing on par with market performance for the upcoming quarter. Overall, Cadence Design Systems's income and value factors are trending positively, and we, therefore, give Cadence Design Systems an overall grade of 73 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Cadence Design Systems's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Cadence Design Systems did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 2.9B, representing a 7.00% change. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 5.93% percent by this parameter. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. Therefore, its equity movement component earned a score of 93. Also, Cadence Design Systems publishes solid book value factor metrics in this report. Price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 18.9 and represents a 19.00% change from the previous report. Their industry-leading book value factors momentum reinforces an expectation for future positive momentum for their stock price going forward. The company's book value factors component, therefore, received a grade of 85. That said, one metric, Liabilities, stood out as particularly concerning. In terms of liabilities, Cadence Design Systems published uninspiring results. Their reported liabilities were 2.2B, representing a -7.00% change from the previous report. This performance is relatively weak in comparison to their peers and suggests that its's stock price will likely suffer until this is solved. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 53. The company's balance sheet received an overall score of 79. income statement Cadence Design Systems appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Cadence Design Systems's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 30.0, representing a change of -3.00%. The company appears headed in the right direction in terms of these return factors, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. The company's return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 69. Also, Cadence Design Systems's management did a remarkable job this period managing its EBITDA. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 1.2B, which represents a -4.00% change from the last period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 14.29%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Consequently, their EBITDA movement received a grade of 64. At the same time, one critical income statement metric, Revenue Efficiency, was notably weak. Cadence Design Systems's revenue efficiency metrics look especially concerning this period, highlighting issues management is having controlling and reducing expenses while increasing earnings. This metric might have a 19.93% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Its uninspiring revenue efficiency is even more concerning relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 56. Therefore, their income statement earned a grade of 60. cash flow Cadence Design Systems appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Cadence Design Systems's published asset turnover numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. Cadence Design Systems recorded asset turnover of 0.8, which represents a 3.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 20.80%. Its asset turnover metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. The company's asset turnover movement, therefore, received a grade of 84. Also, Cadence Design Systems presents exciting net cash flow numbers for its recent financial release, illustrated by a net cash flow of -217.8M, which is a change of -5.00% from the last filing. This industry-leading net cash flow momentum should reinforce broader positive momentum for its's stock price going forward. Hence, its net cash flow earned a score of 57. That said, one metric, Capital Expenditure, stood out as particularly concerning. Cadence Design Systems's management was ineffective in materially improving CapEx, which now sits at -131.8M and represents a -7.00% change from the previous report. They appears to be headed in the wrong direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Consequently, their CapEx movement received a grade of 56. Consequently, their cash flow earned a score of 71. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Cadence Design Systems's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Cadence Design Systems's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 73.
26,273	fundamental summary Centene released impressive Q1 results on Apr 25, 2023. Specifically, their growth, value, and income factors indicate a well-planned and balanced effort, which is generating exciting growth. There should be significant upside potential for the stock looking forward. As such, Centene received an overall score of 88 and a S.BUY recommendation. balance sheet Centene appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Centene did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 25.0B, representing a 4.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 9.65%. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 94. Also, Centene did a great job related to cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 15.9B, representing a 31.00% change from the previous filing. This impressive growth, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. Consequently, their cash and cash equivalents movement received a grade of 89. On the other hand, Book Value Factors, jumped out as looking problematic. Centene publishes concerning book value factor metrics in this report. price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 1.5 and represents -18.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 16.77%. They does not yet appear to be headed in the right direction to achieve strong book value metrics. Consequently, their book value factors movement received a grade of 68. Their balance sheet received an overall score of 91. income statement Centene appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Centene reported impressive EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 6.5B, representing 3.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 30.38%. Its EBITDA metrics highlight an impressive overall financial performance, which is expected to continue moving forward. Therefore, its EBITDA component earned a score of 75. Also, Centene's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 5.6, representing a change of 20.00%. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. The company's return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 74. That said, one metric, Revenue Efficiency, stood out as particularly concerning. Centene management did an underwhelming job managing revenue efficiency this past period. Centene's revenue efficiency is 137.0B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 1.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 15.78% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency does not make a compelling case for upward pressure on the company's stock price. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 72. Therefore, we scored its income statement a 77. cash flow Free Cash flow and Net Cash Flow stand out as the most significant drivers of Centene's cash flow's strength. Centene did a great job related to free cash flow this period, which stood at 14.8, representing a 62.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 0.97%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. The company's free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 93. Also, Centene's management was effective in improving their net cash flow, which now sits at 4.7B and represents a 628.00% change from the previous report. The company is headed in the right direction regarding business priorities, exhibiting prudent net cash flow management and growth. Consequently, their net cash flow movement received a grade of 76. That said, one metric, Asset Turnover, stood out as particularly concerning. Asset turnover metrics during this period were surprisingly weak. Their reported asset turnover metrics of 1.6, which represents a -6.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 2.11% percent by this parameter. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly less impressive when compared to their peers and competitors. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 54. Therefore, we scored its cash flow a 77. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Centene's stock is now priced above its 5-day and 50-day, but below its 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in both the short and medium-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Centene's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal negative momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 57.
26,446	fundamental summary According to their recent financial report, which was published on Apr 27, 2023, Chipotle Mexican Grill had several impressive financial metrics that should make them more attractive than their peers going forward. Their growth and value factors performance indicate that company management is focused on the right targets and executing well. There should be significant upside potential for the stock looking forward. As such, Chipotle Mexican Grill received an overall score of 81 and a BUY recommendation. balance sheet Chipotle Mexican Grill appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Chipotle Mexican Grill's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 22.9 and represents 43.00% change from the previous report. Their industry-leading book value factors momentum reinforces an expectation for future positive momentum for their stock price going forward. Consequently, their book value factors movement received a grade of 92. Also, Chipotle Mexican Grill did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 2.5B, representing a 5.00% change. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 2.17% percent by this parameter. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. The company's equity movement component, therefore, received a grade of 89. That said, one metric, Liabilities, stood out as particularly concerning. Chipotle Mexican Grill's liabilities stood at 4.6B in the current filing, which represents a 0.00% change from the previous report. This performance is relatively weak in comparison to their peers and suggests that its's stock price will likely suffer until this is solved. Discouraging results like these statistically lead to negative movement in stock prices, so we rated their liabilities movement component 66. The company's balance sheet received an overall score of 89. income statement Return Factors and EBITDA stand out as the most significant drivers of Chipotle Mexican Grill's income statement's strength. In this filing, Chipotle Mexican Grill reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 44.7, which represents a change of 16.00%. The company appears headed in the right direction in terms of these return factors, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 87. Also, Chipotle Mexican Grill reported impressive EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 2.2B, representing 10.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 18.90%. Its EBITDA metrics highlight an impressive overall financial performance, which is expected to continue moving forward. Consequently, their EBITDA movement received a grade of 85. On the other hand, Revenue Efficiency, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Chipotle Mexican Grill's revenue efficiency metrics look especially concerning this period, highlighting issues management is having controlling and reducing expenses while increasing earnings. This metric might have a 19.36% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', isn't encouraging. Its revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 54. Therefore, we scored its income statement a 72. cash flow Chipotle Mexican Grill appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Free cash flow numbers published by Chipotle Mexican Grill were 35.8, which was a 18.00% change from the previous filing. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.71%. These free cash flow numbers show that management has executed well while generating cash flow and encouraging growth. Therefore, its free cash flow movement earned a score of 75. Also, Chipotle Mexican Grill presents exciting net cash flow numbers for its recent financial release, illustrated by a net cash flow of -211.9M, which is a change of 52.00% from the last filing. This industry-leading net cash flow momentum should reinforce broader positive momentum for its's stock price going forward. The company's net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 72. At the same time, one critical cash flow metric, Asset Turnover, was notably weak. Chipotle Mexican Grill's asset turnover metrics were concerning and highlighted potential issues management is having effectively turning assets into sales efficiently. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 1.3, representing a 4.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 1.59%. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly less impressive when compared to their peers and competitors. Therefore, their asset turnover movement earned a score of 53. Because the company's management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash flow was given a score of 68. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Chipotle Mexican Grill's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Chipotle Mexican Grill's stock appears overbought. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 73.
26,642	fundamental summary Coca-Cola's financial results from Q1 demonstrated decent performance, but will likely only help Coca-Cola remain on par with its peers. Its growth, value, and income factors all individually appear positive and give support for optimism regarding the likelihood of continued positive performance. As such, Coca-Cola received an overall score of 71 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Coca-Cola appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Coca-Cola's management was effective in improving its cash and cash equivalents metrics, which now sit at 12.0B. This represents 26.00% change from the last reporting period. Its impressive cash and cash equivalents metrics should support upward pressure on its's stock price. Therefore, its cash and cash equivalents movement earned a score of 87. Also, Coca-Cola did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 25.2B, representing a 5.00% change. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 13.12% percent by this parameter. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. The company's equity movement component, therefore, received a grade of 87. On the other hand, Book Value Factors, jumped out as looking problematic. Coca-Cola publishes concerning book value factor metrics in this report. price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 10.3 and represents -9.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 5.29%. They does not yet appear to be headed in the right direction to achieve strong book value metrics. Therefore, their book value factors earned a score of 54. Consequently, its balance sheet earned a rank of 90. income statement Coca-Cola seems to be balancing strong Revenue Efficiency and EBITDA along with an overall impressive positive income statement. Coca-Cola did an excellent job managing its revenue efficiency this past period. Coca-Cola's revenue efficiency is 43.5B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 1.00% change from the previous report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 5.89%. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', should support a positive movement in the company's stock price. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 76. Also, Coca-Cola's management did a remarkable job this period managing its EBITDA. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 13.9B, which represents a -0.00% change from the last period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 31.07%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 67. On the other hand, Return Factors, jumped out as looking problematic. Coca-Cola's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 36.8, representing a change of -2.00%. This metric might have a 3.10% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. The company's return factor metrics return on equity and return on assets are even more concerning when compared to their peers. Its return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 66. their income statement received an overall score of 67. cash flow Coca-Cola appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Coca-Cola's published asset turnover numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. Coca-Cola recorded asset turnover of 0.5, which represents a -1.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 5.60% percent by this parameter. Its asset turnover metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 69. Also, Coca-Cola's management was effective in improving its CapEx, which now sits at -1.5B and represents -4.00% change from the previous report. This remarkable CapEx growth is expected to reinforce upward momentum for its's stock price going forward. Consequently, their CapEx movement received a grade of 62. That said, one metric, Net Cash Flow, stood out as strongly negative. Coca-Cola's produced underwhelming cash flow numbers in this filing. Net cash flow was reported as 4.3B, which is a 2244.00% change from the last report. Coca-Cola's net cash flow metrics are especially disappointing relative to their peers. Its net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 52. Their cash flow, therefore, earned a score of 60. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Coca-Cola's stock is now priced below its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a negative setup in the near, medium, and long-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Coca-Cola's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 42.
26,893	fundamental summary Looking at Conagra Brands's financials of Q1 reflected decent results. It is highly likely that the company will be mostly tethered to market performance and sector movements for the near term. Bottom line, Conagra Brands's financials indicate solid performance in terms of value and growth, which leads us to believe that they may become interesting again in the next few months. But for right now, we gave the company an overall grade of 72 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Conagra Brands appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Conagra Brands's management was effective in improving its cash and cash equivalents metrics, which now sit at 71.2M. This represents 79.00% change from the last reporting period. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. It suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect its actual intrinsic value. Consequently, their cash and cash equivalents movement received a grade of 96. Also, Conagra Brands's management was effective in managing the value of the assets on their balance sheet, which now sits at 22.5B and represents a 0.00% change from the previous report. This performance is interesting in comparison to its peers and competitors. Consequently, their asset movement received a grade of 76. On the other hand, Liabilities, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Conagra Brands's liabilities stood at 13.5B in the current filing, which represents a -1.00% change from the previous report. This performance is relatively weak in comparison to their peers and suggests that its's stock price will likely suffer until this is solved. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 63. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 81. income statement Conagra Brands appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics, especially EBITDA and Revenue Efficiency. Conagra Brands's management did a remarkable job this period managing its EBITDA. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 2.3B, which represents a 4.00% change from the last period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 31.07%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its EBITDA component earned a score of 83. Also, Conagra Brands reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 5.89%. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', should support a positive movement in the company's stock price. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 74. That said, one metric, Return Factors, stood out as strongly negative. In this filing, Conagra Brands reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 9.0, which represents a growth of 16.00%. This metric might have a 3.10% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. These numbers show that management has been unsuccessful in fostering appropriate growth related to return on assets and return on equity momentum relative to their peers. Therefore, their return factors component earned a score of 72. their income statement received an overall score of 81. cash flow Conagra Brands appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Conagra Brands's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. Conagra Brands recorded CapEx of -362.3M, which represents 5.00% change from the previous report. The company appears to be headed in the right direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. The company's CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 82. Also, Conagra Brands is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.5, representing a 2.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 5.60% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Its asset turnover metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. The company's asset turnover movement, therefore, received a grade of 58. However, one discouraging result, Net Cash Flow, stood out. Conagra Brands's net cash flow metrics were -8.5M according to their current filing, which represents a 71.00% change from the previous report. Conagra Brands's net cash flow metrics are especially disappointing relative to their peers. Consequently, their net cash flow movement received a grade of 55. Consequently, the company's cash flow earned a score of 61. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Conagra Brands's stock is now priced below its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a negative setup in the near, medium, and long-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Conagra Brands's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 42.
27,023	fundamental summary Copart published its Q1 report on May 25, 2023 with positive results, but no significant factors particularly remarkable relative to its peers. Its growth, value, and income factors all individually appear positive and give support for optimism regarding the likelihood of continued positive performance. Therefore, they earned a total score of 76 out of 100 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the balance sheet strength in Copart's recent report: Book Value Factors and Cash & Equivalents. Copart's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 7.5 and represents 23.00% change from the previous report. These book value factor numbers show that management has been prudent in focusing on efficient growth. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its book value factors earned a score of 93. Also, Copart's management was effective in improving its cash and cash equivalents metrics, which now sit at 2.1B. This represents 27.00% change from the last reporting period. This impressive growth, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. The company's cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 89. That said, one metric, Assets, stood out as particularly concerning. Mediocre performance in terms of assets could drop the bar on expectations for Copart's future attractiveness, as they changed to 6.3B in the latest filing. This works out to a 7.00% change from the last period. This unimpressive metric is weaker than its peers and competitors. Its asset component, therefore, received a grade of 68. Similarly, because the company's management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 81. income statement Copart seems to be balancing strong EBITDA and Revenue Efficiency along with an overall impressive positive income statement. Copart's management was effective in improving its EBIDTA, which now sits at 1.6B and represents a 3.00% change from the last reporting period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 9.69%. The company is headed in the right direction regarding EBITDA, exhibiting efficient capital controls and strong overall financial performance. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 70. Also, Copart's financials reveal an interesting trend for their revenue efficiency. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 24.16%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 66. That said, one metric, Return Factors, stood out as strongly negative. Return factors metrics and ratios were disappointing in this report. Copart reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 23.2, representing a change of -0.00% from the last report.change of -0.00% from the previous period. This metric might have a 22.64% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. The company's return factor metrics return on equity and return on assets are even more concerning when compared to their peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 64. Consequently, the companie's income statement earned a rank of 67. cash flow Overall, Copart's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Copart did a great job related to free cash flow this period, which stood at 1.8, representing a 10.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 4.12%. These free cash flow numbers show that management has executed well while generating cash flow and encouraging growth. Consequently, their free cash flow movement received a grade of 72. Also, Copart's strong net cash flow numbers, which were 659.4M in this filing, showed a -4.00% change from the last period. This industry-leading net cash flow momentum should reinforce broader positive momentum for its's stock price going forward. Consequently, their net cash flow movement received a grade of 66. That said, one metric, Asset Turnover, stood out as particularly concerning. Copart's asset turnover numbers were discouraging, reflecting significant concerns related to management's ability to leverage assets to generate sales effectively and efficiently. Copart recorded asset turnover of 0.6, which represents a -4.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 5.26% percent by this parameter. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly less impressive when compared to their peers and competitors. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 56. Therefore, we scored its cash flow a 65. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Copart's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Copart's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 78.
27,023	fundamental summary Copart published its Q1 report on May 25, 2023 with positive results, but no significant factors particularly remarkable relative to its peers. Its growth, value, and income factors all individually appear positive and give support for optimism regarding the likelihood of continued positive performance. Therefore, they earned a total score of 76 out of 100 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the balance sheet strength in Copart's recent report: Book Value Factors and Cash & Equivalents. Copart's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 7.5 and represents 23.00% change from the previous report. These book value factor numbers show that management has been prudent in focusing on efficient growth. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its book value factors earned a score of 93. Also, Copart's management was effective in improving its cash and cash equivalents metrics, which now sit at 2.1B. This represents 27.00% change from the last reporting period. This impressive growth, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. The company's cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 89. That said, one metric, Assets, stood out as particularly concerning. Mediocre performance in terms of assets could drop the bar on expectations for Copart's future attractiveness, as they changed to 6.3B in the latest filing. This works out to a 7.00% change from the last period. This unimpressive metric is weaker than its peers and competitors. Its asset component, therefore, received a grade of 68. Similarly, because the company's management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 81. income statement Copart seems to be balancing strong EBITDA and Revenue Efficiency along with an overall impressive positive income statement. Copart's management was effective in improving its EBIDTA, which now sits at 1.6B and represents a 3.00% change from the last reporting period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 9.69%. The company is headed in the right direction regarding EBITDA, exhibiting efficient capital controls and strong overall financial performance. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 70. Also, Copart's financials reveal an interesting trend for their revenue efficiency. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 24.16%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 66. That said, one metric, Return Factors, stood out as strongly negative. Return factors metrics and ratios were disappointing in this report. Copart reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 23.2, representing a change of -0.00% from the last report.change of -0.00% from the previous period. This metric might have a 22.64% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. The company's return factor metrics return on equity and return on assets are even more concerning when compared to their peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 64. Consequently, the companie's income statement earned a rank of 67. cash flow Overall, Copart's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Copart did a great job related to free cash flow this period, which stood at 1.8, representing a 10.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 4.12%. These free cash flow numbers show that management has executed well while generating cash flow and encouraging growth. Consequently, their free cash flow movement received a grade of 72. Also, Copart's strong net cash flow numbers, which were 659.4M in this filing, showed a -4.00% change from the last period. This industry-leading net cash flow momentum should reinforce broader positive momentum for its's stock price going forward. Consequently, their net cash flow movement received a grade of 66. That said, one metric, Asset Turnover, stood out as particularly concerning. Copart's asset turnover numbers were discouraging, reflecting significant concerns related to management's ability to leverage assets to generate sales effectively and efficiently. Copart recorded asset turnover of 0.6, which represents a -4.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 5.26% percent by this parameter. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly less impressive when compared to their peers and competitors. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 56. Therefore, we scored its cash flow a 65. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Copart's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Copart's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 78.
27,198	fundamental summary At a high level, the metrics from Crown Castle's Q1 financial report release were demonstrably negative. Specifically, their growth, value, and income factors indicate an execution challenge when it comes to generating exciting and consistent growth. These results suggest a challenging future for Crown Castle's stock. As such, Crown Castle received an overall score of 57 and a UNDERPERFORM recommendation. balance sheet Crown Castle appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Crown Castle did a great job related to cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 187.0M, representing a 20.00% change from the previous filing. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. It suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect its actual intrinsic value. Consequently, their cash and cash equivalents movement received a grade of 85. Also, The company's assets section could set high expectations for Crown Castle's future attractiveness, as they went to 39.1B, which is a 0.00% change from the last period. These results, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. Consequently, their asset movement received a grade of 70. On the other hand, Book Value Factors, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Crown Castle's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 6.7 and represents -17.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 17.42%. Their book value factor metrics are even more concerning when compared to their peers. Therefore, their book value factors earned a score of 45. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 61. income statement Crown Castle's recently published income statement showed overall, underwhelming numbers. Both Revenue Efficiency and Return Factors were particularly concerning. Crown Castle management did an underwhelming job managing revenue efficiency this past period. Crown Castle's revenue efficiency is 7.0B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 0.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 2.87% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Its uninspiring revenue efficiency is even more concerning relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. Its revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 57. Also, Return factors metrics and ratios were disappointing in this report. Crown Castle reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 21.9, representing a change of 3.00% from the last report.change of 3.00% from the previous period. This metric might have a 1.37% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. They does not yet appear to be headed in the right direction regarding these return on equity and return on assets metrics. Therefore, their return factors component earned a score of 58. However, one encouraging metric, EBITDA, stood out. Crown Castle reported impressive EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 5.0B, representing 0.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 5.72%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 68. Its income statement, therefore, earned a score of 58. cash flow Crown Castle's recently published cash flow showed overall, underwhelming numbers. Both Capital Expenditure and Asset Turnover were particularly concerning. Crown Castle's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were discouraging and reflected management's unbalanced growth strategy. Crown Castle recorded CapEx of -1.4B, which represents a -5.00% change from the previous report. The company's disappointing CapEx growth is expected to stunt the momentum they hoped for this period. Its CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 51. Also, Crown Castle's asset turnover metrics were concerning and highlighted potential issues management is having effectively turning assets into sales efficiently. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.2, representing a 0.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 8.43%. Their lackluster asset turnover metrics, specifically in contrast to leading industry peers' performance, could present significant headwinds. Therefore, their asset turnover movement earned a score of 51. However, one encouraging metric, Net Cash Flow, stood out. Crown Castle's strong net cash flow numbers, which were -94.0M in this filing, showed a 32.00% change from the last period. The company is headed in the right direction regarding business priorities, exhibiting prudent net cash flow management and growth. Consequently, their net cash flow movement received a grade of 68. Because of these weaknesses, the company's cash flow received an overall score of 56. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Crown Castle's stock is now priced above its 5-day, but below its 50-day and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near-term. The company is trading near it's 12-month low, which signals it struggle to keep above it support price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Crown Castle's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 42.
27,504	fundamental summary DENTSPLY SIRONA's recently released results from Q1 indicate that DENTSPLY SIRONA is performing reasonably well and on par with its peers. We do believe, though, that macro-related market conditions will influence DENTSPLY SIRONA's performance more significantly than its individual results. Therefore, DENTSPLY SIRONA received an overall score of 72, translating into a HOLD ranking. balance sheet Overall, DENTSPLY SIRONA's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. DENTSPLY SIRONA did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 3.6B, representing a -4.00% change. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 9.65% percent by this parameter. These metrics are all the more impressive relative to their peers and should support an upswing in their stock price. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 85. Also, In terms of liabilities, DENTSPLY SIRONA published good numbers. Their reported liabilities were 4.0B, representing a 5.00% change from the previous report. These liabilities changes appear balanced compared to their peers and project the message that management is capable and focused on balancing asset growth, resource allocation, and growing liabilities. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 78. That said, one metric, Cash & Equivalents, stood out as particularly concerning. DENTSPLY SIRONA's management did a relatively poor job managing cash and cash equivalents, which now sit at 318.0M and represents a -13.00% change from the last reporting period. This performance is significantly less impressive than its peers and competitors. Its cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 56. Its balance sheet, therefore, earned a score of 82. income statement Overall, DENTSPLY SIRONA's critical income statement metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. DENTSPLY SIRONA's financials reveal an interesting trend for their revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 15.78%. Their impressive revenue efficiency is even more impressive relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 75. Also, DENTSPLY SIRONA's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was -24.5, representing a change of -14.00%. The company appears headed in the right direction in terms of these return factors, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 73. However, one discouraging result, EBITDA, stood out. DENTSPLY SIRONA reported concerning EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 728.8M, representing -5.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 30.38% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their EBITDA metrics are even more problematic when compared to their peers. Therefore, their EBITDA component earned a score of 62. Consequently, their income statement earned a rank of 67. cash flow DENTSPLY SIRONA appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. DENTSPLY SIRONA is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.5, representing a 0.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 2.11%. Their impressive asset turnover metrics, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support a tailwind in the company's stock price. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 78. Also, DENTSPLY SIRONA's management was effective in improving its CapEx, which now sits at -144.0M and represents 3.00% change from the previous report. The company appears to be headed in the right direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. The company's CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 74. That said, one metric, Free Cash flow, stood out as strongly negative. Free cash flow numbers published by DENTSPLY SIRONA were 1.2, which was a -29.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 0.97%. their free cash flow situation appears to be much weaker than their peers. Management needs to do a better job balancing cash flow, asset growth, and resources allocations in general. Its free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 47. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash flow was given a score of 69. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. DENTSPLY SIRONA's stock is now priced above its 200-day, but below its 5-day and 50-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the long-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), DENTSPLY SIRONA's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 52.
27,685	fundamental summary Dollar Tree's recently released results from Q1 indicate that Dollar Tree is performing reasonably well and on par with its peers. Its income and value factors appear positive and give support for optimism regarding the likelihood of continued positive performance. Therefore, Dollar Tree received an overall score of 68, translating into a HOLD ranking. balance sheet Dollar Tree appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Dollar Tree did a great job related to cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 872.8M, representing a 36.00% change from the previous filing. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. It suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect its actual intrinsic value. Therefore, its cash and cash equivalents movement earned a score of 90. Also, Dollar Tree did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 8.9B, representing a 2.00% change. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 13.12% percent by this parameter. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 77. On the other hand, Book Value Factors, jumped out as looking problematic. Dollar Tree publishes discouraging results related to book value factors in this report. As of the current filing, price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 3.4, representing a -9.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 5.29%. They does not yet appear to be headed in the right direction to achieve strong book value metrics. Therefore, their book value factors earned a score of 53. Consequently, its balance sheet earned a rank of 83. income statement Dollar Tree's recently published income statement showed overall, underwhelming numbers. Both EBITDA and Return Factors were particularly concerning. Dollar Tree reported concerning EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 4.9B, representing -5.00% change from the previous period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 31.07%. The company's EBITDA metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Its EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 51. Also, Return factors metrics and ratios were disappointing in this report. Dollar Tree reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 16.1, representing a change of -18.00% from the last report.change of -18.00% from the previous period. This metric might have a 3.10% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. The company's return factor metrics return on equity and return on assets are even more concerning when compared to their peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 59. On the other hand, Revenue Efficiency, jumped out as looking rather positive. Dollar Tree did an excellent job managing its revenue efficiency this past period. Dollar Tree's revenue efficiency is 28.8B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 1.00% change from the previous report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 5.89%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 72. Consequently, the companie's income statement earned a rank of 51. cash flow Free Cash flow and Net Cash Flow stand out as the most significant drivers of Dollar Tree's cash flow's strength. Dollar Tree did a great job related to free cash flow this period, which stood at 2.2, representing a 32.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 11.15%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Therefore, its free cash flow movement earned a score of 82. Also, Dollar Tree presents exciting net cash flow numbers for its recent financial release, illustrated by a net cash flow of -329.9M, which is a change of -1.00% from the last filing. This industry-leading net cash flow momentum should reinforce broader positive momentum for its's stock price going forward. The company's net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 80. On the other hand, Capital Expenditure, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Dollar Tree's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were discouraging and reflected management's unbalanced growth strategy. Dollar Tree recorded CapEx of -1.3B, which represents a -8.00% change from the previous report. They appears to be headed in the wrong direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Therefore, their CapEx movement component earned a score of 56. Their cash flow received an overall score of 80. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Dollar Tree's stock is now priced above its 5-day, but below its 50-day and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near-term. The company is trading near it's 12-month low, which signals it struggle to keep above it support price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Dollar Tree's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 52.
27,685	fundamental summary Dollar Tree's recently released results from Q1 indicate that Dollar Tree is performing reasonably well and on par with its peers. Its income and value factors appear positive and give support for optimism regarding the likelihood of continued positive performance. Therefore, Dollar Tree received an overall score of 68, translating into a HOLD ranking. balance sheet Dollar Tree appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Dollar Tree did a great job related to cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 872.8M, representing a 36.00% change from the previous filing. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. It suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect its actual intrinsic value. Therefore, its cash and cash equivalents movement earned a score of 90. Also, Dollar Tree did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 8.9B, representing a 2.00% change. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 13.12% percent by this parameter. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 77. On the other hand, Book Value Factors, jumped out as looking problematic. Dollar Tree publishes discouraging results related to book value factors in this report. As of the current filing, price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 3.4, representing a -9.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 5.29%. They does not yet appear to be headed in the right direction to achieve strong book value metrics. Therefore, their book value factors earned a score of 53. Consequently, its balance sheet earned a rank of 83. income statement Dollar Tree's recently published income statement showed overall, underwhelming numbers. Both EBITDA and Return Factors were particularly concerning. Dollar Tree reported concerning EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 4.9B, representing -5.00% change from the previous period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 31.07%. The company's EBITDA metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Its EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 51. Also, Return factors metrics and ratios were disappointing in this report. Dollar Tree reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 16.1, representing a change of -18.00% from the last report.change of -18.00% from the previous period. This metric might have a 3.10% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. The company's return factor metrics return on equity and return on assets are even more concerning when compared to their peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 59. On the other hand, Revenue Efficiency, jumped out as looking rather positive. Dollar Tree did an excellent job managing its revenue efficiency this past period. Dollar Tree's revenue efficiency is 28.8B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 1.00% change from the previous report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 5.89%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 72. Consequently, the companie's income statement earned a rank of 51. cash flow Free Cash flow and Net Cash Flow stand out as the most significant drivers of Dollar Tree's cash flow's strength. Dollar Tree did a great job related to free cash flow this period, which stood at 2.2, representing a 32.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 11.15%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Therefore, its free cash flow movement earned a score of 82. Also, Dollar Tree presents exciting net cash flow numbers for its recent financial release, illustrated by a net cash flow of -329.9M, which is a change of -1.00% from the last filing. This industry-leading net cash flow momentum should reinforce broader positive momentum for its's stock price going forward. The company's net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 80. On the other hand, Capital Expenditure, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Dollar Tree's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were discouraging and reflected management's unbalanced growth strategy. Dollar Tree recorded CapEx of -1.3B, which represents a -8.00% change from the previous report. They appears to be headed in the wrong direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Therefore, their CapEx movement component earned a score of 56. Their cash flow received an overall score of 80. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Dollar Tree's stock is now priced above its 5-day, but below its 50-day and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near-term. The company is trading near it's 12-month low, which signals it struggle to keep above it support price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Dollar Tree's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 52.
27,862	fundamental summary eBay's recently released results from Q1 indicate that eBay is performing reasonably well and on par with its peers. The company's growth and value factors appear positive and give support for optimism regarding the likelihood of continued positive performance. Therefore, eBay received an overall score of 75, translating into a HOLD ranking. balance sheet Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the balance sheet strength in eBay's recent report: Equity and Book Value Factors. eBay reported solid equity numbers this period. At filing, equity was reported as 5.4B, representing 5.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 2.17% percent by this parameter. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. Therefore, its equity movement component earned a score of 90. Also, eBay's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 4.6 and represents 3.00% change from the previous report. These book value factor numbers show that management has been prudent in focusing on efficient growth. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its book value factors earned a score of 83. At the same time, one critical balance sheet metric, Liabilities, was notably weak. eBay's liabilities stood at 14.6B in the current filing, which represents a -7.00% change from the previous report. These liabilities metrics show that management has been unsuccessful in encouraging healthy growth while managing liabilities. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 44. The company's balance sheet received an overall score of 79. income statement eBay appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. In this filing, eBay reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 10.2, which represents a change of 160.00%. The company appears headed in the right direction in terms of these return factors, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 79. Also, eBay reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 19.36%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. As a result, its revenue efficiency earned a score of 76. However, one discouraging result, EBITDA, stood out. eBay's EBIDTA now sits at 2.9B and represents -4.00% change from the last reporting period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 18.90%. eBay appears to be headed in the wrong direction in terms of EBITDA momentum, likely due to insufficient capital controls and a weaker than expected overall financial performance. Therefore, their EBITDA component earned a score of 71. Consequently, their income statement earned a rank of 75. cash flow eBay's recently published cash flow conveys disappointing growth, particularly with respect to Asset Turnover and Capital Expenditure. metrics. eBay's asset turnover numbers were discouraging, reflecting significant concerns related to management's ability to leverage assets to generate sales effectively and efficiently. eBay recorded asset turnover of 0.5, which represents a 11.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 1.59% percent by this parameter. The company's asset turnover metrics seem especially problematic relative to their peers. Underwhelming results in asset turnover metrics often lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated its asset turnover momentum 44. Also, eBay's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were discouraging and reflected management's unbalanced growth strategy. eBay recorded CapEx of -498.0M, which represents a -11.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more uninspiring relative to their peers and competitors. Its CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 53. However, one encouraging metric, Free Cash flow, stood out. eBay did a great job related to free cash flow this period, which stood at 3.6, representing a 12.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 2.71%. The company's free cash flow metrics are especially strong compared to its peers. Management seems to balance cash flow management, asset growth, and resource allocations in general. Therefore, its free cash flow movement earned a score of 72. Therefore, it received a cautionary score of 59. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. eBay's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), eBay's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 78.
27,862	fundamental summary eBay's recently released results from Q1 indicate that eBay is performing reasonably well and on par with its peers. The company's growth and value factors appear positive and give support for optimism regarding the likelihood of continued positive performance. Therefore, eBay received an overall score of 75, translating into a HOLD ranking. balance sheet Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the balance sheet strength in eBay's recent report: Equity and Book Value Factors. eBay reported solid equity numbers this period. At filing, equity was reported as 5.4B, representing 5.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 2.17% percent by this parameter. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. Therefore, its equity movement component earned a score of 90. Also, eBay's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 4.6 and represents 3.00% change from the previous report. These book value factor numbers show that management has been prudent in focusing on efficient growth. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its book value factors earned a score of 83. At the same time, one critical balance sheet metric, Liabilities, was notably weak. eBay's liabilities stood at 14.6B in the current filing, which represents a -7.00% change from the previous report. These liabilities metrics show that management has been unsuccessful in encouraging healthy growth while managing liabilities. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 44. The company's balance sheet received an overall score of 79. income statement eBay appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. In this filing, eBay reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 10.2, which represents a change of 160.00%. The company appears headed in the right direction in terms of these return factors, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 79. Also, eBay reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 19.36%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. As a result, its revenue efficiency earned a score of 76. However, one discouraging result, EBITDA, stood out. eBay's EBIDTA now sits at 2.9B and represents -4.00% change from the last reporting period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 18.90%. eBay appears to be headed in the wrong direction in terms of EBITDA momentum, likely due to insufficient capital controls and a weaker than expected overall financial performance. Therefore, their EBITDA component earned a score of 71. Consequently, their income statement earned a rank of 75. cash flow eBay's recently published cash flow conveys disappointing growth, particularly with respect to Asset Turnover and Capital Expenditure. metrics. eBay's asset turnover numbers were discouraging, reflecting significant concerns related to management's ability to leverage assets to generate sales effectively and efficiently. eBay recorded asset turnover of 0.5, which represents a 11.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 1.59% percent by this parameter. The company's asset turnover metrics seem especially problematic relative to their peers. Underwhelming results in asset turnover metrics often lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated its asset turnover momentum 44. Also, eBay's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were discouraging and reflected management's unbalanced growth strategy. eBay recorded CapEx of -498.0M, which represents a -11.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more uninspiring relative to their peers and competitors. Its CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 53. However, one encouraging metric, Free Cash flow, stood out. eBay did a great job related to free cash flow this period, which stood at 3.6, representing a 12.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 2.71%. The company's free cash flow metrics are especially strong compared to its peers. Management seems to balance cash flow management, asset growth, and resource allocations in general. Therefore, its free cash flow movement earned a score of 72. Therefore, it received a cautionary score of 59. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. eBay's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), eBay's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 78.
27,963	fundamental summary Electronic Arts published its Q1 report on May 24, 2023 with positive results, but no significant factors particularly remarkable relative to its peers. Its income and value factors appear positive and give support for optimism regarding the likelihood of continued positive performance. Overall, Electronic Arts's income and value factors are trending positively, and we, therefore, give Electronic Arts an overall grade of 67 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Two main balance sheet metrics are driving the positive outlook for Electronic Arts's financial strength going forward. Electronic Arts produced great equity metrics for this filing, demonstrating management's skill in increasing shareholder value. Electronic Arts's equity was reported as 7.3B, which represents a -3.00% change from the last report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 7.63%. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. Therefore, its equity movement component earned a score of 91. Also, The company's assets section could set high expectations for Electronic Arts's future attractiveness, as they went to 13.5B, which is a -0.00% change from the last period. These results, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. Consequently, their asset movement received a grade of 82. At the same time, one critical balance sheet metric, Liabilities, was notably weak. At filing, Electronic Arts's liabilities were 6.2B, representing a 4.00% change from the previous period. Electronic Arts's liabilities changes appear mediocre compared to their peers. Contextually, they convey that management finds balancing asset growth, resource allocation, and liabilities challenging. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 51. Therefore, we scored its balance sheet a 71. income statement Electronic Arts's income statement showed strong financials, specifically Revenue Efficiency and EBITDA. Electronic Arts's financials reveal an interesting trend for their revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 11.83%. Their impressive revenue efficiency is even more impressive relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 69. Also, Electronic Arts's management was effective in improving its EBIDTA, which now sits at 2.1B and represents a -4.00% change from the last reporting period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 17.24%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its EBITDA component earned a score of 59. On the other hand, Return Factors, jumped out as looking problematic. Electronic Arts's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 10.8, representing a change of -22.00%. This metric might have a 6.57% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. The company's return factor metrics return on equity and return on assets are even more concerning when compared to their peers. Therefore, their return factors component earned a score of 52. their income statement received an overall score of 60. cash flow Electronic Arts appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Electronic Arts did a great job related to free cash flow this period, which stood at 4.8, representing a 16.00% change from the previous filing. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.18%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Therefore, its free cash flow movement earned a score of 80. Also, Electronic Arts's management was effective in improving their net cash flow, which now sits at -308.0M and represents a 34.00% change from the previous report. The company is headed in the right direction regarding business priorities, exhibiting prudent net cash flow management and growth. The company's net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 78. At the same time, one critical cash flow metric, Asset Turnover, was notably weak. Asset turnover metrics during this period were surprisingly weak. Their reported asset turnover metrics of 0.5, which represents a 1.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 2.38% percent by this parameter. Their lackluster asset turnover metrics, specifically in contrast to leading industry peers' performance, could present significant headwinds. Underwhelming results in asset turnover metrics often lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated its asset turnover momentum 73. Because the company's management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash flow was given a score of 80. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Electronic Arts's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Electronic Arts's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 83.
27,963	fundamental summary Electronic Arts published its Q1 report on May 24, 2023 with positive results, but no significant factors particularly remarkable relative to its peers. Its income and value factors appear positive and give support for optimism regarding the likelihood of continued positive performance. Overall, Electronic Arts's income and value factors are trending positively, and we, therefore, give Electronic Arts an overall grade of 67 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Two main balance sheet metrics are driving the positive outlook for Electronic Arts's financial strength going forward. Electronic Arts produced great equity metrics for this filing, demonstrating management's skill in increasing shareholder value. Electronic Arts's equity was reported as 7.3B, which represents a -3.00% change from the last report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 7.63%. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. Therefore, its equity movement component earned a score of 91. Also, The company's assets section could set high expectations for Electronic Arts's future attractiveness, as they went to 13.5B, which is a -0.00% change from the last period. These results, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. Consequently, their asset movement received a grade of 82. At the same time, one critical balance sheet metric, Liabilities, was notably weak. At filing, Electronic Arts's liabilities were 6.2B, representing a 4.00% change from the previous period. Electronic Arts's liabilities changes appear mediocre compared to their peers. Contextually, they convey that management finds balancing asset growth, resource allocation, and liabilities challenging. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 51. Therefore, we scored its balance sheet a 71. income statement Electronic Arts's income statement showed strong financials, specifically Revenue Efficiency and EBITDA. Electronic Arts's financials reveal an interesting trend for their revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 11.83%. Their impressive revenue efficiency is even more impressive relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 69. Also, Electronic Arts's management was effective in improving its EBIDTA, which now sits at 2.1B and represents a -4.00% change from the last reporting period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 17.24%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its EBITDA component earned a score of 59. On the other hand, Return Factors, jumped out as looking problematic. Electronic Arts's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 10.8, representing a change of -22.00%. This metric might have a 6.57% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. The company's return factor metrics return on equity and return on assets are even more concerning when compared to their peers. Therefore, their return factors component earned a score of 52. their income statement received an overall score of 60. cash flow Electronic Arts appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Electronic Arts did a great job related to free cash flow this period, which stood at 4.8, representing a 16.00% change from the previous filing. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.18%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Therefore, its free cash flow movement earned a score of 80. Also, Electronic Arts's management was effective in improving their net cash flow, which now sits at -308.0M and represents a 34.00% change from the previous report. The company is headed in the right direction regarding business priorities, exhibiting prudent net cash flow management and growth. The company's net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 78. At the same time, one critical cash flow metric, Asset Turnover, was notably weak. Asset turnover metrics during this period were surprisingly weak. Their reported asset turnover metrics of 0.5, which represents a 1.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 2.38% percent by this parameter. Their lackluster asset turnover metrics, specifically in contrast to leading industry peers' performance, could present significant headwinds. Underwhelming results in asset turnover metrics often lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated its asset turnover momentum 73. Because the company's management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash flow was given a score of 80. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Electronic Arts's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Electronic Arts's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 83.
28,202	fundamental summary Equinix's financial results from Q1 demonstrated decent performance, but will likely only help Equinix remain on par with its peers. It is highly likely that the company will be mostly tethered to market performance and sector movements for the near term. Therefore, Equinix received an overall score of 78, translating into a BUY ranking. balance sheet Equinix appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Equinix did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 12.0B, representing a 5.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 9.70%. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. The company's equity movement component, therefore, received a grade of 94. Also, Equinix did a great job related to cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 2.6B, representing a 39.00% change from the previous filing. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. It suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect its actual intrinsic value. Consequently, their cash and cash equivalents movement received a grade of 90. That said, one metric, Liabilities, stood out as particularly concerning. Equinix's liabilities stood at 19.2B in the current filing, which represents a 2.00% change from the previous report. Equinix's liabilities changes appear mediocre compared to their peers. Contextually, they convey that management finds balancing asset growth, resource allocation, and liabilities challenging. Its liabilities movement component, therefore, received a grade of 58. Therefore, we scored the company's balance sheet a 83. income statement Equinix seems to be balancing strong EBITDA and Revenue Efficiency along with an overall impressive positive income statement. Equinix's management did a remarkable job this period managing its EBITDA. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 2.8B, which represents a 5.00% change from the last period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 5.72%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its EBITDA component earned a score of 86. Also, Equinix reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.87%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 79. On the other hand, Return Factors, jumped out as looking problematic. In this filing, Equinix reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 7.1, which represents a growth of 13.00%. This metric might have a 1.37% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. The company's return factor metrics return on equity and return on assets are even more concerning when compared to their peers. Its return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 73. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the income statement was given a score of 82. cash flow Net Cash Flow and Free Cash flow stand out as the most significant drivers of Equinix's cash flow's strength. Equinix presents exciting net cash flow numbers for its recent financial release, illustrated by a net cash flow of 936.1M, which is a change of 161.00% from the last filing. The company is headed in the right direction regarding business priorities, exhibiting prudent net cash flow management and growth. The company's net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 74. Also, Free cash flow numbers published by Equinix were 33.4, which was a 3.00% change from the previous filing. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 8.48%. The company's free cash flow metrics are especially strong compared to its peers. Management seems to balance cash flow management, asset growth, and resource allocations in general. Therefore, its free cash flow movement earned a score of 72. That said, one metric, Capital Expenditure, stood out as particularly concerning. Equinix's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were discouraging and reflected management's unbalanced growth strategy. Equinix recorded CapEx of 126.8M, which represents a -49.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more uninspiring relative to their peers and competitors. Therefore, their CapEx movement component earned a score of 41. Because the company's management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash flow was given a score of 61. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Equinix's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Equinix's stock appears overbought. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 73.
28,209	fundamental summary At a high level, the metrics from Equity Residential's Q1 financial report release provided many positive indicators. Their growth and value factors performance indicate that company management is focused on the right targets and executing well. We expect that this positive performance will continue in the coming months, and anticipate that Equity Residential will maintain good momentum even in a challenging environment. Therefore, they earned a total score of 85 out of 100 and a BUY recommendation. balance sheet Equity Residential appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Equity Residential did a great job related to cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 133.5M, representing a 148.00% change from the previous filing. This impressive growth, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. The company's cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 96. Also, Equity Residential assets on their balance sheet, moved to 20.1B, which is a -1.00% change from the last period. This performance is interesting in comparison to its peers and competitors. Consequently, their asset movement received a grade of 83. On the other hand, Equity, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Equity Residential management produced disappointing equity metrics this period, which stood at 11.1B, representing a -0.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 9.70%. This performance is significantly less impressive than its peers and competitors. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 77. Therefore, the company's balance sheet earned a grade of 91. income statement Equity Residential appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Equity Residential's management was effective in improving its EBIDTA, which now sits at 1.8B and represents a 2.00% change from the last reporting period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 5.72%. Its EBITDA metrics highlight an impressive overall financial performance, which is expected to continue moving forward. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 85. Also, In this filing, Equity Residential reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 8.2, which represents a change of 19.00%. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. The company's return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 68. On the other hand, Revenue Efficiency, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Equity Residential management did an underwhelming job managing revenue efficiency this past period. Equity Residential's revenue efficiency is 2.8B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 2.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 2.87% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', isn't encouraging. Its revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 66. Therefore, their income statement earned a grade of 76. cash flow Overall, Equity Residential's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Equity Residential's management was effective in improving its CapEx, which now sits at -3.7M and represents 9.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. The company's CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 85. Also, Equity Residential's management was effective in improving their net cash flow, which now sits at 107.4M and represents a 148.00% change from the previous report. Their net cash flow metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. The company's net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 79. However, one discouraging result, Asset Turnover, stood out. Equity Residential's asset turnover numbers were discouraging, reflecting significant concerns related to management's ability to leverage assets to generate sales effectively and efficiently. Equity Residential recorded asset turnover of 0.1, which represents a 3.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 8.43% percent by this parameter. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly less impressive when compared to their peers and competitors. Therefore, their asset turnover movement earned a score of 46. Because their management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash_flow was given a score of 66. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Equity Residential's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Equity Residential's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 78.
28,606	fundamental summary Looking at FMC's financials of Q1 reflected decent results. This typically translates into the stock performing on par with market performance for the upcoming quarter. Overall, FMC's value and growth factors are trending positively, and we, therefore, give FMC an overall grade of 71 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Two main balance sheet metrics are driving the positive outlook for FMC's financial strength going forward. FMC produced great equity metrics for this filing, demonstrating management's skill in increasing shareholder value. FMC's equity was reported as 3.5B, which represents a 3.00% change from the last report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 5.04% percent by this parameter. These equity changes appear exceptionally balanced and impressive objectively compared to their peers. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 86. Also, FMC's management was effective in managing the value of the assets on their balance sheet, which now sits at 11.7B and represents a 5.00% change from the previous report. This performance is interesting in comparison to its peers and competitors. Therefore, its asset component earned a score of 63. That said, one metric, Cash & Equivalents, stood out as strongly negative. FMC's management did a relatively poor job managing cash and cash equivalents, which now sit at 494.4M and represents a -14.00% change from the last reporting period. The company's cash and cash equivalents metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Its cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 54. Therefore, we scored its balance sheet a 72. income statement Overall, FMC's critical income statement metrics appear to strongly support positive growth going forward. FMC reported impressive EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 1.5B, representing 1.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 21.19%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 84. Also, FMC's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 24.9, representing a change of -3.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 76. That said, one metric, Revenue Efficiency, stood out as particularly concerning. FMC's revenue efficiency metrics look especially concerning this period, highlighting issues management is having controlling and reducing expenses while increasing earnings. This metric might have a 26.10% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency does not make a compelling case for upward pressure on the company's stock price. Its revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 66. Therefore, their income statement earned a grade of 74. cash flow Results from FMC's current financials were concerning, in two areas in particular: Free Cash flow and Net Cash Flow. Free cash flow numbers published by FMC were 1.6, which was a -56.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 4.15%. Their free cash flow situation is more concerning relative to their peers and competitors. Disappointing results in free cash flow often lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated their free cash flow with a score of 46. Also, FMC's management was not successful in meaningfully improving their cash flow metrics. As of the current filing, they were reported as 129.3M and represented a 134.00% change from the previous period. As demonstrated by these concerning net cash flow metrics, their priorities seem to be headed in the wrong direction. Hence, their net cash flow earned a score of 52. That said, one metric, Capital Expenditure, stood out as strongly positive. FMC's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. FMC recorded CapEx of -138.9M, which represents 2.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Consequently, their CapEx movement received a grade of 77. Consequently, their cash flow earned a rank of 59. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. FMC's stock is now priced above its 5-day, but below its 50-day and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), FMC's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 42.
28,703	fundamental summary Franklin published its Q1 report on May 01, 2023 with positive results, but no significant factors particularly remarkable relative to its peers. This typically translates into the stock performing on par with market performance for the upcoming quarter. Therefore, they earned a total score of 64 out of 100 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the balance sheet strength in Franklin's recent report: Assets and Liabilities. Franklin's management was effective in managing the value of the assets on their balance sheet, which now sits at 29.1B and represents a -1.00% change from the previous report. This growth should support upward pressure on its's stock price, which better captures their intrinsic value. Therefore, its asset component earned a score of 82. Also, Franklin has done an excellent job managing its liabilities. Franklin's liabilities stood at 15.7B in the current filing, which represents a 6.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all interesting relative to their peers and suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect a higher intrinsic value. These results statistically lead to positive movement in stock prices, so we rated its liabilities movement component 75. On the other hand, Equity, jumped out as looking problematic. Franklin management produced disappointing equity metrics this period, which stood at 11.8B, representing a 1.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 6.45%. These metrics are all the more disappointing relative to their peers and should blunt potential positive momentum in its's stock price. Its equity movement component, therefore, received a grade of 51. The company's balance sheet received an overall score of 65. income statement Franklin appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Franklin reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 7.00%. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', should support a positive movement in the company's stock price. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 89. Also, Franklin's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 7.0, representing a change of 1.00%. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 72. On the other hand, EBITDA, jumped out as looking problematic. Franklin reported concerning EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 2.3B, representing -6.00% change from the previous period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 11.80%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more problematic when compared to their peers. Therefore, their EBITDA component earned a score of 51. As the companie's management is doing an excellent job managing the critical metrics, the income statement was given a score of 67. cash flow Overall, Franklin's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Franklin's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. Franklin recorded CapEx of -90.6M, which represents 10.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Therefore, its CapEx movement component earned a score of 87. Also, Franklin presents exciting net cash flow numbers for its recent financial release, illustrated by a net cash flow of -736.1M, which is a change of -1648.00% from the last filing. The company is headed in the right direction regarding business priorities, exhibiting prudent net cash flow management and growth. Consequently, their net cash flow movement received a grade of 72. On the other hand, Asset Turnover, jumped out as looking problematic. Asset turnover metrics during this period were surprisingly weak. Their reported asset turnover metrics of 0.3, which represents a -3.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 4.53% percent by this parameter. The company's asset turnover metrics seem especially problematic relative to their peers. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 45. The company's cash flow received an overall score of 62. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Franklin's stock is now priced above its 5-day and 50-day, but below its 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in both the short and medium-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Franklin's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 68.
28,756	fundamental summary Looking at FLEETCOR's financials of Q1 reflected unimpressive, mediocre results. Its growth, value, and income factors all individually appear positive and give support for optimism regarding the likelihood of continued positive performance. We therefore gave FLEETCOR a total score of 72 out of 100 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Two main balance sheet metrics are driving the positive outlook for FLEETCOR's financial strength going forward. FLEETCOR publishes solid book value factor metrics in this report. Price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 6.0 and represents a 13.00% change from the previous report. The company's book value factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. Therefore, its book value factors earned a score of 93. Also, In terms of liabilities, FLEETCOR published good numbers. Their reported liabilities were 11.7B, representing a 1.00% change from the previous report. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing liabilities, especially relative to their peers. These results statistically lead to positive movement in stock prices, so we rated its liabilities movement component 70. That said, one metric, Equity, stood out as strongly negative. FLEETCOR management produced disappointing equity metrics this period, which stood at 2.9B, representing a 13.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 6.45%. These metrics are all the more disappointing relative to their peers and should blunt potential positive momentum in its's stock price. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 45. Therefore, the company's balance sheet earned a grade of 78. income statement FLEETCOR's income statement showed strong financials, specifically EBITDA and Revenue Efficiency. FLEETCOR reported impressive EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 1.8B, representing 4.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 11.80%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its EBITDA component earned a score of 74. Also, FLEETCOR reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 7.00%. Their impressive revenue efficiency is even more impressive relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. As a result, its revenue efficiency earned a score of 63. On the other hand, Return Factors, jumped out as looking problematic. FLEETCOR's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 32.9, representing a change of -7.00%. This metric might have a 14.26% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. They does not yet appear to be headed in the right direction regarding these return on equity and return on assets metrics. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 55. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the income statement was given a score of 66. cash flow A few key cash flow metrics in this report were discouraging. FLEETCOR's asset turnover numbers were discouraging, reflecting significant concerns related to management's ability to leverage assets to generate sales effectively and efficiently. FLEETCOR recorded asset turnover of 0.2, which represents a -1.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 4.53% percent by this parameter. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly less impressive when compared to their peers and competitors. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 47. Also, FLEETCOR's management was ineffective in materially improving CapEx, which now sits at -156.8M and represents a -4.00% change from the previous report. They appears to be headed in the wrong direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Consequently, their CapEx movement received a grade of 59. At the same time, one {cash_flow} metric, Free Cash flow, was actually strongly positive. Free cash flow numbers published by FLEETCOR were 13.9, which was a 74.00% change from the previous filing. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.09%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. The company's free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 91. Because of these weaknesses, the company's cash flow received an overall score of 59. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. FLEETCOR's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), FLEETCOR's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 78.
29,002	fundamental summary Looking at Gilead Sciences's financials of Q1 reflected unimpressive, mediocre results. Their growth and value factors performance indicate that company management is having trouble hitting the right targets or executing. We therefore gave Gilead Sciences a total score of 61 out of 100 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Liabilities and Equity stood out as the most significant drivers of Gilead Sciences's balance sheet strength. In terms of liabilities, Gilead Sciences published good numbers. Their reported liabilities were 40.9B, representing a -2.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all interesting relative to their peers and suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect a higher intrinsic value. These results statistically lead to positive movement in stock prices, so we rated its liabilities movement component 68. Also, Gilead Sciences produced great equity metrics for this filing, demonstrating management's skill in increasing shareholder value. Gilead Sciences's equity was reported as 21.0B, which represents a -1.00% change from the last report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 9.65%. These equity changes appear exceptionally balanced and impressive objectively compared to their peers. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 64. On the other hand, Book Value Factors, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Gilead Sciences publishes discouraging results related to book value factors in this report. As of the current filing, price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 4.7, representing a -7.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 16.77%. The company's book value factors were lackluster and showed that management hasn't figured out how to overperform expectations. Consequently, their book value factors movement received a grade of 58. Consequently, the company's balance sheet earned a rank of 63. income statement Gilead Sciences appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Gilead Sciences did an excellent job managing its revenue efficiency this past period. Gilead Sciences's revenue efficiency is 27.0B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a -1.00% change from the previous report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 15.78%. Their impressive revenue efficiency is even more impressive relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 84. Also, In this filing, Gilead Sciences reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 27.1, which represents a change of 26.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 75. On the other hand, EBITDA, jumped out as looking problematic. Gilead Sciences reported concerning EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 12.6B, representing -5.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 30.38% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their EBITDA metrics are even more problematic when compared to their peers. Therefore, their EBITDA component earned a score of 59. Consequently, their income statement earned a rank of 67. cash flow Two main cash flow metrics, Capital Expenditure and Asset Turnover, are driving the positive outlook for Gilead Sciences's financial strength. Gilead Sciences's management did a great job this period managing its capital expenditure (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -590.0M, which represents a 19.00% change from the last period. The company appears to be headed in the right direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Consequently, their CapEx movement received a grade of 89. Also, Gilead Sciences is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.4, representing a 4.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 2.11% percent by this parameter. Their impressive asset turnover metrics, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support a tailwind in the company's stock price. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 81. On the other hand, Net Cash Flow, jumped out as looking problematic. Gilead Sciences's net cash flow metrics were 640.0M according to their current filing, which represents a 765.00% change from the previous report. As demonstrated by these concerning net cash flow metrics, their priorities seem to be headed in the wrong direction. Its net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 58. Their cash flow, therefore, earned a score of 70. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Gilead Sciences's stock is now priced above its 5-day, but below its 50-day and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Gilead Sciences's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 52.
29,002	fundamental summary Looking at Gilead Sciences's financials of Q1 reflected unimpressive, mediocre results. Their growth and value factors performance indicate that company management is having trouble hitting the right targets or executing. We therefore gave Gilead Sciences a total score of 61 out of 100 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Liabilities and Equity stood out as the most significant drivers of Gilead Sciences's balance sheet strength. In terms of liabilities, Gilead Sciences published good numbers. Their reported liabilities were 40.9B, representing a -2.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all interesting relative to their peers and suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect a higher intrinsic value. These results statistically lead to positive movement in stock prices, so we rated its liabilities movement component 68. Also, Gilead Sciences produced great equity metrics for this filing, demonstrating management's skill in increasing shareholder value. Gilead Sciences's equity was reported as 21.0B, which represents a -1.00% change from the last report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 9.65%. These equity changes appear exceptionally balanced and impressive objectively compared to their peers. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 64. On the other hand, Book Value Factors, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Gilead Sciences publishes discouraging results related to book value factors in this report. As of the current filing, price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 4.7, representing a -7.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 16.77%. The company's book value factors were lackluster and showed that management hasn't figured out how to overperform expectations. Consequently, their book value factors movement received a grade of 58. Consequently, the company's balance sheet earned a rank of 63. income statement Gilead Sciences appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Gilead Sciences did an excellent job managing its revenue efficiency this past period. Gilead Sciences's revenue efficiency is 27.0B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a -1.00% change from the previous report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 15.78%. Their impressive revenue efficiency is even more impressive relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 84. Also, In this filing, Gilead Sciences reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 27.1, which represents a change of 26.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 75. On the other hand, EBITDA, jumped out as looking problematic. Gilead Sciences reported concerning EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 12.6B, representing -5.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 30.38% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their EBITDA metrics are even more problematic when compared to their peers. Therefore, their EBITDA component earned a score of 59. Consequently, their income statement earned a rank of 67. cash flow Two main cash flow metrics, Capital Expenditure and Asset Turnover, are driving the positive outlook for Gilead Sciences's financial strength. Gilead Sciences's management did a great job this period managing its capital expenditure (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -590.0M, which represents a 19.00% change from the last period. The company appears to be headed in the right direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Consequently, their CapEx movement received a grade of 89. Also, Gilead Sciences is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.4, representing a 4.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 2.11% percent by this parameter. Their impressive asset turnover metrics, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support a tailwind in the company's stock price. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 81. On the other hand, Net Cash Flow, jumped out as looking problematic. Gilead Sciences's net cash flow metrics were 640.0M according to their current filing, which represents a 765.00% change from the previous report. As demonstrated by these concerning net cash flow metrics, their priorities seem to be headed in the wrong direction. Its net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 58. Their cash flow, therefore, earned a score of 70. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Gilead Sciences's stock is now priced above its 5-day, but below its 50-day and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Gilead Sciences's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 52.
29,096	fundamental summary Alphabet's financial results from Q1 demonstrated decent performance, but will likely only help Alphabet remain on par with its peers. We do believe, though, that macro-related market conditions will influence its performance more significantly than its individual results. We gave Alphabet a 72 rating and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Alphabet's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Alphabet publishes impressive results related to book value factors in this report. Specifically, price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 6.0 and represents a 34.00% change from the previous report. Their industry-leading book value factors momentum reinforces an expectation for future positive momentum for their stock price going forward. Therefore, its book value factors earned a score of 88. Also, Alphabet did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 260.9B, representing a 2.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 7.63%. These equity changes appear exceptionally balanced and impressive objectively compared to their peers. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 87. That said, one metric, Assets, stood out as particularly concerning. Alphabet's management did not succeed in significantly improving the value of the assets on their balance sheet, which now sits at 369.5B and represents a 1.00% change from the previous report. This unimpressive metric is weaker than its peers and competitors. Its asset component, therefore, received a grade of 67. Similarly, because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 88. income statement Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the income statement's strength in Alphabet's recent report: Revenue Efficiency and Return Factors. Alphabet reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 11.83%. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', should support a positive movement in the company's stock price. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 69. Also, Return factors metrics and ratios were exceptional in this report. Alphabet reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 22.8, representing a change of -4.00% from the last report. The company appears headed in the right direction in terms of these return factors, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 65. On the other hand, EBITDA, jumped out as looking problematic. Alphabet reported concerning EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 90.4B, representing -4.00% change from the previous period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 17.24%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more problematic when compared to their peers. Its EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 60. Consequently, their income statement earned a rank of 63. cash flow Alphabet appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Alphabet's management did a great job this period managing its capital expenditure (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -28.0B, which represents a 11.00% change from the last period. This performance is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. The company's CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 87. Also, Free cash flow numbers published by Alphabet were 4.8, which was a 4.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 2.18%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Consequently, their free cash flow movement received a grade of 72. On the other hand, Net Cash Flow, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Alphabet's produced underwhelming cash flow numbers in this filing. Net cash flow was reported as 5.0B, which is a 439.00% change from the last report. As demonstrated by these concerning net cash flow metrics, their priorities seem to be headed in the wrong direction. Hence, their net cash flow earned a score of 61. Therefore, the company's cash flow earned a grade of 67. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Alphabet's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Alphabet's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 73.
29,096	fundamental summary Alphabet's financial results from Q1 demonstrated decent performance, but will likely only help Alphabet remain on par with its peers. We do believe, though, that macro-related market conditions will influence its performance more significantly than its individual results. We gave Alphabet a 72 rating and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Alphabet's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Alphabet publishes impressive results related to book value factors in this report. Specifically, price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 6.0 and represents a 34.00% change from the previous report. Their industry-leading book value factors momentum reinforces an expectation for future positive momentum for their stock price going forward. Therefore, its book value factors earned a score of 88. Also, Alphabet did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 260.9B, representing a 2.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 7.63%. These equity changes appear exceptionally balanced and impressive objectively compared to their peers. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 87. That said, one metric, Assets, stood out as particularly concerning. Alphabet's management did not succeed in significantly improving the value of the assets on their balance sheet, which now sits at 369.5B and represents a 1.00% change from the previous report. This unimpressive metric is weaker than its peers and competitors. Its asset component, therefore, received a grade of 67. Similarly, because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 88. income statement Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the income statement's strength in Alphabet's recent report: Revenue Efficiency and Return Factors. Alphabet reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 11.83%. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', should support a positive movement in the company's stock price. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 69. Also, Return factors metrics and ratios were exceptional in this report. Alphabet reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 22.8, representing a change of -4.00% from the last report. The company appears headed in the right direction in terms of these return factors, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 65. On the other hand, EBITDA, jumped out as looking problematic. Alphabet reported concerning EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 90.4B, representing -4.00% change from the previous period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 17.24%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more problematic when compared to their peers. Its EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 60. Consequently, their income statement earned a rank of 63. cash flow Alphabet appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Alphabet's management did a great job this period managing its capital expenditure (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -28.0B, which represents a 11.00% change from the last period. This performance is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. The company's CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 87. Also, Free cash flow numbers published by Alphabet were 4.8, which was a 4.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 2.18%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Consequently, their free cash flow movement received a grade of 72. On the other hand, Net Cash Flow, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Alphabet's produced underwhelming cash flow numbers in this filing. Net cash flow was reported as 5.0B, which is a 439.00% change from the last report. As demonstrated by these concerning net cash flow metrics, their priorities seem to be headed in the wrong direction. Hence, their net cash flow earned a score of 61. Therefore, the company's cash flow earned a grade of 67. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Alphabet's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Alphabet's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 73.
29,096	fundamental summary Alphabet's financial results from Q1 demonstrated decent performance, but will likely only help Alphabet remain on par with its peers. We do believe, though, that macro-related market conditions will influence its performance more significantly than its individual results. We gave Alphabet a 72 rating and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Alphabet's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Alphabet publishes impressive results related to book value factors in this report. Specifically, price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 6.0 and represents a 34.00% change from the previous report. Their industry-leading book value factors momentum reinforces an expectation for future positive momentum for their stock price going forward. Therefore, its book value factors earned a score of 88. Also, Alphabet did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 260.9B, representing a 2.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 7.63%. These equity changes appear exceptionally balanced and impressive objectively compared to their peers. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 87. That said, one metric, Assets, stood out as particularly concerning. Alphabet's management did not succeed in significantly improving the value of the assets on their balance sheet, which now sits at 369.5B and represents a 1.00% change from the previous report. This unimpressive metric is weaker than its peers and competitors. Its asset component, therefore, received a grade of 67. Similarly, because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 88. income statement Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the income statement's strength in Alphabet's recent report: Revenue Efficiency and Return Factors. Alphabet reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 11.83%. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', should support a positive movement in the company's stock price. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 69. Also, Return factors metrics and ratios were exceptional in this report. Alphabet reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 22.8, representing a change of -4.00% from the last report. The company appears headed in the right direction in terms of these return factors, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 65. On the other hand, EBITDA, jumped out as looking problematic. Alphabet reported concerning EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 90.4B, representing -4.00% change from the previous period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 17.24%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more problematic when compared to their peers. Its EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 60. Consequently, their income statement earned a rank of 63. cash flow Alphabet appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Alphabet's management did a great job this period managing its capital expenditure (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -28.0B, which represents a 11.00% change from the last period. This performance is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. The company's CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 87. Also, Free cash flow numbers published by Alphabet were 4.8, which was a 4.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 2.18%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Consequently, their free cash flow movement received a grade of 72. On the other hand, Net Cash Flow, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Alphabet's produced underwhelming cash flow numbers in this filing. Net cash flow was reported as 5.0B, which is a 439.00% change from the last report. As demonstrated by these concerning net cash flow metrics, their priorities seem to be headed in the wrong direction. Hence, their net cash flow earned a score of 61. Therefore, the company's cash flow earned a grade of 67. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Alphabet's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Alphabet's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 73.
29,096	fundamental summary Alphabet's financial results from Q1 demonstrated decent performance, but will likely only help Alphabet remain on par with its peers. We do believe, though, that macro-related market conditions will influence its performance more significantly than its individual results. We gave Alphabet a 72 rating and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Alphabet's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Alphabet publishes impressive results related to book value factors in this report. Specifically, price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 6.0 and represents a 34.00% change from the previous report. Their industry-leading book value factors momentum reinforces an expectation for future positive momentum for their stock price going forward. Therefore, its book value factors earned a score of 88. Also, Alphabet did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 260.9B, representing a 2.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 7.63%. These equity changes appear exceptionally balanced and impressive objectively compared to their peers. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 87. That said, one metric, Assets, stood out as particularly concerning. Alphabet's management did not succeed in significantly improving the value of the assets on their balance sheet, which now sits at 369.5B and represents a 1.00% change from the previous report. This unimpressive metric is weaker than its peers and competitors. Its asset component, therefore, received a grade of 67. Similarly, because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 88. income statement Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the income statement's strength in Alphabet's recent report: Revenue Efficiency and Return Factors. Alphabet reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 11.83%. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', should support a positive movement in the company's stock price. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 69. Also, Return factors metrics and ratios were exceptional in this report. Alphabet reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 22.8, representing a change of -4.00% from the last report. The company appears headed in the right direction in terms of these return factors, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 65. On the other hand, EBITDA, jumped out as looking problematic. Alphabet reported concerning EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 90.4B, representing -4.00% change from the previous period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 17.24%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more problematic when compared to their peers. Its EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 60. Consequently, their income statement earned a rank of 63. cash flow Alphabet appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Alphabet's management did a great job this period managing its capital expenditure (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -28.0B, which represents a 11.00% change from the last period. This performance is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. The company's CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 87. Also, Free cash flow numbers published by Alphabet were 4.8, which was a 4.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 2.18%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Consequently, their free cash flow movement received a grade of 72. On the other hand, Net Cash Flow, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Alphabet's produced underwhelming cash flow numbers in this filing. Net cash flow was reported as 5.0B, which is a 439.00% change from the last report. As demonstrated by these concerning net cash flow metrics, their priorities seem to be headed in the wrong direction. Hence, their net cash flow earned a score of 61. Therefore, the company's cash flow earned a grade of 67. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Alphabet's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Alphabet's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 73.
29,470	fundamental summary The financials published by Hilton Worldwide for Q1 were weak and discouraging. Their growth, value, and income factors performance indicate that company management are not executing well their business plan. These results suggest a challenging future for Hilton Worldwide's stock. Therefore, Hilton Worldwide earned a score of 54 and a UNDERPERFORM recommendation. balance sheet Hilton Worldwide's recently published balance sheet showed overall, underwhelming numbers. Both Cash & Equivalents and Book Value Factors were particularly concerning. Hilton Worldwide did a poor job related to managing cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 901.0M, representing a -25.00% change from the previous filing. Their anemic growth in cash and cash equivalents, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should hurt their stock price. Consequently, their cash and cash equivalents movement received a grade of 47. Also, Hilton Worldwide publishes concerning book value factor metrics in this report. price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at -26.5 and represents 13.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 13.41%. The company's book value factors were lackluster and showed that management hasn't figured out how to overperform expectations. Disappointing results in book value factors typically precede negative pressure in stock prices, so its book value factors received a grade of 56. However, we can draw some encouragement from Hilton Worldwide's momentum in Liabilities generation. Hilton Worldwide is doing a good job of keeping its liabilities under control and growing intelligently. At filing, their liabilities were 16.6B, representing 0.00% change from the previous period. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing liabilities, especially relative to their peers. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 69. Therefore, it received a cautionary score of 53. income statement Hilton Worldwide appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Return factors metrics and ratios were exceptional in this report. Hilton Worldwide reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of -119.0, representing a change of 9.00% from the last report. The company appears headed in the right direction in terms of these return factors, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 80. Also, Hilton Worldwide reported impressive EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 2.5B, representing 5.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 18.90%. Its EBITDA metrics highlight an impressive overall financial performance, which is expected to continue moving forward. Therefore, its EBITDA component earned a score of 75. At the same time, one critical income statement metric, Revenue Efficiency, was notably weak. Hilton Worldwide reported discouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. As of the current filing, they were reported as 4.0B and represented 7.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 19.36% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Its uninspiring revenue efficiency is even more concerning relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. Its revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 46. Therefore, it received a score of 63. cash flow Hilton Worldwide's recently published cash flow conveys disappointing growth, particularly with respect to Capital Expenditure and Asset Turnover. metrics. Hilton Worldwide's management did not a remarkable job this period managing capital expenditures (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -79.0M, which represents a -103.00% change from the last period. This performance is all the more uninspiring relative to their peers and competitors. Consequently, their CapEx movement received a grade of 38. Also, Hilton Worldwide's asset turnover metrics were concerning and highlighted potential issues management is having effectively turning assets into sales efficiently. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.3, representing a 8.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 1.59%. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly less impressive when compared to their peers and competitors. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 44. That said, one metric, Free Cash flow, stood out as strongly positive. Hilton Worldwide did a great job related to free cash flow this period, which stood at 6.1, representing a 7.00% change from the previous filing. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.71%. The company's free cash flow metrics are especially strong compared to its peers. Management seems to balance cash flow management, asset growth, and resource allocations in general. Therefore, its free cash flow movement earned a score of 69. Because of these weaknesses, the company's cash flow received an overall score of 53. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Hilton Worldwide's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Hilton Worldwide's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal negative momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 57.
29,574	fundamental summary Looking at Host Hotels & Resorts's financials of Q1 reflected decent results. The company's growth and value factors appear positive and give support for optimism regarding the likelihood of continued positive performance. Overall, Host Hotels & Resorts's value and growth factors are trending positively, and we, therefore, give Host Hotels & Resorts an overall grade of 78 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Host Hotels & Resorts appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. In terms of liabilities, Host Hotels & Resorts published good numbers. Their reported liabilities were 5.2B, representing a -4.00% change from the previous report. These liabilities changes appear balanced compared to their peers and project the message that management is capable and focused on balancing asset growth, resource allocation, and growing liabilities. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 90. Also, Host Hotels & Resorts's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 1.8 and represents 4.00% change from the previous report. These book value factor numbers show that management has been prudent in focusing on efficient growth. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its book value factors earned a score of 85. However, one discouraging result, Cash & Equivalents, stood out. Host Hotels & Resorts's management did a relatively poor job managing cash and cash equivalents, which now sit at 563.0M and represents a -16.00% change from the last reporting period. Their anemic growth in cash and cash equivalents, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should hurt their stock price. Its cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 56. Therefore, it received a score of 80. income statement Host Hotels & Resorts appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics, especially EBITDA and Revenue Efficiency. Host Hotels & Resorts's management did a remarkable job this period managing its EBITDA. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 1.6B, which represents a 9.00% change from the last period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 5.72%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 90. Also, Host Hotels & Resorts's financials reveal an interesting trend for their revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.87%. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', should support a positive movement in the company's stock price. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 87. On the other hand, Return Factors, jumped out as looking problematic. Host Hotels & Resorts's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 11.9, representing a change of 24.00%. This metric might have a 1.37% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. They does not yet appear to be headed in the right direction regarding these return on equity and return on assets metrics. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 73. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the income statement was given a score of 87. cash flow Overall, Host Hotels & Resorts's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Host Hotels & Resorts's strong net cash flow numbers, which were 340.0M in this filing, showed a 530.00% change from the last period. The company is headed in the right direction regarding business priorities, exhibiting prudent net cash flow management and growth. Consequently, their net cash flow movement received a grade of 78. Also, Host Hotels & Resorts did a great job related to free cash flow this period, which stood at 2.0, representing a 3.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 8.48%. The company's free cash flow metrics are especially strong compared to its peers. Management seems to balance cash flow management, asset growth, and resource allocations in general. The company's free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 73. At the same time, one critical cash flow metric, Capital Expenditure, was notably weak. Host Hotels & Resorts's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were discouraging and reflected management's unbalanced growth strategy. Host Hotels & Resorts recorded CapEx of 197.0M, which represents a -17.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more uninspiring relative to their peers and competitors. Its CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 46. Therefore, we scored its cash flow a 63. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Host Hotels & Resorts's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Host Hotels & Resorts's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 78.
29,618	fundamental summary Humana's financial reports for Q1 showed some exciting results. Their balanced results conveyed remarkable strength in terms of value, growth, and income factors. These results indicate a strong growth potential for Humana's stock's price moving forward. Correspondingly, Humana received a ranking of 94 and a S.BUY recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Humana's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Humana's management was effective in improving its cash and cash equivalents metrics, which now sit at 13.7B. This represents 171.00% change from the last reporting period. Its impressive cash and cash equivalents metrics should support upward pressure on its's stock price. The company's cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 97. Also, Humana reported solid equity numbers this period. At filing, equity was reported as 16.6B, representing 8.00% change from the previous period. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 9.65%. These equity changes appear exceptionally balanced and impressive objectively compared to their peers. The company's equity movement component, therefore, received a grade of 92. However, one discouraging result, Liabilities, stood out. In terms of liabilities, Humana published uninspiring results. Their reported liabilities were 38.1B, representing a 38.00% change from the previous report. Humana's liabilities changes appear mediocre compared to their peers. Contextually, they convey that management finds balancing asset growth, resource allocation, and liabilities challenging. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 74. Their balance sheet received an overall score of 96. income statement Overall, Humana's critical income statement metrics appear to strongly support positive growth going forward. Humana reported impressive EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 5.3B, representing 9.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 30.38%. Its EBITDA metrics highlight an impressive overall financial performance, which is expected to continue moving forward. Consequently, their EBITDA movement received a grade of 85. Also, In this filing, Humana reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 19.4, which represents a change of 9.00%. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 77. That said, one metric, Revenue Efficiency, stood out as particularly concerning. Humana's revenue efficiency metrics look especially concerning this period, highlighting issues management is having controlling and reducing expenses while increasing earnings. This metric might have a 15.78% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', isn't encouraging. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 61. Therefore, we scored its income statement a 82. cash flow Humana appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Free cash flow numbers published by Humana were 78.8, which was a 187.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 0.97%. These free cash flow numbers show that management has executed well while generating cash flow and encouraging growth. Therefore, its free cash flow movement earned a score of 97. Also, Humana's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. Humana recorded CapEx of -1.0B, which represents 6.00% change from the previous report. The company appears to be headed in the right direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Consequently, their CapEx movement received a grade of 79. That said, one metric, Asset Turnover, stood out as particularly concerning. Asset turnover metrics during this period were surprisingly weak. Their reported asset turnover metrics of 1.9, which represents a -11.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 2.11% percent by this parameter. Their lackluster asset turnover metrics, specifically in contrast to leading industry peers' performance, could present significant headwinds. Underwhelming results in asset turnover metrics often lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated its asset turnover momentum 57. Therefore, we scored their cash flow a 80. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Humana's stock is now priced above its 200-day, but below its 5-day and 50-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the long-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Humana's stock appears overbought. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 42.
29,726	fundamental summary Biogen's financial results from Q1 demonstrated decent performance, but will likely only help Biogen remain on par with its peers. This typically translates into the stock performing on par with market performance for the upcoming quarter. Overall, Biogen's growth, value, and income factors are trending positively, and we, therefore, give Biogen an overall grade of 74 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Biogen's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Biogen's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 3.1 and represents 5.00% change from the previous report. These book value factor numbers show that management has been prudent in focusing on efficient growth. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. The company's book value factors component, therefore, received a grade of 77. Also, The company's assets section could set high expectations for Biogen's future attractiveness, as they went to 24.6B, which is a 0.00% change from the last period. This performance is interesting in comparison to its peers and competitors. Consequently, their asset movement received a grade of 70. On the other hand, Cash & Equivalents, jumped out as looking problematic. Biogen's management did a relatively poor job managing cash and cash equivalents, which now sit at 2.9B and represents a -15.00% change from the last reporting period. Their anemic growth in cash and cash equivalents, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should hurt their stock price. Consequently, their cash and cash equivalents movement received a grade of 53. Consequently, their balance sheet earned a rank of 73. income statement Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the income statement's strength in Biogen's recent report: Revenue Efficiency and Return Factors. Biogen did an excellent job managing its revenue efficiency this past period. Biogen's revenue efficiency is 10.1B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a -1.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 15.78%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 83. Also, In this filing, Biogen reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 25.0, which represents a change of 3.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 73. However, one discouraging result, EBITDA, stood out. Biogen reported concerning EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 3.5B, representing -4.00% change from the previous period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 30.38%. Biogen appears to be headed in the wrong direction in terms of EBITDA momentum, likely due to insufficient capital controls and a weaker than expected overall financial performance. Discouraging results like these statistically lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated their EBITDA a grade of 61. Consequently, their income statement earned a rank of 69. cash flow Overall, Biogen's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Biogen's management was effective in improving their net cash flow, which now sits at 1.1B and represents a -1.00% change from the previous report. Their net cash flow metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. Hence, its net cash flow earned a score of 85. Also, Biogen did a great job related to free cash flow this period, which stood at 9.8, representing a 25.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 0.97%. These free cash flow numbers show that management has executed well while generating cash flow and encouraging growth. Consequently, their free cash flow movement received a grade of 85. On the other hand, Asset Turnover, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Biogen's asset turnover metrics were concerning and highlighted potential issues management is having effectively turning assets into sales efficiently. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.4, representing a -0.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 2.11%. The company's asset turnover metrics seem especially problematic relative to their peers. Therefore, their asset turnover movement earned a score of 60. Their cash flow received an overall score of 83. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Biogen's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Biogen's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 83.
29,726	fundamental summary Biogen's financial results from Q1 demonstrated decent performance, but will likely only help Biogen remain on par with its peers. This typically translates into the stock performing on par with market performance for the upcoming quarter. Overall, Biogen's growth, value, and income factors are trending positively, and we, therefore, give Biogen an overall grade of 74 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Biogen's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Biogen's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 3.1 and represents 5.00% change from the previous report. These book value factor numbers show that management has been prudent in focusing on efficient growth. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. The company's book value factors component, therefore, received a grade of 77. Also, The company's assets section could set high expectations for Biogen's future attractiveness, as they went to 24.6B, which is a 0.00% change from the last period. This performance is interesting in comparison to its peers and competitors. Consequently, their asset movement received a grade of 70. On the other hand, Cash & Equivalents, jumped out as looking problematic. Biogen's management did a relatively poor job managing cash and cash equivalents, which now sit at 2.9B and represents a -15.00% change from the last reporting period. Their anemic growth in cash and cash equivalents, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should hurt their stock price. Consequently, their cash and cash equivalents movement received a grade of 53. Consequently, their balance sheet earned a rank of 73. income statement Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the income statement's strength in Biogen's recent report: Revenue Efficiency and Return Factors. Biogen did an excellent job managing its revenue efficiency this past period. Biogen's revenue efficiency is 10.1B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a -1.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 15.78%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 83. Also, In this filing, Biogen reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 25.0, which represents a change of 3.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 73. However, one discouraging result, EBITDA, stood out. Biogen reported concerning EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 3.5B, representing -4.00% change from the previous period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 30.38%. Biogen appears to be headed in the wrong direction in terms of EBITDA momentum, likely due to insufficient capital controls and a weaker than expected overall financial performance. Discouraging results like these statistically lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated their EBITDA a grade of 61. Consequently, their income statement earned a rank of 69. cash flow Overall, Biogen's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Biogen's management was effective in improving their net cash flow, which now sits at 1.1B and represents a -1.00% change from the previous report. Their net cash flow metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. Hence, its net cash flow earned a score of 85. Also, Biogen did a great job related to free cash flow this period, which stood at 9.8, representing a 25.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 0.97%. These free cash flow numbers show that management has executed well while generating cash flow and encouraging growth. Consequently, their free cash flow movement received a grade of 85. On the other hand, Asset Turnover, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Biogen's asset turnover metrics were concerning and highlighted potential issues management is having effectively turning assets into sales efficiently. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.4, representing a -0.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 2.11%. The company's asset turnover metrics seem especially problematic relative to their peers. Therefore, their asset turnover movement earned a score of 60. Their cash flow received an overall score of 83. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Biogen's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Biogen's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 83.
29,728	fundamental summary Looking at IDEX's financials of Q1 reflected unimpressive, mediocre results. It is highly likely that it will be mostly tethered to market performance and sector movements for the near term. As such, IDEX received an overall score of 72 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet IDEX appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. IDEX did a great job related to cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 510.7M, representing a 19.00% change from the previous filing. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. It suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect its actual intrinsic value. The company's cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 86. Also, IDEX publishes solid book value factor metrics in this report. Price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 4.9 and represents a -13.00% change from the previous report. These book value factor numbers show that management has been prudent in focusing on efficient growth. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its book value factors earned a score of 77. On the other hand, Liabilities, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. At filing, IDEX's liabilities were 2.4B, representing a -2.00% change from the previous period. IDEX's liabilities changes appear mediocre compared to their peers. Contextually, they convey that management finds balancing asset growth, resource allocation, and liabilities challenging. Its liabilities movement component, therefore, received a grade of 63. Therefore, its balance sheet earned a grade of 79. income statement IDEX seems to be balancing strong EBITDA and Revenue Efficiency along with an overall impressive positive income statement. IDEX's management did a remarkable job this period managing its EBITDA. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 956.8M, which represents a 2.00% change from the last period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 9.69%. The company is headed in the right direction regarding EBITDA, exhibiting efficient capital controls and strong overall financial performance. Consequently, their EBITDA movement received a grade of 67. Also, IDEX reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 24.16%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 62. On the other hand, Return Factors, jumped out as looking problematic. In this filing, IDEX reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 19.1, which represents a growth of -5.00%. This metric might have a 22.64% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. The company's return factor metrics return on equity and return on assets are even more concerning when compared to their peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 61. Consequently, the companie's income statement earned a rank of 63. cash flow IDEX appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. IDEX is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.6, representing a 1.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 5.26% percent by this parameter. Their impressive asset turnover metrics, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support a tailwind in the company's stock price. Therefore, its asset turnover movement earned a score of 75. Also, IDEX's published free cash flow numbers were substantial and reflected management's focus on a healthy change strategy. IDEX recorded free cash flow of 7.2, which represents a 12.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 4.12%. These free cash flow numbers show that management has executed well while generating cash flow and encouraging growth. Consequently, their free cash flow movement received a grade of 72. That said, one metric, Capital Expenditure, stood out as strongly negative. IDEX's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were discouraging and reflected management's unbalanced growth strategy. IDEX recorded CapEx of -75.2M, which represents a -27.00% change from the previous report. The company's disappointing CapEx growth is expected to stunt the momentum they hoped for this period. Therefore, their CapEx movement component earned a score of 46. Because the company's management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash flow was given a score of 63. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. IDEX's stock is now priced above its 5-day, but below its 50-day and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), IDEX's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 42.
29,729	fundamental summary According to their recent financial report, which was published on May 02, 2023, IDEXX had several impressive financial metrics that should make them more attractive than their peers going forward. Specifically, their growth, value, and income factors indicate a well-planned and balanced effort, which is generating exciting growth. There should be significant upside potential for the stock looking forward. As such, IDEXX received an overall score of 82 and a BUY recommendation. balance sheet Overall, IDEXX's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. IDEXX's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 47.9 and represents -13.00% change from the previous report. Their industry-leading book value factors momentum reinforces an expectation for future positive momentum for their stock price going forward. Consequently, their book value factors movement received a grade of 75. Also, IDEXX assets on their balance sheet, moved to 2.8B, which is a 2.00% change from the last period. These results, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. Therefore, its asset component earned a score of 74. However, one discouraging result, Liabilities, stood out. In terms of liabilities, IDEXX published uninspiring results. Their reported liabilities were 2.0B, representing a -8.00% change from the previous report. IDEXX's liabilities changes appear mediocre compared to their peers. Contextually, they convey that management finds balancing asset growth, resource allocation, and liabilities challenging. Its liabilities movement component, therefore, received a grade of 68. The company's balance sheet received an overall score of 79. income statement IDEXX's income statement showed strong financials, specifically EBITDA and Revenue Efficiency. IDEXX's management did a remarkable job this period managing its EBITDA. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 1.1B, which represents a 3.00% change from the last period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 30.38%. Its EBITDA metrics highlight an impressive overall financial performance, which is expected to continue moving forward. Therefore, its EBITDA component earned a score of 78. Also, IDEXX's financials reveal an interesting trend for their revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 15.78%. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', should support a positive movement in the company's stock price. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 67. On the other hand, Return Factors, jumped out as looking problematic. In this filing, IDEXX reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 94.4, which represents a growth of -10.00%. This metric might have a 3.26% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. They does not yet appear to be headed in the right direction regarding these return on equity and return on assets metrics. Therefore, their return factors component earned a score of 63. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the income statement was given a score of 76. cash flow Overall, IDEXX's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. IDEXX presents exciting net cash flow numbers for its recent financial release, illustrated by a net cash flow of -93.3M, which is a change of -192.00% from the last filing. The company is headed in the right direction regarding business priorities, exhibiting prudent net cash flow management and growth. Hence, its net cash flow earned a score of 88. Also, IDEXX's published free cash flow numbers were substantial and reflected management's focus on a healthy change strategy. IDEXX recorded free cash flow of 5.5, which represents a 19.00% change from the previous report. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 0.97%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. The company's free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 82. That said, one metric, Asset Turnover, stood out as particularly concerning. IDEXX's asset turnover numbers were discouraging, reflecting significant concerns related to management's ability to leverage assets to generate sales effectively and efficiently. IDEXX recorded asset turnover of 1.3, which represents a -2.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 2.11% percent by this parameter. The company's asset turnover metrics seem especially problematic relative to their peers. Underwhelming results in asset turnover metrics often lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated its asset turnover momentum 53. Their cash flow received an overall score of 84. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. IDEXX's stock is now priced above its 200-day, but below its 5-day and 50-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the long-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), IDEXX's stock appears overbought. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 47.
29,729	fundamental summary According to their recent financial report, which was published on May 02, 2023, IDEXX had several impressive financial metrics that should make them more attractive than their peers going forward. Specifically, their growth, value, and income factors indicate a well-planned and balanced effort, which is generating exciting growth. There should be significant upside potential for the stock looking forward. As such, IDEXX received an overall score of 82 and a BUY recommendation. balance sheet Overall, IDEXX's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. IDEXX's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 47.9 and represents -13.00% change from the previous report. Their industry-leading book value factors momentum reinforces an expectation for future positive momentum for their stock price going forward. Consequently, their book value factors movement received a grade of 75. Also, IDEXX assets on their balance sheet, moved to 2.8B, which is a 2.00% change from the last period. These results, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. Therefore, its asset component earned a score of 74. However, one discouraging result, Liabilities, stood out. In terms of liabilities, IDEXX published uninspiring results. Their reported liabilities were 2.0B, representing a -8.00% change from the previous report. IDEXX's liabilities changes appear mediocre compared to their peers. Contextually, they convey that management finds balancing asset growth, resource allocation, and liabilities challenging. Its liabilities movement component, therefore, received a grade of 68. The company's balance sheet received an overall score of 79. income statement IDEXX's income statement showed strong financials, specifically EBITDA and Revenue Efficiency. IDEXX's management did a remarkable job this period managing its EBITDA. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 1.1B, which represents a 3.00% change from the last period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 30.38%. Its EBITDA metrics highlight an impressive overall financial performance, which is expected to continue moving forward. Therefore, its EBITDA component earned a score of 78. Also, IDEXX's financials reveal an interesting trend for their revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 15.78%. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', should support a positive movement in the company's stock price. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 67. On the other hand, Return Factors, jumped out as looking problematic. In this filing, IDEXX reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 94.4, which represents a growth of -10.00%. This metric might have a 3.26% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. They does not yet appear to be headed in the right direction regarding these return on equity and return on assets metrics. Therefore, their return factors component earned a score of 63. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the income statement was given a score of 76. cash flow Overall, IDEXX's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. IDEXX presents exciting net cash flow numbers for its recent financial release, illustrated by a net cash flow of -93.3M, which is a change of -192.00% from the last filing. The company is headed in the right direction regarding business priorities, exhibiting prudent net cash flow management and growth. Hence, its net cash flow earned a score of 88. Also, IDEXX's published free cash flow numbers were substantial and reflected management's focus on a healthy change strategy. IDEXX recorded free cash flow of 5.5, which represents a 19.00% change from the previous report. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 0.97%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. The company's free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 82. That said, one metric, Asset Turnover, stood out as particularly concerning. IDEXX's asset turnover numbers were discouraging, reflecting significant concerns related to management's ability to leverage assets to generate sales effectively and efficiently. IDEXX recorded asset turnover of 1.3, which represents a -2.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 2.11% percent by this parameter. The company's asset turnover metrics seem especially problematic relative to their peers. Underwhelming results in asset turnover metrics often lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated its asset turnover momentum 53. Their cash flow received an overall score of 84. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. IDEXX's stock is now priced above its 200-day, but below its 5-day and 50-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the long-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), IDEXX's stock appears overbought. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 47.
29,753	fundamental summary The financials published by Illumina for Q1 were weak and discouraging. Their growth, value, and income factors indicate a poor execution and strategy, which isn't generating exciting growth. Typically, results like these translate into sustained negative momentum and strong downward pressure on stock price. Therefore, Illumina earned a score of 57 and a UNDERPERFORM recommendation. balance sheet Illumina appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Illumina publishes impressive results related to book value factors in this report. Specifically, price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 4.9 and represents a 2.00% change from the previous report. These book value factor numbers show that management has been prudent in focusing on efficient growth. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its book value factors earned a score of 71. Also, In terms of liabilities, Illumina published good numbers. Their reported liabilities were 5.1B, representing a -9.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all interesting relative to their peers and suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect a higher intrinsic value. The company's liabilities movement component, therefore, received a grade of 66. However, one discouraging result, Cash & Equivalents, stood out. Illumina reported concerning cash and cash equivalents metrics in this filing. Specifically, they reported that cash and cash equivalents were 1.5B, representing a -26.00% change from the last period. The company's cash and cash equivalents metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Discouraging results like these statistically lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated their cash and cash equivalents with a score of 47. Therefore, it received a score of 64. income statement Overall, Illumina's critical income statement metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. In this filing, Illumina reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of -51.0, which represents a change of -0.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. The company's return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 91. Also, Illumina's financials reveal an interesting trend for their revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 15.78%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 88. That said, one metric, EBITDA, stood out as strongly negative. Illumina's management didn't make significant improvements to their EBITDA this period. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 483.2M, which represents a -27.00% change from the last period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 30.38%. The company's EBITDA metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Discouraging results like these statistically lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated their EBITDA a grade of 48. Consequently, their income statement earned a rank of 63. cash flow Overall, Illumina's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Illumina's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. Illumina recorded CapEx of -277.0M, which represents 3.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Therefore, its CapEx movement component earned a score of 74. Also, Illumina's management was effective in improving their net cash flow, which now sits at 143.0M and represents a -82.00% change from the previous report. This industry-leading net cash flow momentum should reinforce broader positive momentum for its's stock price going forward. The company's net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 61. That said, one metric, Free Cash flow, stood out as strongly negative. Free cash flow numbers published by Illumina were -1.4, which was a -208.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 0.97% percent by this parameter. their free cash flow situation appears to be much weaker than their peers. Management needs to do a better job balancing cash flow, asset growth, and resources allocations in general. Its free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 38. Because their management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash_flow was given a score of 65. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Illumina's stock is now priced below its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a negative setup in the near, medium, and long-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Illumina's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 37.
29,753	fundamental summary The financials published by Illumina for Q1 were weak and discouraging. Their growth, value, and income factors indicate a poor execution and strategy, which isn't generating exciting growth. Typically, results like these translate into sustained negative momentum and strong downward pressure on stock price. Therefore, Illumina earned a score of 57 and a UNDERPERFORM recommendation. balance sheet Illumina appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Illumina publishes impressive results related to book value factors in this report. Specifically, price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 4.9 and represents a 2.00% change from the previous report. These book value factor numbers show that management has been prudent in focusing on efficient growth. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its book value factors earned a score of 71. Also, In terms of liabilities, Illumina published good numbers. Their reported liabilities were 5.1B, representing a -9.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all interesting relative to their peers and suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect a higher intrinsic value. The company's liabilities movement component, therefore, received a grade of 66. However, one discouraging result, Cash & Equivalents, stood out. Illumina reported concerning cash and cash equivalents metrics in this filing. Specifically, they reported that cash and cash equivalents were 1.5B, representing a -26.00% change from the last period. The company's cash and cash equivalents metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Discouraging results like these statistically lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated their cash and cash equivalents with a score of 47. Therefore, it received a score of 64. income statement Overall, Illumina's critical income statement metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. In this filing, Illumina reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of -51.0, which represents a change of -0.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. The company's return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 91. Also, Illumina's financials reveal an interesting trend for their revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 15.78%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 88. That said, one metric, EBITDA, stood out as strongly negative. Illumina's management didn't make significant improvements to their EBITDA this period. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 483.2M, which represents a -27.00% change from the last period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 30.38%. The company's EBITDA metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Discouraging results like these statistically lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated their EBITDA a grade of 48. Consequently, their income statement earned a rank of 63. cash flow Overall, Illumina's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Illumina's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. Illumina recorded CapEx of -277.0M, which represents 3.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Therefore, its CapEx movement component earned a score of 74. Also, Illumina's management was effective in improving their net cash flow, which now sits at 143.0M and represents a -82.00% change from the previous report. This industry-leading net cash flow momentum should reinforce broader positive momentum for its's stock price going forward. The company's net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 61. That said, one metric, Free Cash flow, stood out as strongly negative. Free cash flow numbers published by Illumina were -1.4, which was a -208.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 0.97% percent by this parameter. their free cash flow situation appears to be much weaker than their peers. Management needs to do a better job balancing cash flow, asset growth, and resources allocations in general. Its free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 38. Because their management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash_flow was given a score of 65. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Illumina's stock is now priced below its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a negative setup in the near, medium, and long-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Illumina's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 37.
30,239	fundamental summary Intuitive Surgical's financial results from Q1 demonstrated decent performance, but will likely only help Intuitive Surgical remain on par with its peers. This typically translates into the stock performing on par with market performance for the upcoming quarter. Overall, Intuitive Surgical's income and value factors are trending positively, and we, therefore, give Intuitive Surgical an overall grade of 76 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Intuitive Surgical appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Intuitive Surgical reported a positive trendline in their cash and cash equivalents metrics. Specifically, they reported that cash and cash equivalents were 2.1B, representing 36.00% change from the last report. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. It suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect its actual intrinsic value. Therefore, its cash and cash equivalents movement earned a score of 90. Also, Intuitive Surgical's management was effective in managing the value of the assets on their balance sheet, which now sits at 13.1B and represents a 1.00% change from the previous report. This growth should support upward pressure on its's stock price, which better captures their intrinsic value. The company's asset component, therefore, received a grade of 83. That said, one metric, Equity, stood out as particularly concerning. Intuitive Surgical reported weak equity changes momentum this period. At filing, equity was reported as 11.2B, representing 2.00% change from the previous report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 9.65%. This performance is significantly less impressive than its peers and competitors. Therefore, their equity movement component earned a score of 69. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 88. income statement Intuitive Surgical appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Intuitive Surgical reported impressive EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 2.0B, representing -1.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 30.38%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 69. Also, Intuitive Surgical's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 11.4, representing a change of -2.00%. The company appears headed in the right direction in terms of these return factors, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 68. That said, one metric, Revenue Efficiency, stood out as particularly concerning. Intuitive Surgical reported discouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. As of the current filing, they were reported as 6.4B and represented 3.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 15.78% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', isn't encouraging. As a result, their revenue efficiency earned a score of 59. Therefore, it received a score of 66. cash flow Overall, Intuitive Surgical's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Free cash flow numbers published by Intuitive Surgical were 2.9, which was a 6.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 0.97%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Therefore, its free cash flow movement earned a score of 73. Also, Intuitive Surgical's strong net cash flow numbers, which were 1.0B in this filing, showed a 255.00% change from the last period. This industry-leading net cash flow momentum should reinforce broader positive momentum for its's stock price going forward. Hence, its net cash flow earned a score of 71. On the other hand, Capital Expenditure, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Intuitive Surgical's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were discouraging and reflected management's unbalanced growth strategy. Intuitive Surgical recorded CapEx of -632.9M, which represents a -19.00% change from the previous report. They appears to be headed in the wrong direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Its CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 46. Therefore, we scored its cash flow a 71. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Intuitive Surgical's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Intuitive Surgical's stock appears overbought. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 68.
30,239	fundamental summary Intuitive Surgical's financial results from Q1 demonstrated decent performance, but will likely only help Intuitive Surgical remain on par with its peers. This typically translates into the stock performing on par with market performance for the upcoming quarter. Overall, Intuitive Surgical's income and value factors are trending positively, and we, therefore, give Intuitive Surgical an overall grade of 76 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Intuitive Surgical appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Intuitive Surgical reported a positive trendline in their cash and cash equivalents metrics. Specifically, they reported that cash and cash equivalents were 2.1B, representing 36.00% change from the last report. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. It suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect its actual intrinsic value. Therefore, its cash and cash equivalents movement earned a score of 90. Also, Intuitive Surgical's management was effective in managing the value of the assets on their balance sheet, which now sits at 13.1B and represents a 1.00% change from the previous report. This growth should support upward pressure on its's stock price, which better captures their intrinsic value. The company's asset component, therefore, received a grade of 83. That said, one metric, Equity, stood out as particularly concerning. Intuitive Surgical reported weak equity changes momentum this period. At filing, equity was reported as 11.2B, representing 2.00% change from the previous report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 9.65%. This performance is significantly less impressive than its peers and competitors. Therefore, their equity movement component earned a score of 69. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 88. income statement Intuitive Surgical appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Intuitive Surgical reported impressive EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 2.0B, representing -1.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 30.38%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 69. Also, Intuitive Surgical's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 11.4, representing a change of -2.00%. The company appears headed in the right direction in terms of these return factors, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 68. That said, one metric, Revenue Efficiency, stood out as particularly concerning. Intuitive Surgical reported discouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. As of the current filing, they were reported as 6.4B and represented 3.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 15.78% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', isn't encouraging. As a result, their revenue efficiency earned a score of 59. Therefore, it received a score of 66. cash flow Overall, Intuitive Surgical's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Free cash flow numbers published by Intuitive Surgical were 2.9, which was a 6.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 0.97%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Therefore, its free cash flow movement earned a score of 73. Also, Intuitive Surgical's strong net cash flow numbers, which were 1.0B in this filing, showed a 255.00% change from the last period. This industry-leading net cash flow momentum should reinforce broader positive momentum for its's stock price going forward. Hence, its net cash flow earned a score of 71. On the other hand, Capital Expenditure, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Intuitive Surgical's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were discouraging and reflected management's unbalanced growth strategy. Intuitive Surgical recorded CapEx of -632.9M, which represents a -19.00% change from the previous report. They appears to be headed in the wrong direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Its CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 46. Therefore, we scored its cash flow a 71. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Intuitive Surgical's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Intuitive Surgical's stock appears overbought. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 68.
30,292	fundamental summary Iron Mountain's financial results from Q1 demonstrated decent performance but will likely only help Iron Mountain remain on par with its peers. The company's growth, value, and income factors all individually appear negative and will put significant pressure on the likelihood of continued positive performance. As such, Iron Mountain received an overall score of 62 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Iron Mountain's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Iron Mountain did a great job related to cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 146.4M, representing a 3.00% change from the previous filing. Its impressive cash and cash equivalents metrics should support upward pressure on its's stock price. The company's cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 75. Also, Iron Mountain produced great equity metrics for this filing, demonstrating management's skill in increasing shareholder value. Iron Mountain's equity was reported as 545.5M, which represents a -14.00% change from the last report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 9.70% percent by this parameter. These metrics are all the more impressive relative to their peers and should support an upswing in their stock price. The company's equity movement component, therefore, received a grade of 70. However, one discouraging result, Liabilities, stood out. Iron Mountain's liabilities stood at 15.8B in the current filing, which represents a 3.00% change from the previous report. Iron Mountain's liabilities changes appear mediocre compared to their peers. Contextually, they convey that management finds balancing asset growth, resource allocation, and liabilities challenging. Discouraging results like these statistically lead to negative movement in stock prices, so we rated their liabilities movement component 54. Consequently, its balance sheet earned a rank of 62. income statement Iron Mountain appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics, especially EBITDA and Revenue Efficiency. Iron Mountain's management was effective in improving its EBIDTA, which now sits at 2.3B and represents a 2.00% change from the last reporting period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 5.72%. The company is headed in the right direction regarding EBITDA, exhibiting efficient capital controls and strong overall financial performance. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 77. Also, Iron Mountain's financials reveal an interesting trend for their revenue efficiency. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.87%. Their impressive revenue efficiency is even more impressive relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. As a result, its revenue efficiency earned a score of 62. That said, one metric, Return Factors, stood out as strongly negative. In this filing, Iron Mountain reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 79.5, which represents a growth of 18.00%. This metric might have a 1.37% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. They does not yet appear to be headed in the right direction regarding these return on equity and return on assets metrics. Its return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 52. Consequently, the companie's income statement earned a rank of 60. cash flow Iron Mountain appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Iron Mountain's management was effective in improving their net cash flow, which now sits at -49.2M and represents a 57.00% change from the previous report. Their net cash flow metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. The company's net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 83. Also, Iron Mountain's published asset turnover numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. Iron Mountain recorded asset turnover of 0.3, which represents a -3.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 8.43% percent by this parameter. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly more impressive when contrasted against their peers and competitors. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 68. That said, one metric, Free Cash flow, stood out as particularly concerning. Iron Mountain's published free cash flow numbers were subpar and could mean that management has lost focus on achieving healthy growth. Iron Mountain recorded free cash flow of -0.2, which represents -151.00% growth from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 8.48%. These free cash flow numbers show that management has not been executing well in generating critical cash flow while also encouraging growth. Disappointing results in free cash flow often lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated their free cash flow with a score of 39. Therefore, we scored the company's cash flow a 63. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Iron Mountain's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Iron Mountain's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 83.
30,439	fundamental summary Looking at Juniper Networks's financials of Q1 reflected decent results. Its income and value factors appear positive and give support for optimism regarding the likelihood of continued positive performance. Therefore, Juniper Networks received an overall score of 76, translating into a HOLD ranking. balance sheet Overall, Juniper Networks's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Juniper Networks reported a positive trendline in their cash and cash equivalents metrics. Specifically, they reported that cash and cash equivalents were 923.5M, representing 5.00% change from the last report. This impressive growth, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. Consequently, their cash and cash equivalents movement received a grade of 75. Also, The company's assets section could set high expectations for Juniper Networks's future attractiveness, as they went to 9.3B, which is a -0.00% change from the last period. This growth should support upward pressure on its's stock price, which better captures their intrinsic value. Consequently, their asset movement received a grade of 74. That said, one metric, Book Value Factors, stood out as particularly concerning. Juniper Networks's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 2.2 and represents -6.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 0.36%. They does not yet appear to be headed in the right direction to achieve strong book value metrics. Therefore, their book value factors earned a score of 51. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 75. income statement Return Factors and EBITDA stand out as the most significant drivers of Juniper Networks's income statement's strength. Return factors metrics and ratios were exceptional in this report. Juniper Networks reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 11.5, representing a change of 7.00% from the last report. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 87. Also, Juniper Networks reported impressive EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 853.8M, representing 5.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 14.29%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Consequently, their EBITDA movement received a grade of 81. At the same time, one critical income statement metric, Revenue Efficiency, was notably weak. Juniper Networks's revenue efficiency metrics look especially concerning this period, highlighting issues management is having controlling and reducing expenses while increasing earnings. This metric might have a 19.93% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', isn't encouraging. Its revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 54. Therefore, their income statement earned a grade of 67. cash flow Juniper Networks appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Juniper Networks is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.6, representing a 4.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 20.80%. Their impressive asset turnover metrics, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support a tailwind in the company's stock price. The company's asset turnover movement, therefore, received a grade of 82. Also, Juniper Networks presents exciting net cash flow numbers for its recent financial release, illustrated by a net cash flow of -91.0M, which is a change of -102.00% from the last filing. Their net cash flow metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. The company's net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 68. At the same time, one critical cash flow metric, Free Cash flow, was notably weak. Juniper Networks did a poor job related to generating and maintaining strong free cash flow this period, which stood at -0.1, representing a -249.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 4.19% percent by this parameter. Their free cash flow situation is more concerning relative to their peers and competitors. Disappointing results in free cash flow often lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated their free cash flow with a score of 38. Consequently, their cash flow earned a score of 70. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Juniper Networks's stock is now priced below its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a negative setup in the near, medium, and long-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Juniper Networks's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 42.
30,643	fundamental summary Laboratory Corporation of America's recently released results from Q1 indicate that Laboratory Corporation of America is performing reasonably well and on par with its peers. We do believe, though, that macro-related market conditions will influence its performance more significantly than its individual results. Therefore, they earned a total score of 64 out of 100 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Laboratory Corporation of America appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Laboratory Corporation of America assets on their balance sheet, moved to 20.2B, which is a 0.00% change from the last period. This growth should support upward pressure on its's stock price, which better captures their intrinsic value. Consequently, their asset movement received a grade of 74. Also, In terms of liabilities, Laboratory Corporation of America published good numbers. Their reported liabilities were 9.8B, representing a -2.00% change from the previous report. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing liabilities, especially relative to their peers. The company's liabilities movement component, therefore, received a grade of 67. On the other hand, Cash & Equivalents, jumped out as looking problematic. Laboratory Corporation of America reported concerning cash and cash equivalents metrics in this filing. Specifically, they reported that cash and cash equivalents were 393.9M, representing a -8.00% change from the last period. Their anemic growth in cash and cash equivalents, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should hurt their stock price. Its cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 60. The company's balance sheet received an overall score of 73. income statement Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the income statement's strength in Laboratory Corporation of America's recent report: Revenue Efficiency and Return Factors. Laboratory Corporation of America reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 15.78%. Their impressive revenue efficiency is even more impressive relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 83. Also, In this filing, Laboratory Corporation of America reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 9.5, which represents a change of -24.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 75. On the other hand, EBITDA, jumped out as looking problematic. Laboratory Corporation of America's management didn't make significant improvements to their EBITDA this period. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 2.6B, which represents a -12.00% change from the last period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 30.38%. The company's EBITDA metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Therefore, their EBITDA component earned a score of 56. Consequently, their income statement earned a rank of 64. cash flow Capital Expenditure and Net Cash Flow stand out as the most significant drivers of Laboratory Corporation of America's cash flow's strength. Laboratory Corporation of America's management was effective in improving its CapEx, which now sits at -458.1M and represents 5.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Therefore, its CapEx movement component earned a score of 76. Also, Laboratory Corporation of America's strong net cash flow numbers, which were -839.6M in this filing, showed a 19.00% change from the last period. The company is headed in the right direction regarding business priorities, exhibiting prudent net cash flow management and growth. Consequently, their net cash flow movement received a grade of 60. However, one discouraging result, Free Cash flow, stood out. Free cash flow numbers published by Laboratory Corporation of America were 14.0, which was a -13.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 0.97%. their free cash flow situation appears to be much weaker than their peers. Management needs to do a better job balancing cash flow, asset growth, and resources allocations in general. Its free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 53. The company's cash flow received an overall score of 65. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Laboratory Corporation of America's stock is now priced above its 5-day, but below its 50-day and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Laboratory Corporation of America's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 47.
30,655	fundamental summary At a high level, the metrics from Lam Research's Q1 financial report release provided many positive indicators. Specifically, their growth, value, and income factors indicate a well-planned and balanced effort, which is generating exciting growth. These results lead us to believe that there should be significant upside potential for the stock. Therefore, they earned a total score of 82 out of 100 and a BUY recommendation. balance sheet Lam Research appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Lam Research did a great job related to cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 5.3B, representing a 18.00% change from the previous filing. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. It suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect its actual intrinsic value. Therefore, its cash and cash equivalents movement earned a score of 86. Also, Lam Research publishes impressive results related to book value factors in this report. Specifically, price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 8.2 and represents a 25.00% change from the previous report. The company's book value factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. The company's book value factors component, therefore, received a grade of 82. At the same time, one critical balance sheet metric, Liabilities, was notably weak. Lam Research's liabilities stood at 10.8B in the current filing, which represents a -1.00% change from the previous report. These liabilities metrics show that management has been unsuccessful in encouraging healthy growth while managing liabilities. Its liabilities movement component, therefore, received a grade of 70. Their balance sheet, therefore, earned a score of 80. income statement Lam Research appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Lam Research's financials reveal an interesting trend for their revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 19.93%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 75. Also, In this filing, Lam Research reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 68.1, which represents a change of -2.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 67. On the other hand, EBITDA, jumped out as looking problematic. Lam Research's EBIDTA now sits at 6.6B and represents -2.00% change from the last reporting period. This metric might have a 14.29% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Lam Research appears to be headed in the wrong direction in terms of EBITDA momentum, likely due to insufficient capital controls and a weaker than expected overall financial performance. Discouraging results like these statistically lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated their EBITDA a grade of 65. Consequently, their income statement earned a rank of 72. cash flow Overall, Lam Research's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Free cash flow numbers published by Lam Research were 29.0, which was a 35.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 4.19%. The company's free cash flow metrics are especially strong compared to its peers. Management seems to balance cash flow management, asset growth, and resource allocations in general. Consequently, their free cash flow movement received a grade of 82. Also, Lam Research's management was effective in improving its CapEx, which now sits at -548.6M and represents 5.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. The company's CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 76. That said, one metric, Asset Turnover, stood out as particularly concerning. Lam Research's asset turnover metrics were concerning and highlighted potential issues management is having effectively turning assets into sales efficiently. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 1.1, representing a -1.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 20.80% percent by this parameter. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly less impressive when compared to their peers and competitors. Underwhelming results in asset turnover metrics often lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated its asset turnover momentum 67. Therefore, we scored their cash flow a 70. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Lam Research's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Lam Research's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 83.
30,655	fundamental summary At a high level, the metrics from Lam Research's Q1 financial report release provided many positive indicators. Specifically, their growth, value, and income factors indicate a well-planned and balanced effort, which is generating exciting growth. These results lead us to believe that there should be significant upside potential for the stock. Therefore, they earned a total score of 82 out of 100 and a BUY recommendation. balance sheet Lam Research appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Lam Research did a great job related to cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 5.3B, representing a 18.00% change from the previous filing. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. It suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect its actual intrinsic value. Therefore, its cash and cash equivalents movement earned a score of 86. Also, Lam Research publishes impressive results related to book value factors in this report. Specifically, price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 8.2 and represents a 25.00% change from the previous report. The company's book value factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. The company's book value factors component, therefore, received a grade of 82. At the same time, one critical balance sheet metric, Liabilities, was notably weak. Lam Research's liabilities stood at 10.8B in the current filing, which represents a -1.00% change from the previous report. These liabilities metrics show that management has been unsuccessful in encouraging healthy growth while managing liabilities. Its liabilities movement component, therefore, received a grade of 70. Their balance sheet, therefore, earned a score of 80. income statement Lam Research appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Lam Research's financials reveal an interesting trend for their revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 19.93%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 75. Also, In this filing, Lam Research reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 68.1, which represents a change of -2.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 67. On the other hand, EBITDA, jumped out as looking problematic. Lam Research's EBIDTA now sits at 6.6B and represents -2.00% change from the last reporting period. This metric might have a 14.29% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Lam Research appears to be headed in the wrong direction in terms of EBITDA momentum, likely due to insufficient capital controls and a weaker than expected overall financial performance. Discouraging results like these statistically lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated their EBITDA a grade of 65. Consequently, their income statement earned a rank of 72. cash flow Overall, Lam Research's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Free cash flow numbers published by Lam Research were 29.0, which was a 35.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 4.19%. The company's free cash flow metrics are especially strong compared to its peers. Management seems to balance cash flow management, asset growth, and resource allocations in general. Consequently, their free cash flow movement received a grade of 82. Also, Lam Research's management was effective in improving its CapEx, which now sits at -548.6M and represents 5.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. The company's CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 76. That said, one metric, Asset Turnover, stood out as particularly concerning. Lam Research's asset turnover metrics were concerning and highlighted potential issues management is having effectively turning assets into sales efficiently. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 1.1, representing a -1.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 20.80% percent by this parameter. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly less impressive when compared to their peers and competitors. Underwhelming results in asset turnover metrics often lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated its asset turnover momentum 67. Therefore, we scored their cash flow a 70. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Lam Research's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Lam Research's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 83.
30,763	fundamental summary Lennar's recently released results from Q1 indicate that Lennar is performing reasonably well and on par with its peers. It is highly likely that Lennar will be mostly tethered to market performance and sector movements for the near term. Bottom line, Lennar's financials indicate solid performance in terms of income and value, which leads us to believe that they may become interesting again in the next few months. But for right now, we gave the company an overall grade of 75 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Lennar appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Lennar publishes solid book value factor metrics in this report. Price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 1.4 and represents a 29.00% change from the previous report. Their industry-leading book value factors momentum reinforces an expectation for future positive momentum for their stock price going forward. Consequently, their book value factors movement received a grade of 79. Also, Lennar did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 24.4B, representing a 1.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.17%. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. The company's equity movement component, therefore, received a grade of 76. That said, one metric, Liabilities, stood out as particularly concerning. At filing, Lennar's liabilities were 12.0B, representing a -13.00% change from the previous period. These liabilities metrics show that management has been unsuccessful in encouraging healthy growth while managing liabilities. Its liabilities movement component, therefore, received a grade of 40. Similarly, because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 73. income statement Lennar appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Lennar reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 19.36%. Their impressive revenue efficiency is even more impressive relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. As a result, its revenue efficiency earned a score of 72. Also, In this filing, Lennar reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 20.9, which represents a change of 2.00%. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 64. However, one discouraging result, EBITDA, stood out. Lennar's management didn't make significant improvements to their EBITDA this period. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 6.7B, which represents a -3.00% change from the last period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 18.90%. The company's EBITDA metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Its EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 62. Its income statement, therefore, earned a score of 66. cash flow Lennar appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Lennar presents exciting net cash flow numbers for its recent financial release, illustrated by a net cash flow of 2.7B, which is a change of 43.00% from the last filing. This industry-leading net cash flow momentum should reinforce broader positive momentum for its's stock price going forward. The company's net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 82. Also, Free cash flow numbers published by Lennar were 14.8, which was a 34.00% change from the previous filing. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.71%. These free cash flow numbers show that management has executed well while generating cash flow and encouraging growth. Therefore, its free cash flow movement earned a score of 82. On the other hand, Asset Turnover, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Lennar's asset turnover numbers were discouraging, reflecting significant concerns related to management's ability to leverage assets to generate sales effectively and efficiently. Lennar recorded asset turnover of 1.0, which represents a 4.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 1.59% percent by this parameter. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly less impressive when compared to their peers and competitors. Underwhelming results in asset turnover metrics often lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated its asset turnover momentum 56. Because the company's management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash flow was given a score of 80. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Lennar's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Lennar's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 73.
31,148	fundamental summary Marriott published its Q1 report on May 02, 2023 with positive results, but no significant factors particularly remarkable relative to its peers. The company's growth, value, and income factors all individually appear negative and will put significant pressure on the likelihood of continued positive performance. We therefore gave Marriott a total score of 65 out of 100 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Marriott's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Marriott's management was effective in improving its cash and cash equivalents metrics, which now sit at 554.0M. This represents 9.00% change from the last reporting period. This impressive growth, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. The company's cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 80. Also, The company's assets section could set high expectations for Marriott's future attractiveness, as they went to 24.9B, which is a 0.00% change from the last period. This performance is interesting in comparison to its peers and competitors. Therefore, its asset component earned a score of 68. On the other hand, Equity, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Marriott published concerning equity metrics for this filing. In the current report, equity stood at 140.0M, which represents a -75.00% change from the last report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.17%. These metrics are all the more disappointing relative to their peers and should blunt potential positive momentum in its's stock price. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 59. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 64. income statement Marriott appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Marriott reported impressive EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 4.4B, representing 10.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 18.90%. The company is headed in the right direction regarding EBITDA, exhibiting efficient capital controls and strong overall financial performance. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 85. Also, In this filing, Marriott reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 286.4, which represents a change of 20.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 85. At the same time, one critical income statement metric, Revenue Efficiency, was notably weak. Marriott management did an underwhelming job managing revenue efficiency this past period. Marriott's revenue efficiency is 6.8B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 26.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 19.36% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Its uninspiring revenue efficiency is even more concerning relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. As a result, their revenue efficiency earned a score of 38. Therefore, we scored its income statement a 65. cash flow Net Cash Flow and Free Cash flow stand out as the most significant drivers of Marriott's cash flow's strength. Marriott's strong net cash flow numbers, which were -496.0M in this filing, showed a 45.00% change from the last period. Their net cash flow metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. The company's net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 78. Also, Marriott did a great job related to free cash flow this period, which stood at 7.7, representing a 24.00% change from the previous filing. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.71%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Therefore, its free cash flow movement earned a score of 77. At the same time, one critical cash flow metric, Asset Turnover, was notably weak. Asset turnover metrics during this period were surprisingly weak. Their reported asset turnover metrics of 0.3, which represents a 27.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 1.59% percent by this parameter. The company's asset turnover metrics seem especially problematic relative to their peers. Therefore, their asset turnover movement earned a score of 40. Therefore, we scored its cash flow a 67. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Marriott's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Marriott's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 78.
31,148	fundamental summary Marriott published its Q1 report on May 02, 2023 with positive results, but no significant factors particularly remarkable relative to its peers. The company's growth, value, and income factors all individually appear negative and will put significant pressure on the likelihood of continued positive performance. We therefore gave Marriott a total score of 65 out of 100 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Marriott's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Marriott's management was effective in improving its cash and cash equivalents metrics, which now sit at 554.0M. This represents 9.00% change from the last reporting period. This impressive growth, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. The company's cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 80. Also, The company's assets section could set high expectations for Marriott's future attractiveness, as they went to 24.9B, which is a 0.00% change from the last period. This performance is interesting in comparison to its peers and competitors. Therefore, its asset component earned a score of 68. On the other hand, Equity, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Marriott published concerning equity metrics for this filing. In the current report, equity stood at 140.0M, which represents a -75.00% change from the last report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.17%. These metrics are all the more disappointing relative to their peers and should blunt potential positive momentum in its's stock price. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 59. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 64. income statement Marriott appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Marriott reported impressive EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 4.4B, representing 10.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 18.90%. The company is headed in the right direction regarding EBITDA, exhibiting efficient capital controls and strong overall financial performance. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 85. Also, In this filing, Marriott reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 286.4, which represents a change of 20.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 85. At the same time, one critical income statement metric, Revenue Efficiency, was notably weak. Marriott management did an underwhelming job managing revenue efficiency this past period. Marriott's revenue efficiency is 6.8B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 26.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 19.36% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Its uninspiring revenue efficiency is even more concerning relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. As a result, their revenue efficiency earned a score of 38. Therefore, we scored its income statement a 65. cash flow Net Cash Flow and Free Cash flow stand out as the most significant drivers of Marriott's cash flow's strength. Marriott's strong net cash flow numbers, which were -496.0M in this filing, showed a 45.00% change from the last period. Their net cash flow metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. The company's net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 78. Also, Marriott did a great job related to free cash flow this period, which stood at 7.7, representing a 24.00% change from the previous filing. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.71%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Therefore, its free cash flow movement earned a score of 77. At the same time, one critical cash flow metric, Asset Turnover, was notably weak. Asset turnover metrics during this period were surprisingly weak. Their reported asset turnover metrics of 0.3, which represents a 27.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 1.59% percent by this parameter. The company's asset turnover metrics seem especially problematic relative to their peers. Therefore, their asset turnover movement earned a score of 40. Therefore, we scored its cash flow a 67. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Marriott's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Marriott's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 78.
31,153	fundamental summary Looking at Martin Marietta's financials of Q1 reflected decent results. This typically translates into the stock performing on par with market performance for the upcoming quarter. Therefore, Martin Marietta received an overall score of 71, translating into a HOLD ranking. balance sheet Assets and Liabilities stood out as the most significant drivers of Martin Marietta's balance sheet strength. The company's assets section could set high expectations for Martin Marietta's future attractiveness, as they went to 14.9B, which is a -1.00% change from the last period. This growth should support upward pressure on its's stock price, which better captures their intrinsic value. The company's asset component, therefore, received a grade of 80. Also, In terms of liabilities, Martin Marietta published good numbers. Their reported liabilities were 7.7B, representing a -1.00% change from the previous report. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing liabilities, especially relative to their peers. These results statistically lead to positive movement in stock prices, so we rated its liabilities movement component 75. On the other hand, Cash & Equivalents, jumped out as looking problematic. Martin Marietta's management did a relatively poor job managing cash and cash equivalents, which now sit at 229.4M and represents a -36.00% change from the last reporting period. Their anemic growth in cash and cash equivalents, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should hurt their stock price. Consequently, their cash and cash equivalents movement received a grade of 43. The company's balance sheet received an overall score of 63. income statement Return Factors and EBITDA stand out as the most significant drivers of Martin Marietta's income statement's strength. In this filing, Martin Marietta reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 14.2, which represents a change of 14.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 92. Also, Martin Marietta reported impressive EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 1.9B, representing 8.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 21.19%. The company is headed in the right direction regarding EBITDA, exhibiting efficient capital controls and strong overall financial performance. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 90. On the other hand, Revenue Efficiency, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Martin Marietta's revenue efficiency metrics look especially concerning this period, highlighting issues management is having controlling and reducing expenses while increasing earnings. This metric might have a 26.10% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Its uninspiring revenue efficiency is even more concerning relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 54. Therefore, it received a score of 73. cash flow Two main cash flow metrics, Asset Turnover and Net Cash Flow, are driving the positive outlook for Martin Marietta's financial strength. Martin Marietta is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.4, representing a 3.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 8.68% percent by this parameter. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly more impressive when contrasted against their peers and competitors. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 90. Also, Martin Marietta's strong net cash flow numbers, which were 39.9M in this filing, showed a -60.00% change from the last period. The company is headed in the right direction regarding business priorities, exhibiting prudent net cash flow management and growth. The company's net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 67. On the other hand, Free Cash flow, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Free cash flow numbers published by Martin Marietta were 7.5, which was a -8.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 4.15% percent by this parameter. These free cash flow numbers show that management has not been executing well in generating critical cash flow while also encouraging growth. Its free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 62. Consequently, their cash flow earned a score of 75. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Martin Marietta's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Martin Marietta's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 83.
31,158	fundamental summary At a high level, the metrics from Marvell's Q1 financial report release were demonstrably negative. Their negative income, growth, and value factors indicate that the company is finding it increasingly difficult to produce impressive numbers. These results indicate a weak growth potential for Marvell's stock's price moving forward. Therefore, we assessed them with a rating of 58 and a UNDERPERFORM recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Marvell's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Marvell reported a positive trendline in their cash and cash equivalents metrics. Specifically, they reported that cash and cash equivalents were 1.0B, representing 13.00% change from the last report. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. It suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect its actual intrinsic value. Consequently, their cash and cash equivalents movement received a grade of 83. Also, Marvell publishes impressive results related to book value factors in this report. Specifically, price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 3.3 and represents a 43.00% change from the previous report. These book value factor numbers show that management has been prudent in focusing on efficient growth. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its book value factors earned a score of 80. At the same time, one critical balance sheet metric, Equity, was notably weak. Marvell management produced disappointing equity metrics this period, which stood at 15.5B, representing a -1.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 5.93%. These metrics are all the more disappointing relative to their peers and should blunt potential positive momentum in its's stock price. Therefore, their equity movement component earned a score of 51. Their balance sheet, therefore, earned a score of 65. income statement Marvell seems to be balancing strong Revenue Efficiency and EBITDA along with an overall impressive positive income statement. Marvell did an excellent job managing its revenue efficiency this past period. Marvell's revenue efficiency is 5.8B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a -2.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 19.93%. Their impressive revenue efficiency is even more impressive relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 79. Also, Marvell's management was effective in improving its EBIDTA, which now sits at 1.6B and represents a -11.00% change from the last reporting period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 14.29%. Its EBITDA metrics highlight an impressive overall financial performance, which is expected to continue moving forward. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 55. On the other hand, Return Factors, jumped out as looking problematic. Marvell's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was -1.1, representing a change of -3.00%. This metric might have a 2.58% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. These numbers show that management has been unsuccessful in fostering appropriate growth related to return on assets and return on equity momentum relative to their peers. Its return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 49. Because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the income statement was given a score of 68. cash flow Marvell's recently published cash flow conveys disappointing growth, particularly with respect to Capital Expenditure and Free Cash flow metrics. Marvell's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were discouraging and reflected management's unbalanced growth strategy. Marvell recorded CapEx of -269.1M, which represents a -31.00% change from the previous report. They appears to be headed in the wrong direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Its CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 42. Also, Free cash flow numbers published by Marvell were 1.2, which was a -5.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 4.19% percent by this parameter. Their free cash flow situation is more concerning relative to their peers and competitors. Its free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 57. On the other hand, Net Cash Flow, jumped out as looking rather positive. Marvell's management was effective in improving their net cash flow, which now sits at 563.3M and represents a 89.00% change from the previous report. This industry-leading net cash flow momentum should reinforce broader positive momentum for its's stock price going forward. Hence, its net cash flow earned a score of 58. Therefore, the company's cash flow earned a grade of 55. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Marvell's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Marvell's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 83.
31,348	fundamental summary Medtronic's financial reports for Q1 showed some underwhelming results. Specifically, their growth, value, and income factors indicate an execution challenge when it comes to generating exciting and consistent growth. Typically, results like these translate into sustained negative momentum and strong downward pressure on stock price. As such, Medtronic received an overall score of 59 and a UNDERPERFORM recommendation. balance sheet Medtronic appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. In terms of liabilities, Medtronic published good numbers. Their reported liabilities were 39.3B, representing a -8.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all interesting relative to their peers and suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect a higher intrinsic value. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 92. Also, Medtronic publishes impressive results related to book value factors in this report. Specifically, price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 2.1 and represents a 0.00% change from the previous report. The company's book value factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. Consequently, their book value factors movement received a grade of 71. However, one discouraging result, Cash & Equivalents, stood out. Medtronic did a poor job related to managing cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 1.5B, representing a -66.00% change from the previous filing. The company's cash and cash equivalents metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Consequently, their cash and cash equivalents movement received a grade of 37. Therefore, the company's balance sheet earned a grade of 62. income statement Medtronic's income statement report highlighted several concerning metrics. Medtronic reported concerning EBITDA this period. At filing, EBITDA was reported as 9.2B, representing -5.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 19.55% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their EBITDA metrics are even more problematic when compared to their peers. Therefore, their EBITDA component earned a score of 54. Also, Medtronic reported discouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. As of the current filing, they were reported as 31.2B and represented 1.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 1.24% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', isn't encouraging. As a result, their revenue efficiency earned a score of 65. However, one encouraging metric, Return Factors, stood out. In this filing, Medtronic reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 7.2, which represents a change of -7.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 66. Therefore, it received a cautionary score of 58. cash flow Overall, Medtronic's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Medtronic presents exciting net cash flow numbers for its recent financial release, illustrated by a net cash flow of -2.2B, which is a change of -308.00% from the last filing. The company is headed in the right direction regarding business priorities, exhibiting prudent net cash flow management and growth. Hence, its net cash flow earned a score of 83. Also, Medtronic's management was effective in improving its CapEx, which now sits at -1.5B and represents 1.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Therefore, its CapEx movement component earned a score of 76. On the other hand, Asset Turnover, jumped out as looking problematic. Medtronic's asset turnover numbers were discouraging, reflecting significant concerns related to management's ability to leverage assets to generate sales effectively and efficiently. Medtronic recorded asset turnover of 0.3, which represents a 4.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 15.58%. The company's asset turnover metrics seem especially problematic relative to their peers. Underwhelming results in asset turnover metrics often lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated its asset turnover momentum 47. Consequently, its cash flow earned a score of 66. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Medtronic's stock is now priced below its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a negative setup in the near, medium, and long-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Medtronic's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 42.
31,468	fundamental summary Mettler-Toledo's financial results from Q1 demonstrated decent performance, but will likely only help Mettler-Toledo remain on par with its peers. Its growth and income factors appear positive and give support for optimism regarding the likelihood of continued positive performance. Overall, Mettler-Toledo's growth and income factors are trending positively, and we, therefore, give Mettler-Toledo an overall grade of 71 and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Two main balance sheet metrics are driving the positive outlook for Mettler-Toledo's financial strength going forward. Mettler-Toledo produced great equity metrics for this filing, demonstrating management's skill in increasing shareholder value. Mettler-Toledo's equity was reported as -24.5M, which represents a -199.00% change from the last report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 9.65%. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. The company's equity movement component, therefore, received a grade of 80. Also, The company's assets section could set high expectations for Mettler-Toledo's future attractiveness, as they went to 3.4B, which is a -2.00% change from the last period. This growth should support upward pressure on its's stock price, which better captures their intrinsic value. Therefore, its asset component earned a score of 63. That said, one metric, Book Value Factors, stood out as strongly negative. Mettler-Toledo publishes concerning book value factor metrics in this report. price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at -1.2K and represents -195.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 16.77%. They does not yet appear to be headed in the right direction to achieve strong book value metrics. Consequently, their book value factors movement received a grade of 37. Similarly, because their management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 62. income statement Mettler-Toledo appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics, especially EBITDA and Revenue Efficiency. Mettler-Toledo's management was effective in improving its EBIDTA, which now sits at 1.3B and represents a 2.00% change from the last reporting period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 30.38%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Consequently, their EBITDA movement received a grade of 74. Also, Mettler-Toledo reported highly encouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 15.78%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 72. On the other hand, Return Factors, jumped out as looking problematic. In this filing, Mettler-Toledo reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 3.0K, which represents a growth of 232.00%. This metric might have a 3.26% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. These numbers show that management has been unsuccessful in fostering appropriate growth related to return on assets and return on equity momentum relative to their peers. Its return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 69. Consequently, the companie's income statement earned a rank of 75. cash flow Overall, Mettler-Toledo's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Mettler-Toledo presents exciting net cash flow numbers for its recent financial release, illustrated by a net cash flow of -27.9M, which is a change of -973.00% from the last filing. Their net cash flow metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. Hence, its net cash flow earned a score of 85. Also, Free cash flow numbers published by Mettler-Toledo were 35.7, which was a 9.00% change from the previous filing. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 0.97%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. The company's free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 75. On the other hand, Capital Expenditure, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Mettler-Toledo's management did not a remarkable job this period managing capital expenditures (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -124.9M, which represents a -3.00% change from the last period. This performance is all the more uninspiring relative to their peers and competitors. Therefore, their CapEx movement component earned a score of 60. Therefore, we scored its cash flow a 85. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Mettler-Toledo's stock is now priced below its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a negative setup in the near, medium, and long-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Mettler-Toledo's stock appears overbought. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 37.
31,500	fundamental summary Microchip released impressive Q1 results on May 25, 2023. Their income and value factors performance indicate that company management is focused on the right targets and executing well. This relative strength should allow Microchip to continue to perform well even in a tough market. We gave Microchip a 82 rating and a BUY recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Microchip's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Microchip did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 6.5B, representing a 3.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 5.93%. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. Therefore, its equity movement component earned a score of 88. Also, In terms of liabilities, Microchip published good numbers. Their reported liabilities were 9.9B, representing a 1.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all interesting relative to their peers and suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect a higher intrinsic value. The company's liabilities movement component, therefore, received a grade of 82. On the other hand, Cash & Equivalents, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Microchip reported concerning cash and cash equivalents metrics in this filing. Specifically, they reported that cash and cash equivalents were 234.0M, representing a -19.00% change from the last period. Their anemic growth in cash and cash equivalents, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should hurt their stock price. Its cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 49. Similarly, because their management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 90. income statement Overall, Microchip's critical income statement metrics appear to strongly support positive growth going forward. In this filing, Microchip reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 36.1, which represents a change of 5.00%. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 86. Also, Microchip's management was effective in improving its EBIDTA, which now sits at 4.2B and represents a 6.00% change from the last reporting period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 14.29%. Its EBITDA metrics highlight an impressive overall financial performance, which is expected to continue moving forward. Therefore, its EBITDA component earned a score of 84. That said, one metric, Revenue Efficiency, stood out as particularly concerning. Microchip management did an underwhelming job managing revenue efficiency this past period. Microchip's revenue efficiency is 8.4B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 5.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 19.93% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency does not make a compelling case for upward pressure on the company's stock price. As a result, their revenue efficiency earned a score of 49. Therefore, it received a score of 66. cash flow Two main cash flow metrics, Asset Turnover and Capital Expenditure, are driving the positive outlook for Microchip's financial strength. Microchip's published asset turnover numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. Microchip recorded asset turnover of 0.5, which represents a 4.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 20.80% percent by this parameter. Its asset turnover metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its asset turnover movement earned a score of 73. Also, Microchip's management did a great job this period managing its capital expenditure (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -485.3M, which represents a 0.00% change from the last period. The company appears to be headed in the right direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Therefore, its CapEx movement component earned a score of 69. On the other hand, Free Cash flow, jumped out as looking problematic. Microchip did a poor job related to generating and maintaining strong free cash flow this period, which stood at 5.7, representing a -1.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 4.19%. Their free cash flow situation is more concerning relative to their peers and competitors. Consequently, their free cash flow movement received a grade of 60. Consequently, the company's cash flow earned a score of 69. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Microchip's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Microchip's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 78.
31,500	fundamental summary Microchip released impressive Q1 results on May 25, 2023. Their income and value factors performance indicate that company management is focused on the right targets and executing well. This relative strength should allow Microchip to continue to perform well even in a tough market. We gave Microchip a 82 rating and a BUY recommendation. balance sheet Overall, Microchip's critical balance sheet metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. Microchip did a great job related to equity this period, which stood at 6.5B, representing a 3.00% change. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 5.93%. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. Therefore, its equity movement component earned a score of 88. Also, In terms of liabilities, Microchip published good numbers. Their reported liabilities were 9.9B, representing a 1.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all interesting relative to their peers and suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect a higher intrinsic value. The company's liabilities movement component, therefore, received a grade of 82. On the other hand, Cash & Equivalents, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Microchip reported concerning cash and cash equivalents metrics in this filing. Specifically, they reported that cash and cash equivalents were 234.0M, representing a -19.00% change from the last period. Their anemic growth in cash and cash equivalents, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should hurt their stock price. Its cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 49. Similarly, because their management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 90. income statement Overall, Microchip's critical income statement metrics appear to strongly support positive growth going forward. In this filing, Microchip reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 36.1, which represents a change of 5.00%. Its return factor metrics are even more remarkable when compared to their peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 86. Also, Microchip's management was effective in improving its EBIDTA, which now sits at 4.2B and represents a 6.00% change from the last reporting period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 14.29%. Its EBITDA metrics highlight an impressive overall financial performance, which is expected to continue moving forward. Therefore, its EBITDA component earned a score of 84. That said, one metric, Revenue Efficiency, stood out as particularly concerning. Microchip management did an underwhelming job managing revenue efficiency this past period. Microchip's revenue efficiency is 8.4B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 5.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 19.93% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency does not make a compelling case for upward pressure on the company's stock price. As a result, their revenue efficiency earned a score of 49. Therefore, it received a score of 66. cash flow Two main cash flow metrics, Asset Turnover and Capital Expenditure, are driving the positive outlook for Microchip's financial strength. Microchip's published asset turnover numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. Microchip recorded asset turnover of 0.5, which represents a 4.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 20.80% percent by this parameter. Its asset turnover metrics are especially remarkable relative to their peers. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its asset turnover movement earned a score of 73. Also, Microchip's management did a great job this period managing its capital expenditure (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -485.3M, which represents a 0.00% change from the last period. The company appears to be headed in the right direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Therefore, its CapEx movement component earned a score of 69. On the other hand, Free Cash flow, jumped out as looking problematic. Microchip did a poor job related to generating and maintaining strong free cash flow this period, which stood at 5.7, representing a -1.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 4.19%. Their free cash flow situation is more concerning relative to their peers and competitors. Consequently, their free cash flow movement received a grade of 60. Consequently, the company's cash flow earned a score of 69. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Microchip's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Microchip's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 78.
31,670	fundamental summary Looking at Mohawk Industries, Inc.'s financials of Q1 reflected unimpressive, mediocre results. Their growth and value factors performance indicate that company management is having trouble hitting the right targets or executing. We gave Mohawk Industries, Inc. a 66 rating and a HOLD recommendation. balance sheet Mohawk Industries, Inc. appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Mohawk has done an excellent job managing its liabilities. Mohawk's liabilities stood at 6.7B in the current filing, which represents a 9.00% change from the previous report. These liabilities changes appear balanced compared to their peers and project the message that management is capable and focused on balancing asset growth, resource allocation, and growing liabilities. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 89. Also, Mohawk did a great job related to cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 572.9M, representing a 12.00% change from the previous filing. This impressive growth, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. Therefore, its cash and cash equivalents movement earned a score of 83. However, one concerning metric, Equity, stood out. Mohawk reported weak equity changes momentum this period. At filing, equity was reported as 8.1B, representing 1.00% change from the previous report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.17%. Their equity metrics appear unremarkable relative to their peers. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 60. The company's balance sheet, Therefore, earned a score of 62. income statement Mohawk Industries, Inc. appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. Mohawk's financials reveal an interesting trend for their revenue efficiency. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 19.36%. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', should support a positive movement in the company's stock price. Consequently, their revenue efficiency received a grade of 84. Also, Mohawk's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was -1.7, representing a change of -642.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. Therefore, its return factors component earned a score of 46. However, one discouraging result, EBITDA, stood out. Mohawk's EBIDTA now sits at 1.8B and represents -7.00% change from the last reporting period. This metric might have a 18.90% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Mohawk appears to be headed in the wrong direction in terms of EBITDA momentum, likely due to insufficient capital controls and a weaker than expected overall financial performance. Its EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 45. Consequently, their income statement earned a rank of 60. cash flow Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the cash flow's strength in Mohawk Industries, Inc.'s recent report: Free Cash flow and Asset Turnover. Mohawk's published free cash flow numbers were substantial and reflected management's focus on a healthy change strategy. Mohawk recorded free cash flow of 4.6, which represents a 231.00% change from the previous report. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 2.71%. Their free cash flow situation is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. Consequently, their free cash flow movement received a grade of 95. Also, Mohawk is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.8, representing a -4.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 1.59% percent by this parameter. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly more impressive when contrasted against their peers and competitors. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 85. However, one discouraging result, Net Cash Flow, stood out. Mohawk's net cash flow metrics were 342.3M according to their current filing, which represents a 42.00% change from the previous report. Mohawk's net cash flow metrics are especially disappointing relative to their peers. Hence, their net cash flow earned a score of 73. Because the company's management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the cash flow was given a score of 78. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Mohawk's stock is now priced above its 5-day and 50-day, but below its 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is weakening. Historically, this is a positive setup in both the short and medium-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Mohawk's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal negative momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 57.
31,726	fundamental summary At a high level, the metrics from Southwest Airlines's Q1 financial report release were demonstrably negative. Their growth, value, and income factors indicate a poor execution and strategy, which isn't generating exciting growth. These results suggest a challenging future for Southwest Airlines's stock. Therefore, Southwest Airlines earned a score of 54 and a UNDERPERFORM recommendation. balance sheet Southwest Airlines's recently published balance sheet conveys disappointing growth, particularly with respect to Equity and Book Value Factors metrics. Southwest Airlines reported weak equity changes momentum this period. At filing, equity was reported as 10.3B, representing -4.00% change from the previous report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 4.89%. This performance is significantly less impressive than its peers and competitors. Its equity movement component, therefore, received a grade of 45. Also, Southwest Airlines publishes concerning book value factor metrics in this report. price to book ratio (P/B) now sits at 1.8 and represents -2.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 7.26%. Their book value factor metrics are even more concerning when compared to their peers. Consequently, their book value factors movement received a grade of 49. At the same time, one balance sheet metric, Liabilities, was actually strongly positive. Southwest Airlines has done an excellent job managing its liabilities. Southwest Airlines's liabilities stood at 25.2B in the current filing, which represents a 2.00% change from the previous report. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing liabilities, especially relative to their peers. These results statistically lead to positive movement in stock prices, so we rated its liabilities movement component 79. The company's balance sheet, Therefore, earned a score of 51. income statement Southwest Airlines appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. In this filing, Southwest Airlines reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 6.3, which represents a change of 24.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. The company's return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 69. Also, Southwest Airlines's management was effective in improving its EBIDTA, which now sits at 2.6B and represents a -1.00% change from the last reporting period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 9.69%. Its EBITDA metrics highlight an impressive overall financial performance, which is expected to continue moving forward. The company's EBITDA movement, therefore, received a grade of 68. At the same time, one critical income statement metric, Revenue Efficiency, was notably weak. Southwest Airlines's revenue efficiency metrics look especially concerning this period, highlighting issues management is having controlling and reducing expenses while increasing earnings. This metric might have a 24.16% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their revenue efficiency, specifically in contrast to their industry peers', isn't encouraging. Its revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 57. Therefore, it received a score of 64. cash flow Southwest Airlines's most recent cash flow report has several troubling numbers, specifically Free Cash flow and Capital Expenditure. Southwest Airlines's published free cash flow numbers were subpar and could mean that management has lost focus on achieving healthy growth. Southwest Airlines recorded free cash flow of -1.8, which represents -578.00% growth from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 4.12%. Their free cash flow situation is more concerning relative to their peers and competitors. Its free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 38. Also, Southwest Airlines's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were discouraging and reflected management's unbalanced growth strategy. Southwest Airlines recorded CapEx of -4.5B, which represents a -14.00% change from the previous report. They appears to be headed in the wrong direction regarding resource allocation, exhibiting prudent capital expenditure growth compared to its peers. Its CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 52. However, one encouraging metric, Asset Turnover, stood out. Southwest Airlines is doing a remarkable job of keeping its asset turnover under control. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.7, representing a 3.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 5.26% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their impressive asset turnover metrics, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support a tailwind in the company's stock price. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 75. Consequently, its cash flow earned a rank of 55. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Southwest Airlines's stock is now priced above its 5-day, but below its 50-day and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near-term. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Southwest Airlines's stock indicates that it's likely oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal negative momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 57.
31,860	fundamental summary According to their recent financial report, which was published on May 02, 2023, AMETEK had several impressive financial metrics that should make them more attractive than their peers going forward. Their growth, value, and income factors performance indicate that company management is focused on the right targets and executing well. We expect that this positive performance will continue in the coming months, and anticipate that AMETEK will maintain good momentum even in a challenging environment. As such, AMETEK received an overall score of 79 and a BUY recommendation. balance sheet AMETEK appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. AMETEK's management was effective in improving its cash and cash equivalents metrics, which now sit at 399.9M. This represents 16.00% change from the last reporting period. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. It suggests that their stock price has room to grow to reflect its actual intrinsic value. The company's cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 84. Also, AMETEK's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 4.3 and represents -1.00% change from the previous report. These book value factor numbers show that management has been prudent in focusing on efficient growth. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its book value factors earned a score of 77. On the other hand, Liabilities, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. At filing, AMETEK's liabilities were 4.9B, representing a -2.00% change from the previous period. These liabilities metrics show that management has been unsuccessful in encouraging healthy growth while managing liabilities. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 66. Their balance sheet, therefore, earned a score of 77. income statement Return Factors and EBITDA stand out as the most significant drivers of AMETEK's income statement's strength. In this filing, AMETEK reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 16.2, which represents a change of 0.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. The company's return factors (ROA & ROE) components, therefore, received a grade of 74. Also, AMETEK's management did a remarkable job this period managing its EBITDA. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 1.9B, which represents a 3.00% change from the last period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 9.69%. Its EBITDA metrics highlight an impressive overall financial performance, which is expected to continue moving forward. Therefore, its EBITDA component earned a score of 68. On the other hand, Revenue Efficiency, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. AMETEK reported discouraging numbers for its revenue efficiency. As of the current filing, they were reported as 6.3B and represented 2.00% change from the previous period. This metric might have a 24.16% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Its uninspiring revenue efficiency is even more concerning relative to its peers and competitors in the current market. Its revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 66. Therefore, we scored its income statement a 70. cash flow Overall, AMETEK's critical cash flow metrics appear to signal strong support and a high likelihood of positive growth going forward. AMETEK presents exciting net cash flow numbers for its recent financial release, illustrated by a net cash flow of 59.6M, which is a change of 4398.00% from the last filing. This industry-leading net cash flow momentum should reinforce broader positive momentum for its's stock price going forward. Hence, its net cash flow earned a score of 77. Also, AMETEK's published asset turnover numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. AMETEK recorded asset turnover of 0.5, which represents a 1.00% change from the previous report. This metric might have a 5.26% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. Their impressive asset turnover metrics, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support a tailwind in the company's stock price. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 76. On the other hand, Capital Expenditure, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. AMETEK's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were discouraging and reflected management's unbalanced growth strategy. AMETEK recorded CapEx of -132.6M, which represents a -4.00% change from the previous report. The company's disappointing CapEx growth is expected to stunt the momentum they hoped for this period. Its CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 62. Its cash flow received an overall score of 75. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. AMETEK's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), AMETEK's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 78.
32,012	fundamental summary Netflix released impressive Q1 results on Apr 21, 2023. Their income and value factors indicate a well-executed and balanced strategy, which is generating exciting income. We expect that this positive performance will continue in the coming months, and anticipate that Netflix will maintain good momentum even in a challenging environment. Therefore, they earned a total score of 79 out of 100 and a BUY recommendation. balance sheet Netflix appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Netflix did a great job related to cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 6.7B, representing a 30.00% change from the previous filing. This impressive growth, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. Therefore, its cash and cash equivalents movement earned a score of 91. Also, Netflix's management was effective in managing the value of the assets on their balance sheet, which now sits at 49.5B and represents a 2.00% change from the previous report. This growth should support upward pressure on its's stock price, which better captures their intrinsic value. The company's asset component, therefore, received a grade of 87. However, one concerning metric, Liabilities, stood out. At filing, Netflix's liabilities were 27.7B, representing a -1.00% change from the previous period. This performance is relatively weak in comparison to their peers and suggests that its's stock price will likely suffer until this is solved. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 65. Therefore, it received a score of 91. income statement Netflix's income statement showed strong financials, specifically Revenue Efficiency and EBITDA. Netflix did an excellent job managing its revenue efficiency this past period. Netflix's revenue efficiency is 31.9B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 1.00% change from the previous report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 11.83%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 66. Also, Netflix's management was effective in improving its EBIDTA, which now sits at 6.4B and represents a -3.00% change from the last reporting period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 17.24%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its EBITDA component earned a score of 61. However, one discouraging result, Return Factors, stood out. Netflix's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 21.3, representing a change of -13.00%. This metric might have a 6.57% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. These numbers show that management has been unsuccessful in fostering appropriate growth related to return on assets and return on equity momentum relative to their peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 56. their income statement received an overall score of 61. cash flow Netflix appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Netflix's published free cash flow numbers were substantial and reflected management's focus on a healthy change strategy. Netflix recorded free cash flow of 6.6, which represents a 81.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 2.18%. These free cash flow numbers show that management has executed well while generating cash flow and encouraging growth. The company's free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 93. Also, Netflix's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. Netflix recorded CapEx of -348.6M, which represents 15.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. The company's CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 89. On the other hand, Asset Turnover, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Netflix's asset turnover numbers were discouraging, reflecting significant concerns related to management's ability to leverage assets to generate sales effectively and efficiently. Netflix recorded asset turnover of 0.7, which represents a -1.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 2.38%. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly less impressive when compared to their peers and competitors. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 59. Therefore, the company's cash flow earned a grade of 84. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Netflix's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Netflix's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 78.
32,012	fundamental summary Netflix released impressive Q1 results on Apr 21, 2023. Their income and value factors indicate a well-executed and balanced strategy, which is generating exciting income. We expect that this positive performance will continue in the coming months, and anticipate that Netflix will maintain good momentum even in a challenging environment. Therefore, they earned a total score of 79 out of 100 and a BUY recommendation. balance sheet Netflix appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. Netflix did a great job related to cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 6.7B, representing a 30.00% change from the previous filing. This impressive growth, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. Therefore, its cash and cash equivalents movement earned a score of 91. Also, Netflix's management was effective in managing the value of the assets on their balance sheet, which now sits at 49.5B and represents a 2.00% change from the previous report. This growth should support upward pressure on its's stock price, which better captures their intrinsic value. The company's asset component, therefore, received a grade of 87. However, one concerning metric, Liabilities, stood out. At filing, Netflix's liabilities were 27.7B, representing a -1.00% change from the previous period. This performance is relatively weak in comparison to their peers and suggests that its's stock price will likely suffer until this is solved. Therefore, we rated their liabilities movement with a score of 65. Therefore, it received a score of 91. income statement Netflix's income statement showed strong financials, specifically Revenue Efficiency and EBITDA. Netflix did an excellent job managing its revenue efficiency this past period. Netflix's revenue efficiency is 31.9B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a 1.00% change from the previous report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 11.83%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 66. Also, Netflix's management was effective in improving its EBIDTA, which now sits at 6.4B and represents a -3.00% change from the last reporting period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 17.24%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its EBITDA component earned a score of 61. However, one discouraging result, Return Factors, stood out. Netflix's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 21.3, representing a change of -13.00%. This metric might have a 6.57% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. These numbers show that management has been unsuccessful in fostering appropriate growth related to return on assets and return on equity momentum relative to their peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 56. their income statement received an overall score of 61. cash flow Netflix appears likely to maintain its strong cash flow metrics and momentum going forward. Netflix's published free cash flow numbers were substantial and reflected management's focus on a healthy change strategy. Netflix recorded free cash flow of 6.6, which represents a 81.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 2.18%. These free cash flow numbers show that management has executed well while generating cash flow and encouraging growth. The company's free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 93. Also, Netflix's published capital expenditures (CapEx) numbers were encouraging and reflected management's balanced change strategy. Netflix recorded CapEx of -348.6M, which represents 15.00% change from the previous report. This performance is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. The company's CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 89. On the other hand, Asset Turnover, jumped out as looking rather underwhelming. Netflix's asset turnover numbers were discouraging, reflecting significant concerns related to management's ability to leverage assets to generate sales effectively and efficiently. Netflix recorded asset turnover of 0.7, which represents a -1.00% change from the previous report. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 2.38%. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly less impressive when compared to their peers and competitors. Correspondingly, their asset turnover movement received a grade of 59. Therefore, the company's cash flow earned a grade of 84. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. Netflix's stock is now priced above its 5-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the near, medium, and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), Netflix's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 78.
32,052	fundamental summary NetApp's financial results from Q1 demonstrated decent performance, but will likely only help NetApp remain on par with its peers. We do believe, though, that macro-related market conditions will influence the company's performance more significantly than its individual results. Therefore, NetApp received an overall score of 78, translating into a BUY ranking. balance sheet NetApp appears likely to maintain its strong balance sheet metrics and momentum going forward. NetApp reported solid equity numbers this period. At filing, equity was reported as 1.2B, representing 5.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 5.15% percent by this parameter. This performance is significantly more impressive than its peers and competitors. Consequently, their equity movement received a grade of 89. Also, NetApp's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 13.0 and represents 2.00% change from the previous report. These book value factor numbers show that management has been prudent in focusing on efficient growth. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its book value factors earned a score of 86. That said, one metric, Cash & Equivalents, stood out as particularly concerning. NetApp did a poor job related to managing cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 2.3B, representing a -13.00% change from the previous filing. The company's cash and cash equivalents metrics highlight a difficult overall financial situation, which may, unfortunately, continue moving forward unless management makes significant changes. Its cash and cash equivalents movement, therefore, received a grade of 47. Similarly, because its management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 91. income statement NetApp's income statement showed strong financials, specifically Revenue Efficiency and EBITDA. NetApp did an excellent job managing its revenue efficiency this past period. NetApp's revenue efficiency is 6.4B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a -2.00% change from the previous report. This parameter often affects companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 19.46%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. The company's revenue efficiency, therefore, received a grade of 87. Also, NetApp's management was effective in improving its EBIDTA, which now sits at 1.4B and represents a 5.00% change from the last reporting period. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 17.86%. Their EBITDA metrics are even more impressive relative to their peers and competitors, and its likely the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its EBITDA component earned a score of 77. That said, one metric, Return Factors, stood out as strongly negative. Return factors metrics and ratios were disappointing in this report. NetApp reported a return on equity (ROE) ratio of 127.6, representing a change of -2.00% from the last report.change of -2.00% from the previous period. This metric might have a 4.44% percent impact on companies in the same industry and with the same market capitalization. They does not yet appear to be headed in the right direction regarding these return on equity and return on assets metrics. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 64. Consequently, the companie's income statement earned a rank of 82. cash flow NetApp's recently published cash flow conveys disappointing growth, particularly with respect to Net Cash Flow and Free Cash flow metrics. NetApp's net cash flow metrics were -1.8B according to their current filing, which represents a -17.00% change from the previous report. Their net cash flow momentum should be a cause for concern and could bring negative momentum for NetApp's stock price going forward. Its net cash flow, therefore, received a grade of 48. Also, NetApp did a poor job related to generating and maintaining strong free cash flow this period, which stood at 4.0, representing a -14.00% change from the previous filing. Companies in the same industry and market capitalization are typically affected by this parameter by up to 4.11%. their free cash flow situation appears to be much weaker than their peers. Management needs to do a better job balancing cash flow, asset growth, and resources allocations in general. Disappointing results in free cash flow often lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated their free cash flow with a score of 49. At the same time, one {cash_flow} metric, Capital Expenditure, was actually strongly positive. NetApp's management did a great job this period managing its capital expenditure (CapEx). In terms of the raw numbers, CapEx was reported as -239.0M, which represents a 11.00% change from the last period. This performance is all the more impressive relative to their peers and competitors. The company's CapEx movement, therefore, received a grade of 85. Consequently, their cash flow earned a rank of 53. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. NetApp's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), NetApp's stock doesn't strongly signal being overbought or oversold. Overall, these technical indicators signal positive upward momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 68.
32,307	fundamental summary According to their recent financial report, which was published on May 26, 2023, NVIDIA Corporation had several impressive financial metrics that should make them more attractive than their peers going forward. Their positive growth and value factors indicate that the company is likely to continue to produce impressive results for the foreseeable future, as well. These results lead us to believe that there should be significant upside potential for the stock. As such, NVIDIA Corporation received an overall score of 80 and a BUY recommendation. balance sheet Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the balance sheet strength in NVIDIA Corporation's recent report: Book Value Factors and Cash & Equivalents. NVIDIA's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 37.8 and represents 77.00% change from the previous report. These book value factor numbers show that management has been prudent in focusing on efficient growth. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its book value factors earned a score of 97. Also, NVIDIA did a great job related to cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 5.1B, representing a 50.00% change from the previous filing. This impressive growth, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. Consequently, their cash and cash equivalents movement received a grade of 95. At the same time, one critical balance sheet metric, Assets, was notably weak. NVIDIA's management did not succeed in significantly improving the value of the assets on their balance sheet, which now sits at 44.5B and represents a 8.00% change from the previous report. NVIDIA's unremarkable asset growth results, specifically compared to their industry peers' performance, should present negative pressure on NVIDIA's stock price. Consequently, their asset movement received a grade of 62. Similarly, because the company's management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 91. income statement NVIDIA Corporation appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. NVIDIA did an excellent job managing its revenue efficiency this past period. NVIDIA's revenue efficiency is 25.9B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a -4.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 19.93%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. As a result, its revenue efficiency earned a score of 85. Also, NVIDIA's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 18.9, representing a change of 5.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 58. On the other hand, EBITDA, jumped out as looking problematic. NVIDIA's management didn't make significant improvements to their EBITDA this period. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 6.3B, which represents a -14.00% change from the last period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 14.29%. NVIDIA appears to be headed in the wrong direction in terms of EBITDA momentum, likely due to insufficient capital controls and a weaker than expected overall financial performance. Discouraging results like these statistically lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated their EBITDA a grade of 56. Its income statement, therefore, earned a score of 73. cash flow NVIDIA Corporation's cash flow factors had several troubling metrics this period. NVIDIA's asset turnover metrics were concerning and highlighted potential issues management is having effectively turning assets into sales efficiently. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.6, representing a -9.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 20.80% percent by this parameter. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly less impressive when compared to their peers and competitors. Underwhelming results in asset turnover metrics often lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated its asset turnover momentum 49. Also, NVIDIA's net cash flow metrics were 1.2B according to their current filing, which represents a -15.00% change from the previous report. As demonstrated by these concerning net cash flow metrics, their priorities seem to be headed in the wrong direction. Hence, their net cash flow earned a score of 63. That said, one metric, Free Cash flow, stood out as strongly positive. Free cash flow numbers published by NVIDIA were 2.1, which was a 34.00% change from the previous filing. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 4.19%. These free cash flow numbers show that management has executed well while generating cash flow and encouraging growth. The company's free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 82. Its cash flow, therefore, earned a score of 58. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. NVIDIA's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), NVIDIA's stock appears overbought. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 62.
32,307	fundamental summary According to their recent financial report, which was published on May 26, 2023, NVIDIA Corporation had several impressive financial metrics that should make them more attractive than their peers going forward. Their positive growth and value factors indicate that the company is likely to continue to produce impressive results for the foreseeable future, as well. These results lead us to believe that there should be significant upside potential for the stock. As such, NVIDIA Corporation received an overall score of 80 and a BUY recommendation. balance sheet Two metrics jump up as the most significant positive drivers of the balance sheet strength in NVIDIA Corporation's recent report: Book Value Factors and Cash & Equivalents. NVIDIA's price to book ratio (P/B) was reported as 37.8 and represents 77.00% change from the previous report. These book value factor numbers show that management has been prudent in focusing on efficient growth. We believe the stock price has room to grow to reflect its intrinsic value accurately. Therefore, its book value factors earned a score of 97. Also, NVIDIA did a great job related to cash and cash equivalents this period, which stood at 5.1B, representing a 50.00% change from the previous filing. This impressive growth, specifically in contrast to their industry peers' performance, should support an upswing in the company's stock price. Consequently, their cash and cash equivalents movement received a grade of 95. At the same time, one critical balance sheet metric, Assets, was notably weak. NVIDIA's management did not succeed in significantly improving the value of the assets on their balance sheet, which now sits at 44.5B and represents a 8.00% change from the previous report. NVIDIA's unremarkable asset growth results, specifically compared to their industry peers' performance, should present negative pressure on NVIDIA's stock price. Consequently, their asset movement received a grade of 62. Similarly, because the company's management is doing an excellent job managing these critical metrics, the balance sheet was given a score of 91. income statement NVIDIA Corporation appears likely to maintain its strong income statement metrics and momentum going forward. NVIDIA did an excellent job managing its revenue efficiency this past period. NVIDIA's revenue efficiency is 25.9B according to the metrics in the current filing, which represents a -4.00% change from the previous report. This characteristic can affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 19.93%. Their industry-leading revenue efficiency makes a strong case for upward pressure on its's stock price. As a result, its revenue efficiency earned a score of 85. Also, NVIDIA's reported return on equity (ROE) ratio was 18.9, representing a change of 5.00%. These numbers show that management has successfully encouraged growth while managing ROE and ROA metrics, especially relative to their peers. Consequently, their return factors received a grade of 58. On the other hand, EBITDA, jumped out as looking problematic. NVIDIA's management didn't make significant improvements to their EBITDA this period. In terms of the raw numbers, EBITDA was reported as 6.3B, which represents a -14.00% change from the last period. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 14.29%. NVIDIA appears to be headed in the wrong direction in terms of EBITDA momentum, likely due to insufficient capital controls and a weaker than expected overall financial performance. Discouraging results like these statistically lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated their EBITDA a grade of 56. Its income statement, therefore, earned a score of 73. cash flow NVIDIA Corporation's cash flow factors had several troubling metrics this period. NVIDIA's asset turnover metrics were concerning and highlighted potential issues management is having effectively turning assets into sales efficiently. At filing, their asset turnover metrics were 0.6, representing a -9.00% change from the previous period. Companies in the same sector and market capitalization will usually be affected by up to 20.80% percent by this parameter. Their asset turnover numbers are significantly less impressive when compared to their peers and competitors. Underwhelming results in asset turnover metrics often lead to negative pressure in stock prices, so we rated its asset turnover momentum 49. Also, NVIDIA's net cash flow metrics were 1.2B according to their current filing, which represents a -15.00% change from the previous report. As demonstrated by these concerning net cash flow metrics, their priorities seem to be headed in the wrong direction. Hence, their net cash flow earned a score of 63. That said, one metric, Free Cash flow, stood out as strongly positive. Free cash flow numbers published by NVIDIA were 2.1, which was a 34.00% change from the previous filing. This parameter coud affect companies in the same industry and market capitalization by up to 4.19%. These free cash flow numbers show that management has executed well while generating cash flow and encouraging growth. The company's free cash flow movement, therefore, received a grade of 82. Its cash flow, therefore, earned a score of 58. technical_analysis When trying to optimize the timing of an investment, it's critical to analyze whether the stock looks overbought or oversold, and in which direction the momentum is moving. NVIDIA's stock is now priced above its 50-day and 200-day, but below its 5-day moving average, while its MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicates that the stock's price movement momentum is strengthening. Historically, this is a positive setup in the medium and long-term. In particular, many institutional investors keep close watch of the 200-day moving average. The company is trading near it's 12-month high, which signals an attack on the resistance price. Meanwhile, looking at the Stochastic Oscillator and RSI (Relative Strength Index), NVIDIA's stock appears overbought. Overall, these technical indicators don't clearly signal directional momentum. Therefore, this stock received a cumulative TA (Technical Analysis) score of 62.

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.